LeLaurin Jennifer H, Pluta Kathryn, Norton Wynne E, Salloum Ramzi G, Singh Ospina Naykky
Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jul 18;34(8):547-555. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018558.
The continued use of low-value cancer screening practices not only represents healthcare waste but also a potential cascade of invasive diagnostic procedures and patient anxiety and distress. While prior research has shown it takes an average of 15 years to implement evidence-based practices in cancer control, little is known about how long it takes to de-implement low-value cancer screening practices. We reviewed evidence on six United States Preventive Services Task Force 'Grade D' cancer screening practices: (1) cervical cancer screening in women<21 years and >65 years, (2) prostate cancer screening in men≥70 years and (3) ovarian, (4) thyroid, (5) testicular and (6) pancreatic cancer screening in asymptomatic adults. We measured the time from a landmark publication supporting the guideline publication and subsequent de-implementation, defined as a 50% reduction in the use of the practice in routine care. The pace of de-implementation was assessed using nationally representative surveillance systems and peer-reviewed literature from the USA. We found the time to de-implementation of cervical cancer screening was 4 years for women<21 and 16 years for women>65. Prostate screening in men ≥70 has not reached a 50% reduction in use since the 2012 guideline release. We did not identify sufficient evidence to measure the time to de-implementation for ovarian, thyroid, testicular and pancreatic cancer screening in asymptomatic adults. Surveillance of low-value cancer screening is sparse, posing a clear barrier to tracking the de-implementation of these screening practices. Improving the systematic measurement of low-value cancer control practices is imperative for assessing the impact of de-implementation on patient outcomes, healthcare delivery and healthcare costs.
继续使用低价值癌症筛查方法不仅意味着医疗资源的浪费,还可能引发一系列侵入性诊断程序,并导致患者焦虑和痛苦。虽然先前的研究表明,在癌症控制中实施循证实践平均需要15年时间,但对于摒弃低价值癌症筛查方法需要多长时间却知之甚少。我们回顾了美国预防服务工作组“D级”的六种癌症筛查方法的相关证据:(1)21岁以下和65岁以上女性的宫颈癌筛查;(2)70岁及以上男性的前列腺癌筛查;以及(3)卵巢癌、(4)甲状腺癌、(5)睾丸癌和(6)无症状成年人的胰腺癌筛查。我们测量了从支持指南发布的标志性出版物到随后摒弃该筛查方法的时间,摒弃定义为常规护理中该筛查方法的使用减少50%。摒弃的速度是通过使用具有全国代表性的监测系统和来自美国的同行评审文献来评估的。我们发现,21岁以下女性摒弃宫颈癌筛查的时间为4年,65岁以上女性为16年。自2012年指南发布以来,70岁及以上男性的前列腺癌筛查使用率尚未降低50%。我们没有找到足够的证据来衡量无症状成年人卵巢癌、甲状腺癌、睾丸癌和胰腺癌筛查摒弃的时间。对低价值癌症筛查的监测很少,这显然阻碍了对这些筛查方法摒弃情况的跟踪。改善对低价值癌症控制方法的系统测量对于评估摒弃对患者预后、医疗服务提供和医疗成本的影响至关重要。