• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠双平面超声评估扩大视野成像测量直肠肿瘤至肛门边缘距离的最低边界

Evaluating Extended Field of View Imaging for Measuring Rectal Tumor Lowest Boundary to Anal Verge Distance via Transrectal Biplane Ultrasound.

作者信息

Zhang Yan, Liang Lu, Ma Huachong, Han Jiagang, Lv Xiuzhang, Ge Huiyu

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Radiology Department, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ultrasound Int Open. 2025 May 5;11:a25696939. doi: 10.1055/a-2569-6939. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1055/a-2569-6939
PMID:40396169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12090980/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to measure the precise distance from the lowest boundary of a rectal tumor to the anal verge (DTAV) in patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data from 70 rectal cancer patients. DTAV measurements were collected using transrectal biplane ultrasound, MRI, and colonoscopy.

RESULTS

The difference in DTAV measurements between the mean DTAV value obtained by ultrasound (US ) and colonoscopy exhibited a difference of 0.22 cm. In contrast, the difference between US and MRI was 0.48 cm, while the difference between MRI and colonoscopy was -0.26 cm. The ICC for DTAV measurements demonstrated excellent agreement, with values of 0.948 between US and MRI, 0.942 between US and colonoscopy, and 0.943 between MRI and colonoscopy. The minimum DTAV value obtained by ultrasound (US ) was 5.05 cm, the middle DTAV value obtained by ultrasound (US ) was 5.10 cm, and the maximum DTAV value obtained by ultrasound (US ) was 5.30 cm. Notably, the median values of the differences in DTAV measurements between US and US , US and US , as well as US and US , were 0.2 cm, 0.1 cm, and 0.1 cm, respectively. Furthermore, the consistency of DTAV measurements between US and US , US and US , as well as US and US was excellent, with all ICC values reaching 0.999. Additionally, the radiologist's reassessment of MRI DTAV data showed excellent consistency with the original results, with an ICC value of 0.985.

CONCLUSION

Transrectal biplane ultrasound utilizing EFOV imaging technology exhibited both accuracy and reproducibility for measuring DTAV. This approach provided a highly efficient and practical clinical tool for DTAV measurement.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测量直肠癌患者直肠肿瘤最低边界至肛缘(DTAV)的精确距离。

材料与方法

对70例直肠癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。采用经直肠双平面超声、磁共振成像(MRI)和结肠镜检查收集DTAV测量值。

结果

超声(US )获得的平均DTAV值与结肠镜检查之间的DTAV测量值差异为0.22 cm。相比之下,US 与MRI之间的差异为0.48 cm,而MRI与结肠镜检查之间的差异为-0.26 cm。DTAV测量的组内相关系数(ICC)显示出极佳的一致性,US 与MRI之间的值为0.948,US 与结肠镜检查之间的值为0.942,MRI与结肠镜检查之间的值为0.943。超声(US )获得的最小DTAV值为5.05 cm,超声(US )获得的中间DTAV值为5.10 cm,超声(US )获得的最大DTAV值为5.30 cm。值得注意的是,US 与US 、US 与US 以及US 与US 之间DTAV测量值差异的中位数分别为0.2 cm、0.1 cm和0.1 cm。此外,US 与US 、US 与US 以及US 与US 之间DTAV测量的一致性极佳,所有ICC值均达到0.999。此外,放射科医生对MRI DTAV数据的重新评估与原始结果显示出极佳的一致性,ICC值为0.985。

