• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of extraprostatic extension on prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion.前列腺外扩展对伴有精囊侵犯的前列腺癌的预后影响。
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2025 Apr 25;13(2):186-193. doi: 10.62347/EDGZ4295. eCollection 2025.
2
Seminal vesicle invasion combined with extraprostatic extension is associated with higher frequency of biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastasis than seminal vesicle invasion alone: Proposal for further pT3 prostate cancer subclassification.精囊侵犯伴或不伴前列腺外侵犯与生化复发和淋巴结转移的频率较高相关,比单纯精囊侵犯更具侵袭性:进一步前列腺癌 pT3 亚分类的建议。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020 Dec;49:151611. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151611. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
Comparison of MRI-Based Staging and Pathologic Staging for Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.基于 MRI 的分期与病理分期预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Dec;221(6):773-787. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29609. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Retrospective Cohort Analysis from a High-Volume Center of Prognostic Factors Affecting Biochemical Relapse in Patients with Encapsulated, Margin-Negative, Isolated Seminal Vesicle Invasion After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Novel Study.回顾性队列分析:机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后包膜完整、切缘阴性、孤立性精囊侵犯患者生化复发的预后因素——一项新的研究。
J Endourol. 2020 Apr;34(4):441-449. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0714. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
5
The pathway of isolated seminal vesicle invasion has a different impact on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.孤立精囊侵犯的途径对根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术后生化复发有不同的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Jun;41(6):293.e9-293.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 May 2.
6
Bilateral Seminal Vesicle Invasion as a Strong Prognostic Indicator in T3b Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Comprehensive, Multicenter, Long-term Follow-up Study.双侧精囊侵犯作为T3b期前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的强预后指标:一项全面、多中心、长期随访研究
Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jul;56(3):885-892. doi: 10.4143/crt.2023.1264. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
7
Effect of Preoperative Risk Group Stratification on Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Adverse Pathologic Findings at Radical Prostatectomy.术前风险分组分层对根治性前列腺切除术中病理结果不良患者肿瘤学结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 7;11(10):e0164497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164497. eCollection 2016.
8
Bilateral Seminal Vesicle Invasion Is Not Associated with Worse Outcomes in Locally Advanced Prostate Carcinoma.双侧精囊侵犯与局部晚期前列腺癌的不良预后无关。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 5;58(8):1057. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081057.
9
The Clinical Impact of pT3a Lesions in Patients With pT3b Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术的pT3b期前列腺癌患者中pT3a病变的临床影响
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 May 1;146(5):619-625. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0069-OA.
10
Diagnostic Performance of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scale Scores to Determine Extraprostatic Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion With Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate.前瞻性分配 Likert 量表评分对前列腺多参数 MRI 评估前列腺外扩展和精囊侵犯的诊断性能。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar;212(3):576-581. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20320. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The Absolute Volume of Gleason Pattern 4 on Radical Prostatectomy Is More Strongly Associated With Advanced Stage and Biochemical Recurrence Than Gleason Grade Groups.前列腺癌根治术中 Gleason 4 级的绝对体积比 Gleason 分级组与晚期疾病和生化复发的相关性更强。
J Urol. 2025 Jun;213(6):722-729. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004484. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
A simple risk stratification model for prostate cancer using histopathologic findings of radical prostatectomy.基于根治性前列腺切除术的组织病理学检查结果的前列腺癌简单风险分层模型。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2024 Oct 3;162(4):420-425. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae049.
3
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2024 更新。第一部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2024 Aug;86(2):148-163. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
4
Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification by Simple Scoring of the Current pT3 Lesions: A Proposal for a New Pathologic T-Staging System.基于当前 pT3 病变的简单评分进行前列腺癌风险分层:新病理 T 分期系统的建议。
Mod Pathol. 2024 Mar;37(3):100429. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100429. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
5
2022 Update on Prostate Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factors-A Systematic Review.2022 年前列腺癌流行病学和风险因素的更新:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2023 Aug;84(2):191-206. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 May 16.
6
The pathway of isolated seminal vesicle invasion has a different impact on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.孤立精囊侵犯的途径对根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术后生化复发有不同的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Jun;41(6):293.e9-293.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
The Clinical Significance of pT3a Lesions as Well as Unilateral Versus Bilateral Invasion Into the Seminal Vesicle in Men With pT3b Prostate Cancer: A Proposal for a New pT3b Subclassification.pT3a病变以及pT3b前列腺癌患者单侧与双侧精囊侵犯的临床意义:关于新的pT3b亚分类的提议
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023 Nov 1;147(11):1261-1267. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0244-OA.
8
Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy plus short-term androgen deprivation therapy in men with localised prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 17): a randomised, phase 3 trial.根治性前列腺切除术后局部前列腺癌男性患者的辅助放疗与早期挽救性放疗加短期雄激素剥夺治疗的比较(GETUG-AFU 17):一项随机、3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1341-1352. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30454-X.
9
Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (TROG 08.03/ANZUP RAVES): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.辅助放疗与根治性前列腺切除术后早期挽救性放疗(TROG 08.03/ANZUP RAVES):一项随机、对照、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1331-1340. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30456-3.
10
Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.根治性前列腺切除术后放疗时机(RADICALS-RT):一项随机对照 3 期试验。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1413-1421. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31553-1. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

