文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

基于循证治疗的创伤后应激障碍诊断消失:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Loss of PTSD Diagnosis in Response to Evidence-Based Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Milligan Tiffany, Smolenski Derek, Lara-Ruiz Jose, Kelber Marija S

机构信息

Psychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, Virginia.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0695.


DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0695
PMID:40397424
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12096329/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: In recent decades, evidence-based psychotherapies to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been developed with robust evidence bases. However, efficacy observed in clinical trials is not always directly applicable to clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the percentage of patients in both military and veteran (hereafter milvet) and nonmilvet populations that lose their PTSD diagnosis after treatment. DATA SOURCES: We used the PTSD Repository to identify studies with adults with a DSM-IV/DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis based on a validated assessment. The repository, maintained by the US National Center for PTSD, is continually updated with randomized clinical trials and includes studies published from January 1988 on. STUDY SELECTION: For eligibility, PTSD had to be the primary treatment target, with psychotherapy applied as monotreatment. Eligible studies reported the number of participants who did not meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD posttreatment. When this review was initiated (October 2023), the repository contained 496 unique studies. Data analysis was completed from October 2023 to June 2024. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The repository follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines and uses Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0. We used mixed-effects logistic regression models to estimate diagnosis loss and incorporated milvet status and sex as covariates. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who no longer met criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD posttreatment as assessed by a validated instrument. RESULTS: We included 34 randomized clinical trials (N = 3208 participants). Point estimates of diagnosis loss across trauma-focused treatments for nonmilvet samples ranged from 65% to 86%. Milvet samples had lower proportions of diagnosis loss in studies of cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure compared to nonmilvet samples, ranging from 44% to 50%. There was substantial overlap between the covariates of milvet status and sex. An exploratory analysis identified eye movement desensitization and reprocessing as having the highest proportion of diagnosis loss, but there was substantial heterogeneity, and none of the studies were milvet-focused or conducted in the US. Also, 95% confidence intervals partially overlapped for all trauma-focused treatment estimates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review and meta-analysis contributes to the substantial literature on psychotherapeutic treatments for PTSD by meta-analyzing the probabilities of diagnosis loss for each psychotherapy. Diagnosis loss data are a relatively straightforward way to discuss potential benefits when initiating a therapy or when discussing potential barriers to progress in treatment.

摘要

重要性:近几十年来,已开发出具有充分证据基础的循证心理疗法来治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。然而,临床试验中观察到的疗效并不总是直接适用于临床实践。 目的:估计军人和退伍军人(以下简称军退人员)以及非军退人员群体中治疗后不再符合PTSD诊断标准的患者百分比。 数据来源:我们使用PTSD资料库来识别基于有效评估确诊为DSM-IV/DSM-5 PTSD的成人研究。该资料库由美国国家PTSD中心维护,通过随机临床试验不断更新,包括1988年1月以来发表的研究。 研究选择:为符合条件,PTSD必须是主要治疗目标,心理治疗作为单一治疗方法应用。符合条件的研究报告了治疗后不符合PTSD诊断标准的参与者数量。在本次综述启动时(2023年10月),该资料库包含496项独特研究。数据分析于2023年10月至2024年6月完成。 数据提取与综合:该资料库遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告指南,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0。我们使用混合效应逻辑回归模型来估计诊断消除情况,并将军退人员状态和性别作为协变量纳入。 主要结局与测量指标:主要结局是经有效工具评估,治疗后不再符合PTSD诊断标准的参与者比例。 结果:我们纳入了34项随机临床试验(N = 3208名参与者)。非军退样本中,针对创伤聚焦治疗的诊断消除点估计值范围为65%至86%。在认知加工疗法和延长暴露疗法的研究中,军退样本的诊断消除比例低于非军退样本,范围为44%至50%。军退人员状态和性别的协变量之间存在大量重叠。一项探索性分析发现,眼动脱敏再处理疗法的诊断消除比例最高,但存在很大异质性,且没有一项研究以军退人员为重点或在美国进行。此外,所有创伤聚焦治疗估计值的95%置信区间部分重叠。 结论与意义:本系统评价和Meta分析通过对每种心理治疗的诊断消除概率进行Meta分析,为关于PTSD心理治疗的大量文献做出了贡献。诊断消除数据是在开始治疗时或讨论治疗进展的潜在障碍时讨论潜在益处的一种相对直接的方式。

相似文献

[1]
Loss of PTSD Diagnosis in Response to Evidence-Based Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2025-5-21

[2]
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-4-4

[3]
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.

Syst Rev. 2024-11-26

[4]
Psychological therapies for children and adolescents exposed to trauma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-10-11

[5]
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-8-2

[6]
Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-12-12

[7]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9

[8]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19

[9]
Psychological therapies for the treatment of mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-7-5

[10]
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.

Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Prevalence of Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Serving Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Review.

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024-10

[2]
Randomized controlled trials of mind-body interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.

Front Psychol. 2024-1-24

[3]
US Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense 2023 Clinical Guideline for PTSD-Devolving Not Evolving.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2024-3-1

[4]
The impact of trauma-focused psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder on interpersonal functioning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

J Trauma Stress. 2023-6

[5]
Massed vs Intensive Outpatient Prolonged Exposure for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2023-1-3

[6]
Complex post-traumatic stress disorder.

Lancet. 2022-7-2

[7]
Guided, internet based, cognitive behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (RAPID).

BMJ. 2022-6-16

[8]
"Will it work for me?" Developing patient-friendly graphical displays of posttraumatic stress disorder treatment effectiveness.

J Trauma Stress. 2022-6

[9]
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in US Military Veterans: Results From the 2019-2020 National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2022-2-22

[10]
Comparison of Prolonged Exposure vs Cognitive Processing Therapy for Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among US Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-1-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索