Suppr超能文献

糖尿病足溃疡治疗方式及其对愈合进程影响的系统评价与荟萃分析

A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment modalities and their impact on the healing progression of diabetic foot ulcers.

作者信息

Zhang Yanbiao, Huang Bo, Wang Ting, Dong Hongfei, Huang Xi, Li Xianhui

机构信息

Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command No. 270, Rongdu Avenue, Jinniu Distric, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Int J Burns Trauma. 2025 Apr 25;15(2):41-52. doi: 10.62347/WVEM7973. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common and serious complication of diabetes mellitus, which occurs in 15-25% of diabetic patients at some point in their lives. However, most of the Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) do not heal with conventional methods of wound care and progress to become chronic, non-healing ulcers with high morbidity, mortality, and economic stakes. Some of the recent techniques in the management of ulcers include Systemic Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (s-HBOT), Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy, and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) that aim at improving the ulcer healing rate and minimize the risks of amputation.

OBJECTIVE

This work intends to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the effectiveness, healing time and effect on amputation of these advanced treatment modalities on management of DFUs.

METHODS

The present study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Information was obtained from 10 researches that considered different types of DFU treatment. The major end-points studied were rates of ulcer healing, time to heal and frequency of lower extremity amputations. The meta-analysis was conducted using R statistical software and the synthesis of results was done using forest and funnel plots.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis showed that NPWT significantly improved ulcer healing rates (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.09-3.05) and reduced time to healing (Mean Diff = -22 days, 95% CI: -41.60 to -2.40). HBOT, particularly s-HBOT, demonstrated a substantial reduction in amputation rates (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: -0.11-0.28). PRP also showed promise, especially in reducing healing time (Mean Diff = -25 days, 95% CI: -34.80 to -15.20), though with more variability across studies.

CONCLUSION

The results of NPWT were found to be significantly superior for ulcer closure and reduced healing time making it the treatment of choice for DFUs. Compared to controls, both HBOT and s-HBOT were strikingly effective in averting amputations. PRP had the possibility of being used as supplementary treatment especially in treatment with regard to the aspect of promotion of healing. Collectively, these results suggest that it is possible to use such advanced therapies to enhance the treatment of DFU; however, more effort is required to refine the protocols of such therapies and determine the sources of a differential response.

摘要

背景

糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是糖尿病常见且严重的并发症,15% - 25%的糖尿病患者在其一生中的某个阶段会出现该病症。然而,大多数糖尿病足溃疡采用传统伤口护理方法无法愈合,会发展成慢性、不愈合溃疡,具有高发病率、高死亡率和高经济成本。溃疡治疗的一些最新技术包括全身高压氧疗法(s - HBOT)、富血小板血浆(PRP)、真空辅助闭合(VAC)疗法和负压伤口疗法(NPWT),这些疗法旨在提高溃疡愈合率并降低截肢风险。

目的

本研究旨在对这些先进治疗方式在糖尿病足溃疡管理中的有效性、愈合时间及截肢影响进行全面的荟萃分析。

方法

本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,用于报告随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。从10项考虑不同类型糖尿病足溃疡治疗的研究中获取信息。研究的主要终点是溃疡愈合率、愈合时间和下肢截肢频率。使用R统计软件进行荟萃分析,并使用森林图和漏斗图进行结果综合分析。

结果

汇总分析表明,负压伤口疗法(NPWT)显著提高了溃疡愈合率(OR = 2.07,95% CI:1.09 - 3.05)并缩短了愈合时间(平均差值 = - 22天,95% CI: - 41.60至 - 2.40)。高压氧疗法(HBOT),尤其是全身高压氧疗法(s - HBOT),截肢率大幅降低(OR = 0.08,95% CI: - 0.11 - 0.28)。富血小板血浆(PRP)也显示出前景,特别是在缩短愈合时间方面(平均差值 = - 25天,95% CI: - 34.80至 - 15.20),尽管不同研究之间存在较大差异。

结论

发现负压伤口疗法(NPWT)在溃疡闭合和缩短愈合时间方面效果显著优于其他方法,使其成为糖尿病足溃疡的首选治疗方法。与对照组相比,高压氧疗法(HBOT)和全身高压氧疗法(s - HBOT)在避免截肢方面都非常有效。富血小板血浆(PRP)有可能用作辅助治疗,特别是在促进愈合方面。总体而言,这些结果表明可以使用此类先进疗法来加强糖尿病足溃疡的治疗;然而,需要更多努力来完善这些疗法的方案并确定差异反应的来源。

相似文献

9
Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review.富血小板血浆治疗糖尿病足溃疡:系统评价。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 18;14:1256081. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1256081. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

3
4
Debridement of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡清创术。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022 Dec;11(12):666-686. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0016. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
9
Update on management of diabetic foot ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡的治疗进展。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jan;1411(1):153-165. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13569.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验