• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“对我有效吗?”开发便于患者理解的创伤后应激障碍治疗效果图形显示。

"Will it work for me?" Developing patient-friendly graphical displays of posttraumatic stress disorder treatment effectiveness.

机构信息

National Center for PTSD-Executive Division, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2022 Jun;35(3):999-1010. doi: 10.1002/jts.22808. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1002/jts.22808
PMID:35261090
Abstract

The goal of this study was to create simple visual displays to help patients understand the benefits of evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We reviewed randomized trials of the most effective individual, trauma-focused psychotherapies and first-line antidepressants for adults with PTSD. The analytic sample included 65 treatment arms from 41 trials. We used binomial logistic regression to estimate the proportion of participants who lost their PTSD diagnosis at posttreatment and created a sample icon array to display these estimates. We provide a range of estimates (0-100) based on varying the percentage of the sample with a military affiliation. The percentage of participants who no longer met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD among civilian populations was 64.3% for trauma-focused treatment, 56.9% for SSRI/SNRI, and 16.7% for waitlist/minimal attention. For military populations, the proportions of participants who no longer met the diagnostic criteria were 44.2%, 36.7%, and 8.1%, respectively. We present icon arrays for 0%, 7%, 50%, and 100% military affiliation displaying 100 icons, a portion of which were shaded to indicate the number of participants that no longer met the PTSD criteria following treatment. After evidence-based treatment, between one third and two thirds of participants no longer met the PTSD criteria. Providers can use the icon array developed in this study with patients to facilitate communication regarding PTSD treatment effectiveness.

摘要

本研究的目的是创建简单的可视化显示,以帮助患者了解创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的循证治疗的益处。我们回顾了针对 PTSD 成人最有效的个体、创伤聚焦心理疗法和一线抗抑郁药的随机试验。分析样本包括 41 项试验中的 65 个治疗组。我们使用二项逻辑回归估计治疗后 PTSD 诊断丧失的参与者比例,并创建样本图标数组来显示这些估计值。我们根据具有军事背景的样本百分比提供了一系列估计值(0-100)。在针对平民人群的创伤聚焦治疗中,64.3%的参与者不再符合 PTSD 的诊断标准,56.9%的参与者符合 SSRI/SNRI,16.7%的参与者符合候补名单/最低关注。对于军事人群,不再符合诊断标准的参与者比例分别为 44.2%、36.7%和 8.1%。我们展示了 0%、7%、50%和 100%军事参与的图标数组,显示了 100 个图标,其中一部分被阴影表示治疗后不再符合 PTSD 标准的参与者人数。在循证治疗后,三分之一到三分之二的参与者不再符合 PTSD 标准。提供者可以使用本研究中开发的图标数组与患者进行沟通,以促进 PTSD 治疗效果的沟通。

相似文献

1
"Will it work for me?" Developing patient-friendly graphical displays of posttraumatic stress disorder treatment effectiveness.“对我有效吗?”开发便于患者理解的创伤后应激障碍治疗效果图形显示。
J Trauma Stress. 2022 Jun;35(3):999-1010. doi: 10.1002/jts.22808. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Psychotherapy for Military-Related PTSD: A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.军事相关 PTSD 的心理治疗:随机临床试验综述。
JAMA. 2015 Aug 4;314(5):489-500. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8370.
3
Individual Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Mantram Repetition: A Randomized Clinical Trial.个体创伤后应激障碍的曼特拉重复治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 1;175(10):979-988. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060611. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Effect of Group vs Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy in Active-Duty Military Seeking Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.团体与个体认知加工治疗对寻求创伤后应激障碍治疗的现役军人的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2729.
6
Effect of Prolonged Exposure Therapy Delivered Over 2 Weeks vs 8 Weeks vs Present-Centered Therapy on PTSD Symptom Severity in Military Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.为期2周、8周的延长暴露疗法与以当下为中心疗法对军事人员创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):354-364. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21242.
7
Comparison of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy, cognitive behavioral writing therapy, and wait-list in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder following single-incident trauma: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.比较单次创伤后儿童创伤后应激障碍的眼球运动脱敏再处理疗法、认知行为写作疗法和等待名单:一项多中心随机临床试验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;58(11):1219-1228. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12768. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Comparison of Accelerated Resolution Therapy (ART) for Treatment of Symptoms of PTSD and Sexual Trauma Between Civilian and Military Adults.平民与成年军人中加速解决疗法(ART)治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状和性创伤的比较
Mil Med. 2015 Sep;180(9):964-71. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00307.
9
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Dropout Among Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.创伤后应激障碍治疗中军人和退伍军人的脱落率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Stress. 2021 Aug;34(4):808-818. doi: 10.1002/jts.22653. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
Effect of Written Exposure Therapy vs Cognitive Processing Therapy on Increasing Treatment Efficiency Among Military Service Members With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.书面暴露疗法与认知加工疗法对提高创伤后应激障碍军人治疗效率的影响:一项随机非劣效性试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2140911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40911.

引用本文的文献

1
Loss of PTSD Diagnosis in Response to Evidence-Based Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于循证治疗的创伤后应激障碍诊断消失:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0695.
2
Beyond symptom reduction: Veterans' goals for posttraumatic stress disorder treatment.超越症状缓解:退伍军人创伤后应激障碍治疗的目标
J Trauma Stress. 2025 Apr;38(2):350-357. doi: 10.1002/jts.23121. Epub 2025 Jan 6.