Fisk Patrick, Hall Andrew K, O'Brien Michael, Cheung Warren J
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
CJEM. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00935-0.
In 2018, Royal College emergency medicine residency programs shifted to a competency-based medical education framework. This study sought to explore the impact of this transition on simulation-based education activities, including the use of simulation for assessment, in emergency medicine programs across Canada.
An interview guide was created by the authors evaluating the current role of simulation in emergency medicine programs based on the Core Components framework of competency-based medical education. Semi-structured interviews of emergency medicine simulation directors across Canada were conducted virtually between May 2022 and December 2022. Descriptive statistics of quantitative data are reported and qualitative responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Interviews represented 11/14 (78.5%) emergency medicine programs in Canada. Competency-based medical education national standards were commonly used to identify gaps in training experiences, particularly with high acuity low opportunity scenarios that could be addressed using simulation. Furthermore, competency-based medical education provided a framework where simulation curricula were revised and allowed for mapping of simulation scenarios to specific required training experiences and assessment requirements. All programs reported a new role of assessment in simulation largely in the form of entrustable professional activity assessments to satisfy the requirement of competency-based medical education. However, concerns were raised around the increasing role of assessment and its impact on psychological safety of the simulation learning environment.
The introduction of competency-based medical education has elevated the role of simulation as a means of assessing learner competencies. This shift has been largely positive, by facilitating resident assessment of required training experiences, but with some possible negative consequences related to the impact of assessments on the psychological safety traditionally afforded by the simulation environment. As such, educators must be intentional in how simulation is used in their program with particular attention given to the validity of assessments and the impact on safety of the learning environment.
2018年,皇家内科医学院急诊医学住院医师培训项目转向基于胜任力的医学教育框架。本研究旨在探讨这一转变对加拿大各地急诊医学项目中基于模拟的教育活动的影响,包括模拟在评估中的应用。
作者根据基于胜任力的医学教育的核心组成部分框架,创建了一份访谈指南,以评估模拟在急诊医学项目中的当前作用。2022年5月至2022年12月期间,对加拿大各地的急诊医学模拟主任进行了虚拟的半结构化访谈。报告定量数据的描述性统计结果,并使用主题分析对定性回答进行分析。
访谈涵盖了加拿大14个急诊医学项目中的11个(78.5%)。基于胜任力的医学教育国家标准通常用于识别培训经验中的差距,特别是对于那些可以通过模拟来解决的高敏锐度低机会场景。此外,基于胜任力的医学教育提供了一个框架,在此框架下修订了模拟课程,并允许将模拟场景映射到特定的所需培训经验和评估要求。所有项目都报告了模拟评估的新作用,主要形式是可托付专业活动评估,以满足基于胜任力的医学教育要求。然而,人们对评估作用的不断增加及其对模拟学习环境心理安全的影响表示担忧。
基于胜任力医学教育的引入提升了模拟作为评估学习者能力手段的作用。这一转变在很大程度上是积极的,它促进了住院医师对所需培训经验的评估,但也可能带来一些负面影响,即评估对传统上模拟环境所提供的心理安全产生影响。因此,教育工作者在其项目中使用模拟时必须深思熟虑,尤其要关注评估的有效性以及对学习环境安全性的影响。