前列腺外扩展对伴有精囊侵犯的前列腺癌的预后影响。

Prognostic impact of extraprostatic extension on prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion.

作者信息

Yanai Yoshinori, Kosaka Takeo, Mikami Shuji, Takeda Toshikazu, Matsumoto Kazuhiro, Masuda Takeshi, Oya Mototsugu

机构信息

Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital Saitama 333-0861, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2025 Apr 25;13(2):186-193. doi: 10.62347/EDGZ4295. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.62347/EDGZ4295
PMID:40401002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12089220/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) are unfavorable factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy; however, some patients with SVI survive for a long duration without experiencing BCR after prostatectomy in absence of adjuvant therapy. This study aimed to clarify the heterogeneity of locally advanced prostate cancers to better understand prognosis in patients with SVI.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 patients with SVI who underwent radical prostatectomy at two institutions. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the preoperative clinical and postoperative pathological variables as predictors of BCR. We also used Kaplan-Meier and competing risk regression analysis to assess the cumulative incidence and risk of BCR. After excluding patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, 55 patients with SVI were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

BCR occurred in 31 of these patients (56.3%). We found that Grade group and positive EPE were predictors of BCR in patients with SVI ( < 0.001 and = 0.002, respectively). Using the multivariate model, EPE was significantly associated with BCR in patients with SVI (hazard ratio: 5.402; 95% confidence interval, 1.247-23.405; = 0.012). Patients who were negative for EPE had significantly lower BCR rates ( = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the patients with SVI tumors, prognosis might be different depending on presence or absence of EPE.

摘要

目的

前列腺外扩展(EPE)和精囊侵犯(SVI)是根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发(BCR)的不良因素;然而,一些SVI患者在未接受辅助治疗的前列腺切除术后长时间生存且未发生BCR。本研究旨在阐明局部晚期前列腺癌的异质性,以更好地了解SVI患者的预后。

方法

我们回顾性分析了两家机构120例接受根治性前列腺切除术的SVI患者的病历。采用多因素logistic回归分析评估术前临床和术后病理变量作为BCR的预测因素。我们还使用Kaplan-Meier法和竞争风险回归分析来评估BCR的累积发生率和风险。在排除接受新辅助或辅助治疗的患者后,本研究纳入了55例SVI患者。

结果

这些患者中有31例(56.3%)发生了BCR。我们发现分级组和EPE阳性是SVI患者BCR的预测因素(分别为<0.001和=0.002)。使用多因素模型,EPE与SVI患者的BCR显著相关(风险比:5.402;95%置信区间,1.247 - 23.405;=0.012)。EPE阴性的患者BCR发生率显著较低(=0.002)。

结论

在SVI肿瘤患者中,预后可能因是否存在EPE而有所不同。