Karabağ Mert, Gümrükçü Zeynep, Bayrak Seval
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey.
Department of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06122-y.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of surface properties and geometric design on marginal bone loss in dental implants and to compare the parallelism of bone loss and fractal analysis results.
A total of 378 implants from 114 patients were evaluated in this study using panoramic and periapical radiographs. Implants were categorized into 19 subgroups according to the jaw where they were placed, length, diameter, surface preparation, type of prosthetic superstructure, and neck design. Radiological evaluations were conducted based on radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 3 months after prosthetic loading. After obtaining measurements of marginal bone loss and fractal analysis data, the significance of differences between groups was statistically evaluated.
Marginal bone loss was significantly higher in the maxilla compared to the mandible when considering the changes between jaws (p < 0.05). Analysis of variations among prosthetic superstructures revealed that implant-supported removable prostheses had the highest marginal bone loss (p < 0.05). Additionally, marginal bone loss was significantly lower in implants with coronal microthreads not exceeding 1 mm compared to those exceeding 1 mm (p < 0.05). Also the increase in fractal values was significantly higher in implants with coronal microthreads 1 mm compared to 3 mm.
This study demonstrates that the geometric design of dental implants may have an impact on marginal bone loss, which is a determinant of long-term success. However, considering that marginal bone loss has a multifactorial etiology, further studies are needed to identify other potential factors contributing to marginal bone loss.
本研究旨在调查表面特性和几何设计对牙种植体边缘骨吸收的影响,并比较骨吸收的平行性和分形分析结果。
本研究使用全景片和根尖片对114例患者的378颗种植体进行了评估。根据种植体植入的颌骨、长度、直径、表面处理、修复上部结构类型和颈部设计,将种植体分为19个亚组。基于种植体植入时和修复加载后3个月获得的X线片进行影像学评估。在获得边缘骨吸收测量值和分形分析数据后,对组间差异的显著性进行了统计学评估。
考虑颌骨间的变化时,上颌的边缘骨吸收明显高于下颌(p<0.05)。对修复上部结构之间差异的分析表明,种植体支持的可摘义齿边缘骨吸收最高(p<0.05)。此外,与冠部微螺纹超过1mm的种植体相比,冠部微螺纹不超过1mm的种植体边缘骨吸收明显更低(p<0.05)。同样,与冠部微螺纹为3mm的种植体相比,冠部微螺纹为1mm的种植体分形值的增加明显更高。
本研究表明,牙种植体的几何设计可能会对边缘骨吸收产生影响,而边缘骨吸收是长期成功的一个决定因素。然而,考虑到边缘骨吸收具有多因素病因,需要进一步研究以确定导致边缘骨吸收的其他潜在因素。