Suppr超能文献

支持身体残疾者获得有效的替代途径:科学现状、新兴技术及未来研究方向。

Supporting effective alternative access for individuals with physical disabilities: state of the science, emerging technologies, and future research directions.

作者信息

Koester Heidi, Koch Fager Susan, Gormley Jessica, Jakobs Erik, Johnsen Kelli, Brumberg Jon

机构信息

RERC on AAC, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

Koester Performance Research, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Augment Altern Commun. 2025 Sep;41(3):304-317. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2025.2499676. Epub 2025 May 21.

Abstract

Alternative access methods accommodate an individual's specific physical disability, by adjusting the typical keyboard/mouse/touchscreen interface or using an alternative interface such as head controls, eye trackers, or switches. Ideally, they allow for efficient and comfortable use of any computing device, such as laptops, tablets, and smartphones. This paper reviews the literature to address two main questions: how well do existing access methods meet users' needs? And what is the best way to choose the "right" access method(s) for a given individual? We report on typing speeds for various access methods across 57 studies, as well as experimental multimodal access methods across 34 papers. Results support the intuitive understanding that the access method affects the end user's experience and productivity. We also reviewed 33 papers and resources related to alternative access assessment and service provision. Existing evidence remains emerging and suggests that use of a systematic, user-centered approach to alternative access assessment may reap significant benefits, including better team performance and improved user satisfaction. Yet although many alternative access assessment resources are available, providers may not always use them. While today's alternative access methods can be an impactful means of enabling participation for people with physical disabilities, there is room for improvement, both in the access methods themselves, as well as their associated service provision and support. To identify and implement these improvements, the field needs research and development that is fully inclusive of people with disabilities in all phases of the work. We list some additional priorities for future work.

摘要

替代访问方法通过调整典型的键盘/鼠标/触摸屏界面或使用替代界面(如头部控制、眼动追踪器或开关)来适应个体的特定身体残疾。理想情况下,它们能让用户高效、舒适地使用任何计算设备,如笔记本电脑、平板电脑和智能手机。本文回顾相关文献以解决两个主要问题:现有访问方法在多大程度上满足用户需求?以及为特定个体选择“正确”访问方法的最佳方式是什么?我们报告了57项研究中各种访问方法的打字速度,以及34篇论文中的实验性多模态访问方法。结果支持了一种直观的认识,即访问方法会影响最终用户的体验和生产力。我们还回顾了33篇与替代访问评估和服务提供相关的论文和资源。现有证据仍在不断涌现,表明采用系统的、以用户为中心的方法进行替代访问评估可能会带来显著益处,包括更好的团队绩效和更高的用户满意度。然而,尽管有许多替代访问评估资源可用,但提供者可能并不总是使用它们。虽然当今的替代访问方法可以成为使身体残疾者参与其中的有效手段,但在访问方法本身及其相关的服务提供和支持方面仍有改进空间。为了识别和实施这些改进,该领域需要在工作的各个阶段都充分纳入残疾人的研究与开发。我们列出了未来工作的一些其他优先事项。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验