Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The University of Texas, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Jun;44(6):953-971. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13474. Epub 2022 May 2.
Previous research on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy lacks a gender perspective, and it is unclear whether gender intersects with socioeconomic status to co-produce inequalities in people's intent to take vaccines. The current study draws on intersectionality theory and uses data from the 2021 US Household Pulse Survey (n = 50,359). Both bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses were conducted. The results suggest that American women had a higher vaccine hesitancy rate than men. Gender interacts with socioeconomic status to shape people's vaccine hesitancy in a complex way. Specifically, women living in poverty or currently working were more vaccine-hesitant, while poverty and employment status did not affect men's vaccine hesitancy. However, not having a college education contributed to both women's and men's COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Moreover, women were more worried about the safety of the vaccine, but men's hesitancy tended to be driven by lower perceptions of COVID-19 dangers and belief in conspiratorial claims.
先前针对 2019 冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)疫苗犹豫的研究缺乏性别视角,也不清楚性别是否与社会经济地位相互交织,共同导致人们接种疫苗的意愿出现不平等。本研究借鉴交叉性理论,并利用 2021 年美国家庭脉搏调查的数据(n=50359)。进行了双变量和多变量统计分析。结果表明,美国女性的疫苗犹豫率高于男性。性别与社会经济地位以复杂的方式相互作用,塑造人们的疫苗犹豫。具体而言,生活贫困或正在工作的女性更不愿意接种疫苗,而贫困和就业状况并不影响男性对疫苗的犹豫。然而,没有大学学历既导致了女性也导致了男性对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫。此外,女性更担心疫苗的安全性,但男性的犹豫往往是由于对 COVID-19 危险的感知较低以及对阴谋论的信任。