Tattan-Birch Harry, East Katherine, Cox Sharon, Jackson Sarah, Brown Jamie, Simonavicius Erikas, Reid Jessica L, Hammond David, Taylor Eve Violet
Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Tob Control. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-059210.
To estimate the impact of standardising the colour and branding of disposable vaping devices on young people's interest in trying them.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were from national surveys of 16-29-year-olds in Canada, England and the United States in 2023 (N=15 259).
Respondents were randomised (1:1) to view images of either four branded disposable vapes (N=7638) or four standardised white disposable vapes (n=7621) and asked which they would be interested in trying.
The primary outcome was selecting "no interest in trying" rather than any of the vapes displayed. We also examined whether the impact of standardisation differed by five potential moderators.
A greater proportion of participants reported "no interest in trying" the white standardised than branded vapes (67.1% vs 62.8%; adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 1.127, 95% CI 1.085 to 1.169). Compared with those who had never smoked or vaped, the impact of standardisation on those reporting no interest was greater for those who had, in the past 30 days, only smoked (47.5% vs 37.5%, ARR 1.287, 95% CI 1.079 to 1.495), only vaped (19.9% vs 16.4%, ARR 1.220, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.438), dual used (13.5% vs 9.5%, ARR 1.420, 95% CI 1.017 to 1.822) or who had formerly vaped/smoked (72.6% vs 65.0%, ARR 1.119, 95% CI 1.071 to 1.167). The impact was also greatest in the oldest age group, but there were no other clear moderators.
Standardising the colour and branding of disposable vaping devices reduces young people's interest in trying them. However, this includes a substantial impact on those who smoke.
评估一次性电子烟设备颜色和品牌标准化对年轻人尝试意愿的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:数据来自2023年对加拿大、英国和美国16至29岁人群的全国性调查(N = 15259)。
受访者被随机分为两组(1:1),分别观看四个品牌一次性电子烟的图片(N = 7638)或四个标准化白色一次性电子烟的图片(n = 7621),并询问他们对尝试哪种电子烟感兴趣。
主要结局是选择“对尝试不感兴趣”而非展示的任何一种电子烟。我们还研究了标准化的影响是否因五个潜在调节因素而异。
报告“对尝试白色标准化电子烟不感兴趣”的参与者比例高于品牌电子烟(67.1%对62.8%;调整风险比(ARR)1.127,95%置信区间1.085至1.169)。与从未吸烟或吸电子烟的人相比,标准化对那些报告不感兴趣的人的影响在以下人群中更大:在过去30天内仅吸烟的人(47.5%对37.5%,ARR 1.287,95%置信区间1.079至1.495)、仅吸电子烟的人(19.9%对16.4%,ARR 1.220,95%置信区间1.002至1.438)、同时使用两种产品的人(13.5%对9.5%,ARR 1.420,95%置信区间1.017至1.822)或曾经吸电子烟/吸烟的人(72.6%对65.0%,ARR 1.119,95%置信区间1.071至1.167)。这种影响在年龄最大的年龄组中也最为明显,但没有其他明显的调节因素。
一次性电子烟设备颜色和品牌的标准化降低了年轻人尝试它们的兴趣。然而,这对吸烟者也有很大影响。