• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 MRI 的分期与病理分期预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的比较。

Comparison of MRI-Based Staging and Pathologic Staging for Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.

机构信息

Molecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1182, Bldg 10, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Dec;221(6):773-787. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29609. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.23.29609
PMID:37404084
Abstract

Currently most clinical models for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) incorporate staging information from RP specimens, creating a gap in preoperative risk assessment. The purpose of our study was to compare the utility of presurgical staging information from MRI and postsurgical staging information from RP pathology in predicting BCR in patients with PCa. This retrospective study included 604 patients (median age, 60 years) with PCa who underwent prostate MRI before RP from June 2007 to December 2018. A single genitourinary radiologist assessed MRI examinations for extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) during clinical interpretations. The utility of EPE and SVI on MRI and RP pathology for BCR prediction was assessed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. Established clinical BCR prediction models, including the University of California San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (UCSF-CAPRA) model and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical (CAPRA-S) model, were evaluated in a subset of 374 patients with available Gleason grade groups from biopsy and RP pathology; two CAPRA-MRI models (CAPRA-S model with modifications to replace RP pathologic staging features with MRI staging features) were also assessed. Univariable predictors of BCR included EPE on MRI (HR = 3.6), SVI on MRI (HR = 4.4), EPE on RP pathology (HR = 5.0), and SVI on RP pathology (HR = 4.6) (all < .001). Three-year BCR-free survival (RFS) rates for patients without versus with EPE were 84% versus 59% for MRI and 89% versus 58% for RP pathology, and 3-year RFS rates for patients without versus with SVI were 82% versus 50% for MRI and 83% versus 54% for RP histology (all < .001). For patients with T3 disease on RP pathology, 3-year RFS rates were 67% and 41% for patients without and with T3 disease on MRI. AUCs of CAPRA models, including CAPRA-MRI models, ranged from 0.743 to 0.778. AUCs were not significantly different between CAPRA-S and CAPRA-MRI models ( > .05). RFS rates were significantly different between low- and intermediate-risk groups for only CAPRA-MRI models (80% vs 51% and 74% vs 44%; both < .001). Presurgical MRI-based staging features perform comparably to postsurgical pathologic staging features for predicting BCR. MRI staging can preoperatively identify patients at high BCR risk, helping to inform early clinical decision-making. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00026884 and NCT02594202.

摘要

目前,大多数用于预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发(BCR)的临床模型都纳入了 RP 标本的分期信息,这在术前风险评估中造成了差距。我们的研究目的是比较 MRI 术前分期信息和 RP 病理术后分期信息在预测前列腺癌患者 BCR 中的作用。这项回顾性研究纳入了 604 名(中位年龄 60 岁)于 2007 年 6 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受前列腺 MRI 检查的前列腺癌患者。一名泌尿生殖放射科医生在临床解读期间评估 MRI 检查的前列腺外扩展(EPE)和精囊侵犯(SVI)。通过 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 比例风险分析评估 MRI 和 RP 病理中的 EPE 和 SVI 在 BCR 预测中的作用。在 374 名具有活检和 RP 病理中可获得的格里森分级组的患者亚组中评估了既定的临床 BCR 预测模型,包括加利福尼亚大学旧金山前列腺癌风险评估(UCSF-CAPRA)模型和前列腺癌风险评估术后(CAPRA-S)模型;还评估了两种 CAPRA-MRI 模型(用修改后的 CAPRA-S 模型替换 RP 病理分期特征以替换 MRI 分期特征)。BCR 的单变量预测因素包括 MRI 上的 EPE(HR=3.6)、MRI 上的 SVI(HR=4.4)、RP 病理上的 EPE(HR=5.0)和 RP 病理上的 SVI(HR=4.6)(均<0.001)。无 EPE 患者与有 EPE 患者的 3 年 BCR 无复发生存率(RFS)分别为 84%和 59%(MRI)和 89%和 58%(RP 病理),无 SVI 患者与有 SVI 患者的 3 年 RFS 率分别为 82%和 50%(MRI)和 83%和 54%(RP 组织学)(均<0.001)。对于 RP 病理上有 T3 疾病的患者,无 T3 疾病和有 T3 疾病患者的 3 年 RFS 率分别为 67%和 41%。CAPRA 模型(包括 CAPRA-MRI 模型)的 AUC 范围为 0.743 至 0.778。CAPRA-S 和 CAPRA-MRI 模型之间的 AUC 没有显著差异(>0.05)。仅 CAPRA-MRI 模型的低危和中危组之间的 RFS 率有显著差异(80%比 51%和 74%比 44%;均<0.001)。术前 MRI 分期特征与术后病理分期特征在预测 BCR 方面具有可比性。MRI 分期可在术前识别出 BCR 风险高的患者,有助于指导早期临床决策。ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00026884 和 NCT02594202。

