Fujii Takashi, Fukui Yoshimasa, Maruyama Kousei, Takigawa Kosuke, Tashiro Noriaki, Matsukawa Hidetoshi, Hashiguchi Yoshiya, Yasumoto Masanobu, Yasaka Masahiro, Aikawa Hiroshi, Go Yoshinori, Kazekawa Kiyoshi
Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Neurosurgical Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, Fukuoka Neurosurgical Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Neuroradiol J. 2025 May 20:19714009251345106. doi: 10.1177/19714009251345106.
Although the effectiveness of thrombectomy has become clear, there is no consensus on whether sedation should be performed under general anesthesia or procedural sedation. Midazolam is used to achieve mild sedation during invasive treatments and examinations. This study aimed to investigate the treatment outcomes of thrombectomy under mild sedation using midazolam and report them retrospectively. This study included 100 cases of acute occlusion of the anterior circulation of intracranial vessels with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 10 or more who underwent thrombectomy under sedation using midazolam at our hospital between 2023 and 2024. The average age of the patients was 79.0 ± 12.2 years, and the preoperative NIHSS score was 19.8 ± 6.4. In total, 92 cases (92.0%) with modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2B or higher recovered with an average time from puncture to recanalization of 32 ± 23 min, and 52 cases (52.0%) had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) 3 months later. Anesthesia-related complications included postoperative pneumonia in seven cases (7.0%), and procedural complications included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage due to perforation of intracranial vessels by the microguidewire in one case (1.0%). Nine patients (9.0%) died 3 months after surgery. Thrombectomy under procedural sedation using midazolam achieves favorable outcomes owing to favorable and rapid recanalization. In addition, there are few procedural complications due to body movement and few anesthesia-related complications due to sedation, making this a safe method.
尽管血栓切除术的有效性已很明确,但对于镇静应在全身麻醉还是程序性镇静下进行,尚无共识。咪达唑仑用于在侵入性治疗和检查期间实现轻度镇静。本研究旨在回顾性调查使用咪达唑仑进行轻度镇静下血栓切除术的治疗结果并进行报告。本研究纳入了100例2023年至2024年在我院接受使用咪达唑仑镇静下血栓切除术的颅内血管前循环急性闭塞患者,其美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分在10分及以上。患者的平均年龄为79.0±12.2岁,术前NIHSS评分为19.8±6.4。总共92例(92.0%)脑梗死溶栓改良2B级或更高的患者恢复,从穿刺到再通的平均时间为32±23分钟,52例(52.0%)在3个月后获得了良好结局(改良Rankin量表0 - 2级)。麻醉相关并发症包括7例(7.0%)术后肺炎,程序性并发症包括1例(1.0%)微导丝穿孔导致的症状性颅内出血。9例患者(9.0%)在术后3个月死亡。使用咪达唑仑进行程序性镇静下的血栓切除术由于再通良好且迅速而取得了良好结局。此外,因身体移动导致的程序性并发症很少,因镇静导致的麻醉相关并发症也很少,使其成为一种安全的方法。