Troeltzsch Markus, Troeltzsch Matthias, Kauffmann Philipp, Gruber Rudolph, Brockmeyer Phillipp, Moser Norman, Rau Anna, Schliephake Henning
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. H. Schliephake), University of Goettingen, Germany.
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Ludwig - Maximilians - University of Munich, Germany.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;44(10):1618-1629. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
To evaluate the efficacy of grafting materials in lateral and vertical ridge augmentations.
A systematic review of the literature on the clinical use of grafting materials of the years 1995 to April 2015 was conducted using electronic search of PubMed and Cochrane libraries and hand search of eight print journals. A total of 184 papers were included, comprising 6182 patients. Parameters evaluated were observation period [months], bone formation [histologic area%], defect fill [%], horizontal and vertical gain [mm], loss of augmented volume [mm], complication rate [%], and implant survival rate [%]. Results are expressed as weighted means ± SD.
Results were obtained after a weighted mean observation period of 27.4 months (range 3-168 months). Bone formation in the augmented areas varied from 33.2 ± 14.9% for allogeneic grafts to 56.0 ± 25.6% for mixtures of autogenous and other grafting materials. Defect fill in dehiscence defects ranged from 51.0 ± 13.6% (synthetic) to 85.8 ± 13.4% (xenogeneic) for the different materials, with an overall weighted mean of 79.8 ± 18.7%. Weighted mean horizontal gain for all particulate grafting materials was 3.7 ± 1.2 mm, with variation between 2.2 ± 1.2 mm (synthetic) and 4.5 ± 1.0 mm (mixtures of autogenous bone with allogeneic/xenogeneic grafting material) without statistical significance. Weighted overall mean vertical gain was 3.7 ± 1.4 mm. Vertical gain was substantially higher when space-making barrier materials such as titanium meshes were used; however this was also associated with strong increase in complication rate. Block grafts achieved higher horizontal gain by approximately 1 mm. The use of block grafts achieved significantly increased vertical gain compared to particulate material only when autogenous block grafts from extraoral donor sites were used.
Horizontal and vertical gain by 3.7 mm on average can be achieved using particulate materials. This can be increased by using titanium meshes. Substantial vertical gains beyond this dimension require the use of extraoral bone block grafts.
评估移植材料在牙槽嵴侧方和垂直增高术中的疗效。
通过电子检索PubMed和Cochrane图书馆,并手工检索8种印刷期刊,对1995年至2015年4月期间有关移植材料临床应用的文献进行系统综述。共纳入184篇论文,涉及6182例患者。评估的参数包括观察期[月]、骨形成[组织学面积%]、缺损填充率[%]、水平和垂直骨增量[mm]、增高体积的减少量[mm]、并发症发生率[%]以及种植体存活率[%]。结果以加权平均值±标准差表示。
加权平均观察期为27.4个月(范围3 - 168个月)后获得结果。增高区域的骨形成情况各不相同,同种异体移植物为33.2±14.9%,自体与其他移植材料的混合物为56.0±25.6%。不同材料在裂开性缺损中的缺损填充率范围为51.0±13.6%(合成材料)至85.8±13.4%(异种材料),总体加权平均值为79.8±18.7%。所有颗粒状移植材料的加权平均水平骨增量为3.7±1.2mm,其中合成材料为2.2±1.2mm,自体骨与同种异体/异种移植材料的混合物为4.5±1.0mm,差异无统计学意义。加权总体平均垂直骨增量为3.7±1.4mm。当使用诸如钛网等空间制造屏障材料时,垂直骨增量显著更高;然而,这也伴随着并发症发生率的大幅增加。块状移植物的水平骨增量高出约1mm。仅当使用来自口外供区的自体块状移植物时,与颗粒材料相比,块状移植物的垂直骨增量显著增加。
使用颗粒材料平均可实现3.7mm的水平和垂直骨增量。使用钛网可增加骨增量。超过此尺寸的显著垂直骨增量需要使用口外骨块移植物。