• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The relationship between coping strategies, stress, and anxiety among King Saud University medical students.沙特国王大学医学生应对策略、压力与焦虑之间的关系。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Apr;14(4):1169-1173. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1820_23. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Navigating the medical journey: Insights into medical students' psychological wellbeing, coping, and personality.探索医学之旅:对医学生心理健康、应对方式及性格的洞察
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 6;20(2):e0318399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318399. eCollection 2025.
3
Investigating the Relationship Between Resilience, Stress-Coping Strategies, and Learning Approaches to Predict Academic Performance in Undergraduate Medical Students: Protocol for a Proof-of-Concept Study.探究本科医学生的心理韧性、压力应对策略和学习方法之间的关系以预测学业成绩:概念验证研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Sep 19;8(9):e14677. doi: 10.2196/14677.
4
Stressors and coping strategies among medical students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯吉赞医科学生的压力源与应对策略:一项横断面研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Sep;12(9):2075-2081. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_545_23. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
5
Anxiety, perceived stress and coping strategies in nursing students: a cross-sectional, correlational, descriptive study.护理专业学生的焦虑、感知压力及应对策略:一项横断面、相关性描述性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 19;20(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02294-z.
6
Faith, Friends, and Humor: How Medical Students Cope with Academic Stress in a Private Medical University in Saudi Arabia.信念、朋友与幽默:沙特阿拉伯一所私立医科大学的医学生如何应对学业压力
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Dec 9;15:1205-1213. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S475224. eCollection 2024.
7
Sources of stress, coping strategies and associated factors among Vietnamese first-year medical students.越南一年级医学生的压力源、应对策略及相关因素
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0308239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308239. eCollection 2024.
8
Clinical environmental stressors and coping behaviors among undergraduate nursing students in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯本科护理专业学生的临床环境压力源与应对行为:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Dec 23;10(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.12.007. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Health anxiety, perceived stress, and coping styles in the shadow of the COVID-19.新冠疫情阴影下的健康焦虑、感知压力和应对方式。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Apr 6;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00560-3.
10
Adjustment disorder among first year medical students at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in 2020.2020年沙特阿拉伯利雅得国王沙特大学一年级医学生中的适应障碍。
J Family Community Med. 2023 Jan-Mar;30(1):59-64. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_227_22. Epub 2022 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Mediating Role of Active Coping Strategies in the Relationship Between Academic Stressors and Stress Responses Among University Students.积极应对策略在大学生学业压力源与压力反应关系中的中介作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;13(14):1674. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141674.

本文引用的文献

1
A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between burnout, absenteeism, and job performance among American nurses.一项横断面研究,探讨美国护士职业倦怠、旷工与工作绩效之间的关系。
BMC Nurs. 2019 Nov 21;18:57. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0382-7. eCollection 2019.
2
Stressors and reactions to stressors among university students.大学生的应激源和应激反应。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;57(1):69-80. doi: 10.1177/0020764009348442.
3
Depression, desperation, and suicidal ideation in college students: results from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention College Screening Project at Emory University.大学生中的抑郁、绝望和自杀意念:埃默里大学美国预防自杀基金会大学筛查项目的结果。
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(6):482-8. doi: 10.1002/da.20321.
4
An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample.对一个中年社区样本应对方式的分析。
J Health Soc Behav. 1980 Sep;21(3):219-39.

沙特国王大学医学生应对策略、压力与焦虑之间的关系。

The relationship between coping strategies, stress, and anxiety among King Saud University medical students.

作者信息

Aljaffer Mohammad A, Almazam Ali A, Alzahrani Faisal G, Alsultan Fahad M, Alrasheed Abdulaziz M, Almousa Rayyan M, Alsuhaibani Abdullah I

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Psychiatry, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Apr;14(4):1169-1173. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1820_23. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1820_23
PMID:40396095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12088559/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The issue of how personality impacts individuals' coping mechanisms in response to stressful circumstances has been extensively explored. There has been scholarly discourse on the potential confusion of stress-coping styles with personality traits.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between coping strategies, stress, and anxiety among medical students at King Saud University.

METHODS

A total of 332 medical students completed a survey assessing stress and anxiety levels using standardized scales, alongside questions on coping strategies. Correlation analysis examined associations between variables.

RESULTS

Stress and anxiety exhibited a very weak positive correlation (r = 0.074, P = 0.175). Stress levels showed a moderate positive correlation with coping strategies (r = 0.312, P < 0.001), while coping strategies correlated moderately negatively with anxiety (r = -0.231, P < 0.001) but not with stressors. Academic-related stressors were predominant (63%), with problem-focused coping strategies like seeking social support and planning commonly employed.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher anxiety levels correlating with increased coping strategy use among medical students, specific stressor types did not influence strategy choice. Targeted interventions are needed to address stress triggers and enhance well-being.

摘要

引言

个性如何影响个体应对压力情境的应对机制这一问题已得到广泛探讨。关于压力应对方式与个性特征之间可能存在混淆的学术讨论也一直存在。

目的

本研究旨在调查沙特国王大学医学院学生的应对策略、压力和焦虑之间的关系。

方法

共有332名医学院学生完成了一项调查,该调查使用标准化量表评估压力和焦虑水平,并附带关于应对策略的问题。相关性分析检验了变量之间的关联。

结果

压力和焦虑呈现出非常微弱的正相关(r = 0.074,P = 0.175)。压力水平与应对策略呈现出中度正相关(r = 0.312,P < 0.001),而应对策略与焦虑呈现出中度负相关(r = -0.231,P < 0.001),但与压力源无关。与学业相关的压力源占主导(63%),常用的应对策略如寻求社会支持和制定计划等以问题为导向。

结论

尽管医学院学生中焦虑水平较高与应对策略使用增加相关,但特定类型的压力源并未影响策略选择。需要有针对性的干预措施来应对压力触发因素并增进幸福感。