• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众知晓政客的股票交易行为会降低国会的合法性以及对法律的遵守程度。

Knowledge of politician stock trading reduces congressional legitimacy and compliance with the law.

作者信息

Alam Raihan, Rai Tage S

机构信息

Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 27;122(21):e2501822122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2501822122. Epub 2025 May 20.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2501822122
PMID:40392849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12130894/
Abstract

Institutional legitimacy is essential for democracies, yet public trust and confidence in the United States Congress are at an all-time low. A significant predictor of attitudes toward Congress is perceptions of corruption, with perceptions of corruption in government linked to less legitimacy. This study tests whether knowledge of Congressional stock trading affects legitimacy and compliance with Congressional authority. In a preregistered experiment with US citizens ( = 506), participants who read a report detailing how Congressmembers made higher-than-expected profits from stock trading in 2024 reported increased perceptions of corruption and decreased legitimacy in Congress. They also viewed laws passed by Congress as less fair and were less willing to comply with such laws. Perceptions of Congressional legitimacy mediated the effect of stock trading knowledge on willingness to comply with congressional laws and perceptions of congressional laws as fair. A preregistered follow-up experiment ( = 664) shows that these effects are not driven by how much Congressmembers profit but by how trading negatively affects broader perceptions of legitimacy. These findings highlight the detrimental effects of Congressional stock trading on perceptions of legitimacy and respect for the law.

摘要

制度合法性对民主国家至关重要,但美国公众对国会的信任和信心处于历史最低点。对国会态度的一个重要预测因素是对腐败的认知,对政府腐败的认知与较低的合法性相关。本研究测试了对国会股票交易的了解是否会影响合法性以及对国会权威的遵守。在一项对美国公民进行的预注册实验(n = 506)中,阅读了一份详细报告的参与者,该报告详述了国会议员在2024年通过股票交易获得高于预期利润的情况,他们报告称对腐败的认知增加,对国会合法性的认知降低。他们还认为国会通过的法律不那么公平,并且不太愿意遵守这些法律。对国会合法性的认知介导了股票交易知识对遵守国会法律意愿以及将国会法律视为公平的认知的影响。一项预注册的后续实验(n = 664)表明,这些影响不是由国会议员获利多少驱动的,而是由交易对更广泛的合法性认知的负面影响驱动的。这些发现凸显了国会股票交易对合法性认知和对法律尊重的有害影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee0/12130894/9ed6857e6f08/pnas.2501822122fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee0/12130894/390befa10dfe/pnas.2501822122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee0/12130894/9ed6857e6f08/pnas.2501822122fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee0/12130894/390befa10dfe/pnas.2501822122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee0/12130894/9ed6857e6f08/pnas.2501822122fig02.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge of politician stock trading reduces congressional legitimacy and compliance with the law.公众知晓政客的股票交易行为会降低国会的合法性以及对法律的遵守程度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 27;122(21):e2501822122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2501822122. Epub 2025 May 20.
2
How do perceptions of procedural justice, police legitimacy, and legitimacy of laws influence intentions to drug drive?人们对程序正义、警察合法性和法律合法性的看法如何影响毒驾意图?
J Safety Res. 2024 Sep;90:86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
On the Ethics of "Non-Corporate" Insider Trading.论“非公司型”内幕交易的伦理问题
J Bus Ethics. 2022;177(1):79-93. doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04739-x. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Effective Law Enforcement.心理科学对美国警务工作的影响:程序正义、合法性与有效执法
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015 Dec;16(3):75-109. doi: 10.1177/1529100615617791.
5
Improving compliance around protected areas through fair administration of rules.通过公正执行规则提高保护区周边的合规性。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Feb;39(1):e14332. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14332. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media.当选举期望落空时:随着选举结果证据的积累和极化媒体的出现,对选举合法性的两极化看法会增加。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259473. eCollection 2021.
7
Legitimacy versus morality: Why do the Chinese obey the law?合法性与道德:中国人为何守法?
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Apr;42(2):167-180. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000271.
8
A Dilemma of Self-interest vs. Ethical Responsibilities in Political Insider Trading.政治内幕交易中自身利益与道德责任的困境
J Bus Ethics. 2022 Oct 14:1-31. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05265-0.
9
Company stock prices before and after public announcements related to oncology drugs.与肿瘤药物相关的公司公告前后的股价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 19;103(20):1507-12. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr338. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
10
The stock market as a casino: Associations between stock market trading frequency and problem gambling.股市如赌场:股票交易频率与赌博问题之间的关联。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Sep 28;10(3):683-689. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00058.

引用本文的文献

1
Profitable third-party punishment destabilizes cooperation.有利可图的第三方惩罚会破坏合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 26;122(34):e2508479122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2508479122. Epub 2025 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy.社区警务与警察合法性的实地实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 1;116(40):19894-19898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910157116. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
2
The origins and consequences of public trust in government: a time series analysis.公众对政府信任的起源和后果:时间序列分析。
Public Opin Q. 2000 Fall;64(3):239-56. doi: 10.1086/317987.