Elnakka Lina, Golob Deeb Janina, Carrico Caroline K, Jadhav Aniket, Vaddi Anusha, Deeb George R
J Oral Implantol. 2025 Aug 8;51(4):337-345. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00155.
Titanium-reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene (Ti-PTFE) and titanium mesh (Ti-mesh) are used to augment atrophic alveolar ridges to facilitate the placement of dental implants. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the average vertical and horizontal bone gain and outcomes between Ti-PTFE and Ti-mesh techniques. To assess outcomes, retrospective chart review and superimposition of preoperative and postoperative cone beam computerized tomography scans were used. The vertical component of the augmented site (L1) was assessed along a vertical bisecting line. Horizontal width was measured in buccolingual dimension at 3-mm intervals (W1-6) along the L1. Paired t tests were used to compare bone measurements at each location, and analysis of covariance models were used to compare the grafting methods. Successes were compared with chi-squared tests. Forty-eight ridge augmentation cases with 70 sites were included: 25 Ti-PTFE with 35 sites and 23 Ti-mesh with 35 sites. The average gain in length (L1) was statistically significant for Ti-PTFE, 0.75 mm, and nonstatistically significant for Ti-mesh, 0.61 mm. The average increase in width for Ti-PTFE was 2.05 mm, whereas for Ti-mesh, it was 2.42 mm. After adjusting for preoperative bone levels, Ti-PTFE had significantly greater gains at W1 than Ti-mesh. Seventy-six percent of the cases were considered successes with 74% for Ti-PTFE and 77% for Ti-mesh with no statistically significant difference. Both ridge augmentation techniques resulted in reliable horizontal bone gains, whereas a wide range of outcomes was observed for vertical bone gains.
钛增强聚四氟乙烯(Ti-PTFE)和钛网(Ti-mesh)用于增大萎缩性牙槽嵴,以便于植入牙种植体。本研究旨在评估和比较Ti-PTFE和钛网技术之间的平均垂直和水平骨增量及效果。为评估效果,采用回顾性病历审查以及术前和术后锥形束计算机断层扫描的叠加分析。在增大部分的垂直平分线处评估垂直分量(L1)。沿L1在颊舌方向以3毫米间隔测量水平宽度(W1-6)。采用配对t检验比较每个位置的骨测量值,并使用协方差分析模型比较植骨方法。采用卡方检验比较成功率。纳入了48例牙槽嵴增大病例共70个部位:25例Ti-PTFE共35个部位,23例钛网共35个部位。Ti-PTFE的长度平均增加(L1)具有统计学意义,为0.75毫米,而钛网为0.61毫米,无统计学意义。Ti-PTFE的宽度平均增加2.05毫米,而钛网为2.42毫米。在对术前骨水平进行校正后,Ti-PTFE在W1处的增量显著大于钛网。7
6%的病例被认为成功,Ti-PTFE为74%,钛网为77%,无统计学显著差异。两种牙槽嵴增大技术均能可靠地实现水平骨增量,而垂直骨增量的结果差异较大。