Kumar Yogesh, Nirangjhana Sivasubramanian
Department of Physiology, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Apr 30;14:139. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_944_24. eCollection 2025.
In the vast expanse of academic publishing, researchers face a dual challenge of identifying legitimate avenues for dissemination while avoiding predatory journals. Predatory publishing, characterized by lax peer review, deceptive practices, and exorbitant fees, jeopardizes scholarly integrity and career progression. This paper explores the intricacies of predatory publishing, delineates its implications for researchers, and presents pragmatic strategies to navigate this landscape adeptly. Understanding the hallmarks of predatory journals, such as deficient peer review and misleading indexing claims, is paramount. Researchers risk reputational damage and hinder scientific progress by engaging with such venues. Moreover, the financial burden and ethical dilemmas associated with predatory publishing exacerbate the predicament. To combat this menace, researchers must employ vigilant vetting processes, consulting resources like Beall's List and DOAJ, while critically evaluating journal metrics and practices. Trusted mentors and disciplinary societies can offer invaluable guidance in identifying reputable outlets. Scrutinizing submission guidelines, peer-review procedures, and indexing status, alongside adherence to ethical standards, helps discern predatory from legitimate journals. By prioritizing transparency, integrity, and collaboration, researchers can navigate the complex publishing landscape, contributing to the advancement of knowledge while safeguarding scholarly integrity.
在学术出版的广阔领域中,研究人员面临着双重挑战:既要找到合理的传播途径,又要避开掠夺性期刊。掠夺性出版的特点是同行评审宽松、存在欺骗行为且收费过高,它损害了学术诚信和职业发展。本文探讨了掠夺性出版的复杂性,阐述了其对研究人员的影响,并提出了切实可行的策略,以便在这一领域中巧妙应对。了解掠夺性期刊的特征,如同行评审不足和索引声明误导性等,至关重要。研究人员若与这类期刊合作,会面临声誉受损的风险,并阻碍科学进步。此外,与掠夺性出版相关的经济负担和伦理困境加剧了这一困境。为了应对这一威胁,研究人员必须采用严格的审查程序,参考诸如贝亚德列表和开放获取期刊目录等资源,同时批判性地评估期刊指标和做法。值得信赖的导师和学科协会在识别声誉良好的期刊方面可以提供宝贵的指导。仔细审查投稿指南、同行评审程序和索引状态,同时遵守道德标准,有助于区分掠夺性期刊和正规期刊。通过优先考虑透明度、诚信和合作,研究人员可以在复杂的出版领域中找准方向,在维护学术诚信的同时为知识的进步做出贡献。