Nyman Thomas J, Noromies Anna-Karin, Pompedda Francesco, Santtila Pekka, Antfolk Jan
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Arts, Psychology and Theology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323490. eCollection 2025.
In clinical in-person conditions, social presence, perceived empathy, and emotional engagement are related to positive outcomes. In online settings, it is unclear how these factors affect outcomes. Here, in 10-15-minute interviews, we investigated the influence of automation. Participants (N = 75) engaged in one of three possible interviews: live semi-scripted, live scripted, or video scripted. In the first two, participants communicated with a live interviewer and, in the third, with pre-recorded interviewer questions and answers. Emotion recognition software revealed that expressed joy differed between conditions (χ2(2) = 18.08, p < .001); both live conditions had higher scores (vs. video scripted). Self-rated perceived interviewer empathy also differed between conditions in the same way (F[2, 72] = 9.445, p < 0.001). We found a positive correlation between perceived empathy and expressed joy (r = .35; p < .01). In sum, automatized interviews differed in perceived empathy and expressed emotion compared with live interviews.
在临床面对面环境中,社交临场感、感知到的同理心和情感投入与积极结果相关。在在线环境中,尚不清楚这些因素如何影响结果。在此,我们通过10至15分钟的访谈,研究了自动化的影响。参与者(N = 75)参与了三种可能的访谈之一:现场半脚本式、现场脚本式或视频脚本式。在前两种访谈中,参与者与现场面试官交流,在第三种访谈中,参与者与预先录制的面试官问题和答案交流。情感识别软件显示,不同条件下表达的喜悦程度有所不同(χ2(2) = 18.08,p <.001);两种现场条件下的得分均高于视频脚本式条件。自我评定的对面试官同理心的感知在不同条件下也以相同方式存在差异(F[2, 72] = 9.445,p < 0.001)。我们发现感知到的同理心与表达的喜悦之间存在正相关(r =.35;p <.01)。总之,与现场访谈相比,自动化访谈在感知到的同理心和表达的情感方面存在差异。