Suppr超能文献

衡量重要事项:基于调查对美国医疗系统中健康公平性追踪与衡量实践的考察。

Measure what matters: A survey-based examination of health equity tracking and measurement practices across healthcare systems in the United States.

作者信息

Roth Hallie, De Marchis Emilia, Kopaskie Karyl, Restall Alexandra, Fichtenberg Caroline, Ray Shaifali, Azar Kristen M J

机构信息

Institute for Advancing Health Equity, Sutter Health, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323381. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to understand how healthcare systems are incorporating equity into performance measurement and to uncover trends that inform healthcare systems' efforts to advance equity. A national cross-sectional survey was designed and administered during Spring 2022 to evaluate organizational efforts to track and measure health equity. The survey examined clinical and non-clinical health equity metrics/indicators tracked at the executive-level. We identified variation in how health equity is measured. Of the 27 respondents, seven (25.9%) were in the planning phase, nine (33.3%) were in early implementation, seven (25.9%) had practices implemented for one to two years, and four (14.8%) had practices implemented for three or more years. Most systems were tracking clinical metrics and evaluating metrics across subpopulations. Metrics related to chronic disease management and preventive care were mentioned most frequently (23.6% and 16.0%, respectively). Race/ethnicity was the most utilized demographic filter to evaluate equity. Systems at later stages of implementation were tracking fewer metrics, yet many systems were still in early stages of implementation. Health systems need specific and pragmatic guidance to develop and implement equity measures tracked at the executive level. Insights from current health system initiatives can help inform guidelines from national quality organizations for disparity reduction in clinical outcomes.

摘要

本研究的目的是了解医疗保健系统如何将公平性纳入绩效评估,并揭示可为医疗保健系统推进公平性工作提供信息的趋势。2022年春季设计并开展了一项全国性横断面调查,以评估组织在跟踪和衡量健康公平性方面所做的努力。该调查考察了在行政层面所跟踪的临床和非临床健康公平性指标。我们发现了在健康公平性衡量方式上存在差异。在27名受访者中,7人(25.9%)处于规划阶段,9人(33.3%)处于早期实施阶段,7人(25.9%)的实践已实施一至两年,4人(14.8%)的实践已实施三年或更长时间。大多数系统在跟踪临床指标并跨亚人群评估指标。与慢性病管理和预防保健相关的指标被提及的频率最高(分别为23.6%和16.0%)。种族/族裔是评估公平性时使用最多的人口统计学筛选因素。处于实施后期阶段的系统跟踪的指标较少,但许多系统仍处于早期实施阶段。卫生系统需要具体且务实的指导,以制定和实施在行政层面所跟踪的公平性措施。当前卫生系统举措的见解有助于为国家质量组织制定减少临床结果差异的指南提供信息。

相似文献

8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验