Suppr超能文献

对新冠疫苗接种行为的全面分析:宗教、信息来源、政治倾向和人口因素的影响

A comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 vaccination behavior: The influence of religion, information sources, political leanings, and demographic factors.

作者信息

Över Defne, Santana Emilce, Amaral Ernesto F L, Lakkimsetti Chaitanya, Kelley Anna Estelle, Espinoza Dulce Angelica

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323815. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the crucial role of vaccines in controlling the virus. Despite their effectiveness, however, vaccine hesitancy remained a challenge, particularly within certain population groups. This multi-disciplinary study investigates the diverse socio-demographic factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination decisions in the United States. Through a nationally representative survey of 5,240 people, the research explores the interplay of information sources, religious beliefs, political party, and demographic characteristics of the respondents. Our findings reveal associations of main sources of information with vaccination likelihood, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demonstrating the highest association with full vaccination. Religious beliefs are significant determinants, with Evangelical Protestants exhibiting the lowest vaccination rates. We also highlight the intricate relationship between political leanings and vaccination behavior, emphasizing higher levels of vaccination among Democrats. Demographic variables, including age, education, gender, and race/ethnicity, also play pivotal roles, exposing disparities in vaccination access and decisions. In particular, older individuals and those with higher levels of education show a greater inclination to achieve full vaccination, while women and African Americans are less likely to attain complete vaccination. Lastly, while major ethnoracial groups seem to respond to different sources of information similarly, there are also nuanced differences, such as Asians being especially likely to be fully vaccinated if they depend on the CDC or other health sources while more disadvantaged groups seem less responsive to these sources. Overall, this research provides a comprehensive analysis of the nuanced factors shaping vaccination behavior. It contributes valuable knowledge to public health strategies, emphasizing the need for targeted communication campaigns tailored to diverse communities.

摘要

新冠疫情凸显了疫苗在控制病毒方面的关键作用。然而,尽管疫苗有效,但疫苗犹豫仍然是一个挑战,尤其是在某些人群中。这项多学科研究调查了影响美国新冠疫苗接种决策的各种社会人口因素。通过对5240人进行的全国代表性调查,该研究探讨了信息来源、宗教信仰、政党以及受访者人口特征之间的相互作用。我们的研究结果揭示了主要信息来源与疫苗接种可能性之间的关联,疾病控制与预防中心与全程接种的关联度最高。宗教信仰是重要的决定因素,福音派新教徒的疫苗接种率最低。我们还强调了政治倾向与疫苗接种行为之间的复杂关系,强调民主党人的疫苗接种率更高。人口变量,包括年龄、教育程度、性别和种族/族裔,也起着关键作用,揭示了疫苗接种机会和决策方面的差异。特别是,老年人和受教育程度较高的人表现出更高的全程接种倾向,而女性和非裔美国人完成全程接种的可能性较小。最后,虽然主要种族群体对不同信息来源的反应似乎相似,但也存在细微差别,例如,如果亚洲人依赖疾病控制与预防中心或其他健康信息来源,他们尤其有可能完成全程接种,而处境较为不利的群体对这些信息来源的反应似乎较小。总体而言,这项研究对影响疫苗接种行为的细微因素进行了全面分析。它为公共卫生战略贡献了宝贵的知识,强调了针对不同社区开展有针对性宣传活动的必要性。

相似文献

2
The role of religion and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in England.
Vaccine. 2024 May 10;42(13):3215-3219. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
6
Religious group membership and conspiracy beliefs influence vaccine uptake: Insights from 20 European countries.
Vaccine. 2025 Apr 19;53:127086. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127086. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
7
Adherence to COVID-19 vaccination recommendations and vaccine hesitancy in US blood donors.
Transfusion. 2024 Dec;64(12):2314-2324. doi: 10.1111/trf.18051. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
9
Changes in general and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among U.S. adults from 2021 to 2022.
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2357230. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2357230. Epub 2024 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
A Scoping Review on Gender/Sex Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions and Uptake in the United States.
Am J Health Promot. 2024 Feb;38(2):242-274. doi: 10.1177/08901171231200778. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Impact of Political Leaning on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Network-Based Multiple Mediation Analysis.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 9;15(8):e43232. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43232. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Explaining the gender gap in COVID-19 vaccination attitudes.
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Jun 1;33(3):490-495. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad052.
4
Profiles of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy by race and ethnicity in eastern Pennsylvania.
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 6;18(2):e0280245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280245. eCollection 2023.
5
Between Healthcare Practitioners and Clergy: Evangelicals and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11120. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711120.
6
Racial/ethnic and nativity disparities in U.S. Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy during vaccine rollout and factors that explain them.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;307:115183. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115183. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
Gender, socioeconomic status, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the US: An intersectionality approach.
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Jun;44(6):953-971. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13474. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
A meta-analysis of COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and demographic characteristics in the United States.
Public Health. 2022 Jun;207:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
9
Potential factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0265496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265496. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验