Yanai Yoshinori, Kosaka Takeo, Mikami Shuji, Takeda Toshikazu, Matsumoto Kazuhiro, Masuda Takeshi, Oya Mototsugu
Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital Saitama 333-0861, Japan.
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2025 Apr 25;13(2):186-193. doi: 10.62347/EDGZ4295. eCollection 2025.
Extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) are unfavorable factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy; however, some patients with SVI survive for a long duration without experiencing BCR after prostatectomy in absence of adjuvant therapy. This study aimed to clarify the heterogeneity of locally advanced prostate cancers to better understand prognosis in patients with SVI.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 patients with SVI who underwent radical prostatectomy at two institutions. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the preoperative clinical and postoperative pathological variables as predictors of BCR. We also used Kaplan-Meier and competing risk regression analysis to assess the cumulative incidence and risk of BCR. After excluding patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, 55 patients with SVI were enrolled in this study.
BCR occurred in 31 of these patients (56.3%). We found that Grade group and positive EPE were predictors of BCR in patients with SVI ( < 0.001 and = 0.002, respectively). Using the multivariate model, EPE was significantly associated with BCR in patients with SVI (hazard ratio: 5.402; 95% confidence interval, 1.247-23.405; = 0.012). Patients who were negative for EPE had significantly lower BCR rates ( = 0.002).
Among the patients with SVI tumors, prognosis might be different depending on presence or absence of EPE.
前列腺外扩展(EPE)和精囊侵犯(SVI)是根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发(BCR)的不良因素;然而,一些SVI患者在未接受辅助治疗的前列腺切除术后长时间生存且未发生BCR。本研究旨在阐明局部晚期前列腺癌的异质性,以更好地了解SVI患者的预后。
我们回顾性分析了两家机构120例接受根治性前列腺切除术的SVI患者的病历。采用多因素logistic回归分析评估术前临床和术后病理变量作为BCR的预测因素。我们还使用Kaplan-Meier法和竞争风险回归分析来评估BCR的累积发生率和风险。在排除接受新辅助或辅助治疗的患者后,本研究纳入了55例SVI患者。
这些患者中有31例(56.3%)发生了BCR。我们发现分级组和EPE阳性是SVI患者BCR的预测因素(分别为<0.001和=0.002)。使用多因素模型,EPE与SVI患者的BCR显著相关(风险比:5.402;95%置信区间,1.247 - 23.405;=0.012)。EPE阴性的患者BCR发生率显著较低(=0.002)。
在SVI肿瘤患者中,预后可能因是否存在EPE而有所不同。