相似文献

1
Comparison of MRI-Based Staging and Pathologic Staging for Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.基于 MRI 的分期与病理分期预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Dec;221(6):773-787. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29609. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
Prostate magnetic resonance imaging to predict grade concordance, extra prostatic extension, and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.前列腺磁共振成像预测前列腺癌根治术后分级一致性、前列腺外侵犯及生化复发情况
Urol Oncol. 2025 Jul;43(7):445.e11-445.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.013. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.根治性前列腺切除术后具有局部不良病理特征的前列腺癌患者的管理:Gleason分级3 + 4 = 7病例进行主动监测的可行性
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;143(1):123-129. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2262-9. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
4
Risk stratification for early biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer in the era of multiparametric magnetic resonance imagining-targeted biopsy.多参数磁共振成像靶向活检时代前列腺癌早期生化复发的风险分层。
Prostate. 2023 May;83(6):572-579. doi: 10.1002/pros.24490. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
5
Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.Gleason评分对手术切缘阳性的pT3aN0/Nx前列腺癌患者生化复发的影响:来自前列腺癌研究委员会的一项多中心研究
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov;143(11):2393-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2502-7. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
6
Cell cycle progression score improves risk stratification in prostate cancer patients with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy.细胞周期进展评分可改善根治性前列腺切除术后病理不良的前列腺癌患者的风险分层。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar;146(3):687-694. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03089-6. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
7
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Is It Really Necessary? A Multicentric Longitudinal Study Assessing Oncological Outcomes in Patients With Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection vs Radical Prostatectomy Only.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术:真的有必要吗?一项多中心纵向研究,评估接受盆腔淋巴结清扫术与仅接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的肿瘤学结局。
J Urol. 2025 Apr 28:101097JU0000000000004587. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004587.
8
Prospective comparison of F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI with histopathology as the reference standard for intraprostatic tumour detection and T-staging of high-risk prostate cancer.以组织病理学为参考标准,对F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT和MRI在前列腺内肿瘤检测及高危前列腺癌T分期中的应用进行前瞻性比较。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07208-z.
9
Does the extent of extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy predict outcome?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺外延伸程度是否可预测预后?——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Histopathology. 2024 Nov;85(5):727-742. doi: 10.1111/his.15292. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
10
PSMA-PET-derived distance features as biomarkers for predicting outcomes in primary prostate cancer post-radical prostatectomy.基于前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描(PSMA-PET)得出的距离特征作为预测前列腺癌根治术后原发性前列腺癌预后的生物标志物。
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Jul 22;25(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00907-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary Analysis of PSA and BCR-Free Survival in Asian Prostate Cancer Patients.亚洲前列腺癌患者前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及无生化复发生存的二次分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2025 Jun 24;17:1205-1214. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S527092. eCollection 2025.
2
Preoperative MRI-based predictive model for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.基于术前磁共振成像的前列腺癌根治术后生化复发预测模型
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04877-0.
3
Deep learning-based image quality assessment: impact on detection accuracy of prostate cancer extraprostatic extension on MRI.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
2
Bridging the gap between prostate radiology and pathology through machine learning.通过机器学习弥合前列腺放射学与病理学之间的差距。
Med Phys. 2022 Aug;49(8):5160-5181. doi: 10.1002/mp.15777. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
3
Local Extent of Prostate Cancer at MRI versus Prostatectomy Histopathology: Associations with Long-term Oncologic Outcomes.MRI 与前列腺切除术组织病理学检查前列腺癌的局部范围:与长期肿瘤学结局的关系。
基于深度学习的图像质量评估:对 MRI 前列腺癌外扩检测准确性的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Aug;49(8):2891-2901. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04468-5. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Automated Detection and Grading of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at MRI via Cascaded Deep Learning and Random Forest Classification.基于级联深度学习和随机森林分类的 MRI 前列腺癌外扩的自动检测与分级。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Oct;31(10):4096-4106. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.04.011. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
5
T2-Weighted MRI Radiomic Features Predict Prostate Cancer Presence and Eventual Biochemical Recurrence.T2加权磁共振成像的影像组学特征可预测前列腺癌的存在及最终生化复发。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;15(18):4437. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184437.
Radiology. 2022 Mar;302(3):595-602. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210875. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
4
Prognostic Features of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy Based on Multiparametric MRI and Immunohistochemistry Analysis of MRI-guided Biopsy Specimens.基于多参数MRI及MRI引导下活检标本免疫组化分析的前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的预后特征
Radiology. 2021 Jun;299(3):613-623. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202425. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
5
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2020 版更新。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
Genetic Landscape of Prostate Cancer Conspicuity on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Bioinformatic Analysis.多参数磁共振成像中前列腺癌显见性的遗传图谱:一项系统综述和生物信息学分析
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020 Jul;20:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.06.006.
7
Imaging Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy: Where Are We Headed?前列腺切除术(根治性前列腺切除术)后影像学生化复发:我们的方向在哪里?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jun;214(6):1248-1258. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21905. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
8
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.切缘阳性长度和边缘处 Gleason 分级对局限期前列腺癌患者生化复发的影响。
Prostate. 2019 Dec;79(16):1832-1836. doi: 10.1002/pros.23908. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA Guideline Amendment 2018-2019.前列腺切除术术后辅助和挽救性放疗:ASTRO/AUA 指南 2018-2019 年修订版。
J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):533-538. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000295. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Molecular Hallmarks of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Visibility in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌中多参数磁共振成像可见性的分子特征。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Jan 24.