Kaloni K S, Roy K K, Garg Deepali, Sarkar Avir, Zangmo Rinchen, Kulshreshtha Anshul
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ESIC, New Delhi, Haryana India.
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Apr;75(Suppl 1):473-479. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-02086-1. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
Demand for laparoscopic surgeries have been on the rise in all surgical departments in the past few decades. Hysterectomy, one of the most common gynaecological procedures is preferred laparoscopically these days owing to their multiple benefits.
To compare the efficacy and safety of Bupivacaine injection in Vault versus Paracervical Block and Vault Infiltration with Bupivacaine after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Thirty women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynaecology conditions were recruited and randomised into two comparable groups. Group I had 15 patients who received vaginal vault infiltration with 10 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine. Group II had 15 patients who received paracervical block before surgery and vaginal vault infiltration after vault closure with 10 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine. All patients were treated with injection paracetamol and NSAIDS. VAS score and need for additional analgesia were recorded at 1 h, 2 h and 6 h post-surgery. Any patient who reported a VAS score of more than 4 were given injection tramadol as rescue analgesia and recorded.
All the baseline characteristics were comparable except dysmenorrhoea ( = 0.017) and BMI (0.034) which showed statistically significant difference between the two groups. The VAS scores were significantly lower in combined group (Group I) when compared with vault infiltration group (Group II) across all time points ( < 0.001). The need for rescue analgesia at 1-h post-surgery was lower in both the groups and comparable among the two groups ( = 0.483). The need for rescue analgesia at 2 h { < 0.001} and 6 h post-surgery { < 0.001} were significantly lesser in Group II (combined group). No patients required additional analgesia in group II.
Two novel methods of administering local anaesthetic to alleviate post TLH pain when used in conjunction can significantly reduce pain and analgesia requirements making shorter hospital stay and early return to daily activities possible hence reducing cost per procedure.
在过去几十年里,所有外科科室对腹腔镜手术的需求都在上升。子宫切除术是最常见的妇科手术之一,如今由于其诸多益处,腹腔镜子宫切除术更受青睐。
比较布比卡因注射用于阴道穹窿与宫颈旁阻滞以及全腹腔镜子宫切除术后布比卡因阴道穹窿浸润的疗效和安全性。
招募30例因良性妇科疾病接受全腹腔镜子宫切除术的女性,并随机分为两个可比组。第一组有15例患者,接受10毫升0.5%布比卡因的阴道穹窿浸润。第二组有15例患者,术前接受宫颈旁阻滞,穹窿关闭后接受10毫升0.5%布比卡因的阴道穹窿浸润。所有患者均接受对乙酰氨基酚注射液和非甾体抗炎药治疗。术后1小时、2小时和6小时记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)及额外镇痛需求。任何报告VAS评分超过4分的患者给予曲马多注射液作为补救镇痛并记录。
除痛经(P = 0.017)和体重指数(BMI,P = 0.034)外,所有基线特征均具有可比性,这两项在两组之间显示出统计学上的显著差异。在所有时间点,联合组(第一组)的VAS评分均显著低于穹窿浸润组(第二组)(P < 0.001)。两组术后1小时的补救镇痛需求均较低,且两组之间具有可比性(P = 0.483)。术后2小时(P < 0.001)和6小时(P < 0.001),第二组(联合组)的补救镇痛需求显著较少。第二组无患者需要额外镇痛。
两种联合使用的新型局部麻醉给药方法可显著减轻全腹腔镜子宫切除术后疼痛及镇痛需求,使住院时间缩短并能早日恢复日常活动,从而降低每次手术的成本。