• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measure what matters: A survey-based examination of health equity tracking and measurement practices across healthcare systems in the United States.衡量重要事项:基于调查对美国医疗系统中健康公平性追踪与衡量实践的考察。
PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323381. eCollection 2025.
2
Lessons learned about advancing healthcare equity from the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.从“质量对齐力量”倡议中汲取的推进医疗公平的经验教训。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s413-22.
3
Advancing health equity through partnerships of state Medicaid agencies, Medicaid managed care organizations, and health care delivery organizations.通过州医疗补助机构、医疗补助管理式医疗组织和医疗保健提供组织的伙伴关系,推进卫生公平。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1104843. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104843. eCollection 2023.
4
Launching Financial Incentives for Physician Groups to Improve Equity of Care by Patient Race and Ethnicity.为医生团体推出经济激励措施,以改善按患者种族和民族划分的医疗公平性。
Milbank Q. 2024 Dec;102(4):944-972. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12720. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Measuring Equity in Readmission as a Distinct Assessment of Hospital Performance.测量再入院公平性作为医院绩效的一个独特评估指标。
JAMA. 2024 Jan 9;331(2):111-123. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.24874.
6
Informing the American Academy of family Physician's Health Equity strategy - an environmental scan using the Delphi technique.为美国家庭医师学会的健康公平战略提供信息——运用德尔菲技术进行环境扫描。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 21;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1007-1.
7
A Study of Chief Nurse Executives Indicates Low Prioritization of Evidence-Based Practice and Shortcomings in Hospital Performance Metrics Across the United States.一项针对首席护士长的研究表明,在美国,循证实践的优先级较低,医院绩效指标存在缺陷。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Feb;13(1):6-14. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12133. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
An evaluation of gender equity in different models of primary care practices in Ontario.安大略省不同初级保健模式中的性别公平评估。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 23;10:151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-151.
10
Aligning the planning, development, and implementation of complex interventions to local contexts with an equity focus: application of the PRISM/RE-AIM Framework.将具有公平性重点的复杂干预措施的规划、开发和实施与当地情况相协调:PRISM/RE-AIM 框架的应用。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 27;23(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02130-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Dashboards for Advancing Health and Equity: Proving Their Promise?促进健康与公平的数据仪表盘:能否兑现其承诺?
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(6):889-892. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306847. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Developing an electronic health record-derived health equity dashboard to improve learner access to data and metrics.开发一个源自电子健康记录的健康公平仪表板,以改善学习者对数据和指标的获取。
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Sep 29;5(Suppl 1):S116-S120. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10682. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Development, implementation, and use of an "equity lens" integrated into an institutional quality scorecard.将“公平视角”纳入机构质量记分卡的开发、实施与应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 30;28(8):1785-1790. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab082.
4
Unequal care: Racial/ethnic disparities in neonatal intensive care delivery.不平等的护理:新生儿重症监护中的种族/民族差异。
Semin Perinatol. 2021 Jun;45(4):151411. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151411. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
5
Accountability Through Measurement: Using a Dashboard to Address Pediatric Health Disparities.通过测量实现问责制:利用仪表板解决儿科健康差距问题。
Pediatrics. 2020 Dec;146(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-024448.
6
Landscape of Health Systems in the United States.美国的卫生系统全景。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Aug;77(4):357-366. doi: 10.1177/1077558718823130. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

衡量重要事项:基于调查对美国医疗系统中健康公平性追踪与衡量实践的考察。

Measure what matters: A survey-based examination of health equity tracking and measurement practices across healthcare systems in the United States.

作者信息

Roth Hallie, De Marchis Emilia, Kopaskie Karyl, Restall Alexandra, Fichtenberg Caroline, Ray Shaifali, Azar Kristen M J

机构信息

Institute for Advancing Health Equity, Sutter Health, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323381. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323381
PMID:40397918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12094744/
Abstract

The objectives of this study were to understand how healthcare systems are incorporating equity into performance measurement and to uncover trends that inform healthcare systems' efforts to advance equity. A national cross-sectional survey was designed and administered during Spring 2022 to evaluate organizational efforts to track and measure health equity. The survey examined clinical and non-clinical health equity metrics/indicators tracked at the executive-level. We identified variation in how health equity is measured. Of the 27 respondents, seven (25.9%) were in the planning phase, nine (33.3%) were in early implementation, seven (25.9%) had practices implemented for one to two years, and four (14.8%) had practices implemented for three or more years. Most systems were tracking clinical metrics and evaluating metrics across subpopulations. Metrics related to chronic disease management and preventive care were mentioned most frequently (23.6% and 16.0%, respectively). Race/ethnicity was the most utilized demographic filter to evaluate equity. Systems at later stages of implementation were tracking fewer metrics, yet many systems were still in early stages of implementation. Health systems need specific and pragmatic guidance to develop and implement equity measures tracked at the executive level. Insights from current health system initiatives can help inform guidelines from national quality organizations for disparity reduction in clinical outcomes.

摘要

本研究的目的是了解医疗保健系统如何将公平性纳入绩效评估,并揭示可为医疗保健系统推进公平性工作提供信息的趋势。2022年春季设计并开展了一项全国性横断面调查,以评估组织在跟踪和衡量健康公平性方面所做的努力。该调查考察了在行政层面所跟踪的临床和非临床健康公平性指标。我们发现了在健康公平性衡量方式上存在差异。在27名受访者中,7人(25.9%)处于规划阶段,9人(33.3%)处于早期实施阶段,7人(25.9%)的实践已实施一至两年,4人(14.8%)的实践已实施三年或更长时间。大多数系统在跟踪临床指标并跨亚人群评估指标。与慢性病管理和预防保健相关的指标被提及的频率最高(分别为23.6%和16.0%)。种族/族裔是评估公平性时使用最多的人口统计学筛选因素。处于实施后期阶段的系统跟踪的指标较少,但许多系统仍处于早期实施阶段。卫生系统需要具体且务实的指导,以制定和实施在行政层面所跟踪的公平性措施。当前卫生系统举措的见解有助于为国家质量组织制定减少临床结果差异的指南提供信息。