• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有精神病病史的心境正常的双相I型障碍患者的强化学习障碍。

Reinforcement learning impairment in individuals with euthymic bipolar I disorder with a history of psychosis.

作者信息

Wong Sandra Chi Yiu, Lo Heidi Ka Ying, Chau Anson Kai Chun, Ng Mary Chung Mun, Chan Joe Kwun Nam, Chu Ryan Sai Ting, Fang Catherine Zhiqian, Hui Christy Lai Ming, Chan Sherry Kit Wa, Lee Edwin Ho Ming, Lui Simon Sai Yu, Chang Wing Chung

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.

State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, the University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02022-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00406-025-02022-y
PMID:40397180
Abstract

Reinforcement-learning (RL) impairment is an important determinant of functional outcome in bipolar-disorder (BD). This study examined RL in 38 euthymic bipolar-I-disorder (BD-I) individuals aged 16-40 years who were treated within three years from first-episode mania with psychosis and 40 demographically-matched healthy-controls using a computerized RL-paradigm, which investigated rapid and gradual learning, and reward-driven and punishment-driven learning. Symptom severity and cognitive functions were assessed. Our results showed that BD-I individuals displayed lower lose-shift scores than controls (p = 0.03). There were no group differences in other rapid RL measures. Regarding overall RL, a repeated-measures ANOVA revealed main effect of group (F1,76 = 6.5, p = 0.03; controls performed better than patients), block (F2.87,218.45 = 43.7, p < 0.001; performance improving over time) and probability (F1,76 = 15.6, p < 0.001; better performance in 90% than in 80% condition). Post-hoc analysis revealed that controls performed better than BD-I individuals on loss-avoidance stimuli (p = 0.02). Better performance of controls relative to BD-I individuals on gain stimuli approached statistical significance (p = 0.06). No correlations of RL measures with symptoms, cognition or antipsychotic dose were observed. In conclusion, this study is among the few to examine RL impairment in euthymic BD-I with history of psychosis at a relatively early illness stage, and indicates that BD-I individuals displayed punishment-driven learning (i.e., negative RL) deficits compared with controls. Diminished punishment-sensitivity may indicate vulnerability to maladaptive behaviors, particularly in response to negative events or stress, and poorer functional impairment. Further research is required to clarify longitudinal trajectory of punishment-insensitivity and its relationship with psychosis and functional outcomes in the early-stage of BD.

摘要

强化学习(RL)障碍是双相情感障碍(BD)功能转归的重要决定因素。本研究使用计算机化RL范式,对38例年龄在16 - 40岁、首次躁狂发作伴精神病性症状后三年内接受治疗的双相I型障碍(BD-I)心境正常个体,以及40名人口统计学匹配的健康对照者进行了RL研究,该范式考察了快速和渐进学习,以及奖励驱动和惩罚驱动学习。评估了症状严重程度和认知功能。我们的结果显示,BD-I个体的损失转移得分低于对照组(p = 0.03)。在其他快速RL测量中,两组之间没有差异。关于总体RL,重复测量方差分析显示组间主效应(F1,76 = 6.5,p = 0.03;对照组表现优于患者)、区组(F2.87,218.45 = 43.7,p < 0.001;随着时间推移表现改善)和概率(F1,76 = 15.6,p < 0.001;90%条件下表现优于80%条件)。事后分析显示,在避免损失刺激方面,对照组表现优于BD-I个体(p = 0.02)。在获得刺激方面,对照组相对于BD-I个体的更好表现接近统计学显著性(p = 0.06)。未观察到RL测量与症状、认知或抗精神病药物剂量之间的相关性。总之,本研究是少数在相对早期疾病阶段对有精神病性症状史的BD-I心境正常个体的RL障碍进行研究的之一,表明BD-I个体与对照组相比存在惩罚驱动学习(即负性RL)缺陷。惩罚敏感性降低可能表明易出现适应不良行为,特别是对负面事件或压力的反应,以及功能损害更严重。需要进一步研究来阐明惩罚不敏感的纵向轨迹及其与BD早期精神病性症状和功能转归的关系。