结论

利用扩展视野(EFOV)成像技术的经直肠双平面超声在测量DTAV方面具有准确性和可重复性。该方法为DTAV测量提供了一种高效实用的临床工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/fa9bf578c90a/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721594.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/538ffe324689/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721591.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/9d193cd36ad5/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721592.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/4804bc5ed456/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721593.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/fa9bf578c90a/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721594.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/538ffe324689/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721591.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/9d193cd36ad5/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721592.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/4804bc5ed456/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721593.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088d/12090980/fa9bf578c90a/10-1055-a-2569-6939_25721594.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Extended Field of View Imaging for Measuring Rectal Tumor Lowest Boundary to Anal Verge Distance via Transrectal Biplane Ultrasound.经直肠双平面超声评估扩大视野成像测量直肠肿瘤至肛门边缘距离的最低边界
Ultrasound Int Open. 2025 May 5;11:a25696939. doi: 10.1055/a-2569-6939. eCollection 2025.
2
A boundary-guided transformer for measuring distance from rectal tumor to anal verge on magnetic resonance images.一种用于在磁共振图像上测量直肠肿瘤与肛缘距离的边界引导变压器。
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Mar 27;4(4):100711. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100711. eCollection 2023 Apr 14.
3
Measuring distance from lowest boundary of rectal tumor to anal verge on CT images using pyramid attention pooling transformer.使用金字塔注意力池化变换器在CT图像上测量直肠肿瘤最低边界到肛缘的距离。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Mar;155:106675. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106675. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
4
Distance to the anal verge is associated with pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.距肛缘的距离与局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗的病理完全缓解相关。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;114(5):637-641. doi: 10.1002/jso.24358. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Measurement of rectal tumor height from the anal verge on MRI: a comparison of internal versus external anal sphincter.MRI 测量肛缘至直肠肿瘤的距离:内、外括约肌的对比。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Mar;46(3):867-872. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02757-3. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
[Analysis on clinical factors affecting transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction in rectal cancer surgery].[影响直肠癌手术经直肠自然腔道标本取出术的临床因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 May 25;23(5):480-485. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190406-00149.
7
Height of Rectal Cancer: A Comparison between Rectoscopic and Different MRI Measurements.直肠癌的高度:直肠镜检查与不同MRI测量方法的比较
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Jan 28;2020:2130705. doi: 10.1155/2020/2130705. eCollection 2020.
8
How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers.如何在 MRI 上准确测量肛缘至直肠癌的距离:使用肛缘标志物的前瞻性研究。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Feb;46(2):449-458. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02654-9. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
9
MRI-based nomogram analysis: recognition of anterior peritoneal reflection and its relationship to rectal cancers.MRI 基列线图分析:识别前腹膜反射及其与直肠癌的关系。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00583-7.
10
[Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].[影响腹腔镜辅助三孔法前切除术难度的因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;21(7):779-785.

本文引用的文献

1
How do they measure up: Assessing the height of rectal cancer with digital rectal exam, endoscopy, and MRI它们的效果如何:通过直肠指检、内镜检查和磁共振成像评估直肠癌的高度
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 May 30;10:100096. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100096. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Interrater Agreement of Height Assessment by Rigid Proctoscopy/Rectoscopy for Rectal Carcinoma.硬性直肠镜/直肠检查法对直肠癌进行身高评估的观察者间一致性
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Aug 1;67(8):1018-1023. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003301. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
How to Study the Location and Size of Rectal Tumors That Are Candidates for Local Surgery: Rigid Rectoscopy, Magnetic Resonance, Endorectal Ultrasound or Colonoscopy? An Interobservational Study.
如何研究适合局部手术的直肠肿瘤的位置和大小:硬式直肠镜检查、磁共振成像、直肠内超声还是结肠镜检查?一项观察性研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;14(3):315. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030315.
4
Cancer statistics, 2024.2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Cancer profiles in China and comparisons with the USA: a comprehensive analysis in the incidence, mortality, survival, staging, and attribution to risk factors.中国癌症概况及与美国的比较:发病率、死亡率、生存率、分期和归因于危险因素的综合分析。
Sci China Life Sci. 2024 Jan;67(1):122-131. doi: 10.1007/s11427-023-2423-1. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
6
A boundary-guided transformer for measuring distance from rectal tumor to anal verge on magnetic resonance images.一种用于在磁共振图像上测量直肠肿瘤与肛缘距离的边界引导变压器。
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Mar 27;4(4):100711. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100711. eCollection 2023 Apr 14.
7
Measuring fascicle lengths of extrinsic and intrinsic thumb muscles using extended field-of-view ultrasound.使用扩展视野超声测量外在和内在拇指肌肉束的长度。
J Biomech. 2023 Mar;149:111512. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111512. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
8
Comparison of flexible endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the tumor height in rectal cancer.比较直肠肿瘤的内镜和磁共振成像在确定肿瘤高度的应用。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Feb;6(2):e1705. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1705. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
Investigation of Structural Changes in Rectus Abdominis Muscle According to Curl-Up Angle Using Ultrasound with an Extended Field of View.使用扩展视野的超声研究仰卧起坐时腹直肌的结构变化与卷曲角度的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 5;19(21):14525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114525.
10
Optimal Neoadjuvant Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer by Risk Assessment and Tumor Location.基于风险评估和肿瘤位置的局部晚期直肠癌的最佳新辅助策略。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Oct;20(10):1177-1184. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7061.