Molz K H, Salama Z B, Gielsdorf W, Jaeger H, Krejci G
Arzneimittelforschung. 1985;35(3):626-9.
In a comparative tolerance study with two different intravenous methylxanthine preparations, a theophylline-ethylendiamine preparation (TE-reference preparation) was tested against a combination of theophylline, proxyphylline (7-(2-hydroxypropyl)-theophylline) and diprophylline (7-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-theophylline) (Neobiphyllin; TPD = test preparation) in 10 healthy volunteers by a single blind cross-over design. Both preparations were infused under continuous control of vital parameters (blood pressure, pulse, respiration frequency, heart rhythm) as infusions (1 ampoule with 800 mg TPD or 1 short-infusion with 480 mg of TE for 20 min, each) up to the individual tolerance limit or the pre-defined limit of 3 ampoules/short infusions, respectively. The maximum tolerated infusion time and the serum levels at which the first side-effects appeared, were compared. These maximum doses could be administered to 6 volunteers under TPD, but only to two under medication with the reference preparation. Side-effects under TPD occurred in 5, after infusion of the reference preparation in 9 volunteers. Serum levels of theophylline at the end of the infusion period reached (14.6 +/- 4.21 (TPD) and 23.01 +/- 6.02 mg/l (TE), respectively. The average infusion time for the test preparation was 54.8, for the reference preparation 46.2 min. The average serum theophylline levels of the 5 volunteers with side-effects under TPD reached--when these side-effects occurred --11.26 +/- 4.52 mg/l; the same volunteers showed after administration of TE levels of 14.94 +/- 7.49 mg/l. Our results showed an approx. additive effect of the side-effects together with an--according to literature--over-additive pharmacological effect of the single components of TPD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项针对两种不同静脉注射甲基黄嘌呤制剂的耐受性比较研究中,通过单盲交叉设计,在10名健康志愿者身上对一种氨茶碱 - 乙二胺制剂(TE - 参比制剂)与氨茶碱、丙羟茶碱(7 - (2 - 羟丙基) - 氨茶碱)和二羟丙茶碱(7 - (2,3 - 二羟丙基) - 氨茶碱)的组合(Neobiphyllin;TPD = 受试制剂)进行了测试。两种制剂均在生命体征参数(血压、脉搏、呼吸频率、心律)的持续监测下进行输注(分别为1安瓿含800 mg TPD或1次短时间输注含480 mg TE,持续20分钟),直至达到个体耐受极限或预先定义的3安瓿/短时间输注的极限。比较了最大耐受输注时间以及首次出现副作用时的血清水平。这些最大剂量在TPD组可给予6名志愿者,但参比制剂组仅能给予2名志愿者。TPD组有5名志愿者出现副作用,参比制剂组输注后有9名志愿者出现副作用。输注期结束时氨茶碱的血清水平分别达到(14.6 ± 4.21(TPD)和23.01 ± 6.02 mg/L(TE)。受试制剂的平均输注时间为54.8分钟,参比制剂为46.2分钟。TPD组出现副作用的5名志愿者在出现副作用时氨茶碱的平均血清水平达到11.26 ± 4.52 mg/L;这些志愿者在给予TE后血清水平为14.94 ± 7.49 mg/L。我们的结果显示副作用具有近似相加效应,并且根据文献,TPD单一成分具有超相加药理效应。(摘要截断于250字)