相似文献

1
Reinforcement learning impairment in individuals with euthymic bipolar I disorder with a history of psychosis.有精神病病史的心境正常的双相I型障碍患者的强化学习障碍。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02022-y.
2
Predicting psychosis across diagnostic boundaries: Behavioral and computational modeling evidence for impaired reinforcement learning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with a history of psychosis.跨越诊断界限预测精神病:精神分裂症和有精神病病史的双相情感障碍中强化学习受损的行为和计算建模证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 Aug;124(3):697-708. doi: 10.1037/abn0000039.
3
Reward and punishment learning deficits among bipolar disorder subtypes.双相障碍亚型的奖惩学习缺陷。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Nov 1;340:694-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.075. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
4
Mild Reinforcement Learning Deficits in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis.首发精神病患者的轻度强化学习缺陷
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Nov;42(6):1476-1485. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw060. Epub 2016 May 13.
5
Altered Risk-Taking Behavior in Early-Stage Bipolar Disorder With a History of Psychosis.有精神病病史的早期双相情感障碍患者冒险行为的改变
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 18;12:763545. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.763545. eCollection 2021.
6
Explicit and implicit reinforcement learning across the psychosis spectrum.精神病谱系中的显性和隐性强化学习。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Jul;126(5):694-711. doi: 10.1037/abn0000259. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Reward and punishment learning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的奖惩学习。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Mar 2;381:112298. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112298. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
Reward Learning, Neurocognition, Social Cognition, and Symptomatology in Psychosis.精神病中的奖赏学习、神经认知、社会认知与症状学
Front Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 14;7:100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00100. eCollection 2016.
10
Reward Learning as a Potential Mechanism for Improvement in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Following Cognitive Remediation: Protocol for a Clinical, Nonrandomized, Pre-Post Pilot Study.奖励学习作为认知矫正后精神分裂症谱系障碍改善的潜在机制:一项临床、非随机、前后对照预试验研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jan 22;13:e52505. doi: 10.2196/52505.

本文引用的文献

1
Reinforcement learning and working memory in mood disorders: A computational analysis in a developmental transdiagnostic sample.心境障碍中的强化学习和工作记忆:发展性跨诊断样本中的计算分析。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jan 1;344:423-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.084. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Reward and punishment learning deficits among bipolar disorder subtypes.双相障碍亚型的奖惩学习缺陷。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Nov 1;340:694-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.075. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
How do bipolar disease states affect positive and negative emotion processing? Insights from a meta-analysis on the neural fingerprints of emotional processing.
双相情感障碍状态如何影响正性和负性情绪加工?情绪加工的神经指纹的元分析研究结果。
Bipolar Disord. 2023 Nov;25(7):540-553. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13341. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
Neural responses to monetary incentives in bipolar disorder.双相障碍患者对金钱奖励的神经反应。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102018. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102018. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
Reward and punishment learning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的奖惩学习。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Mar 2;381:112298. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112298. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Baseline and follow-up activity and functional connectivity in reward neural circuitries in offspring at risk for bipolar disorder.双相障碍风险后代的奖励神经回路中的基线和随访活动及功能连接。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Aug;44(9):1570-1578. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0339-2. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
Probabilistic reinforcement learning abnormalities and their correlates in adolescent bipolar disorders.青少年双相情感障碍的概率强化学习异常及其相关性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Nov;127(8):807-817. doi: 10.1037/abn0000388.
8
Characterizing decision-making and reward processing in bipolar disorder: A cluster analysis.双相障碍决策和奖赏加工特征:聚类分析。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jul;28(7):863-874. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 May 26.
9
Behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms of punishment: implications for psychiatric disorders.惩罚的行为和神经生物学机制:对精神障碍的影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jul;43(8):1639-1650. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0047-3. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
Explicit and implicit reinforcement learning across the psychosis spectrum.精神病谱系中的显性和隐性强化学习。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Jul;126(5):694-711. doi: 10.1037/abn0000259. Epub 2017 Apr 13.