Kalinen Sofia, Kallio Heini, Kallonen Teemu, Knaapila Juha, Lamminen Tarja, Huovinen Pentti, Boström Peter, Hakanen Antti J, Gunell Marianne
Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Turku Clinical Microbiome Bank, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0197424. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01974-24. Epub 2025 May 22.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate how ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin, and nalidixic acid disks perform in screening fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms in 278 isolates collected from a prospective clinical material. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin, and nalidixic acid was performed with the disk diffusion method. PCR-based and sequencing methods were used to detect chromosomal mutations in the and genes and the presence of plasmid-mediated and genes. In addition, whole-genome sequencing was used to confirm these results. Our results show that fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms were discovered, even in ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolates, and plasmid-mediated low-level fluoroquinolone resistance is easily missed if only ciprofloxacin disk is used. strains with chromosomal and/or mutations were well detected with pefloxacin disk. However, nalidixic acid was a superior tool to detect and differentiate between low- (plasmid-mediated) and high-level (chromosomal mutations) fluoroquinolone resistance in . Thus, more clinical studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms in enteric bacteria and pathogens that show potential but are not yet phenotypically fluoroquinolone-resistant.
We show in our clinical setting that fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms are discovered, even among phenotypically fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates. When plasmid-mediated quinolone-resistance determinants are present, they are a potential risk for treatment failures due to accumulation of resistance mechanisms during the antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, when it is clinically relevant, fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms in should be monitored more closely, and we also recommend testing nalidixic acid susceptibility.
本研究的目的是评估环丙沙星、培氟沙星和萘啶酸药敏纸片在筛选从一份前瞻性临床材料中收集的278株分离菌的氟喹诺酮耐药机制方面的表现。采用纸片扩散法对环丙沙星、培氟沙星和萘啶酸进行药敏试验。使用基于PCR和测序的方法检测gyrA和parC基因中的染色体突变以及质粒介导的qnr和aac(6’)-Ib-cr基因的存在情况。此外,还使用全基因组测序来确认这些结果。我们的结果表明,即使在对环丙沙星敏感的分离菌中也发现了氟喹诺酮耐药机制,并且如果仅使用环丙沙星药敏纸片,质粒介导的低水平氟喹诺酮耐药很容易被漏检。培氟沙星药敏纸片能很好地检测出具有染色体gyrA和/或parC突变的菌株。然而,萘啶酸是检测和区分大肠埃希菌中低水平(质粒介导)和高水平(染色体突变)氟喹诺酮耐药的更优工具。因此,需要更多的临床研究来评估肠道细菌和具有潜在耐药性但尚未表现出表型氟喹诺酮耐药的病原体中氟喹诺酮耐药机制的临床相关性。
我们在临床环境中表明,即使在表型对氟喹诺酮敏感的大肠埃希菌分离菌中也发现了氟喹诺酮耐药机制。当存在质粒介导的喹诺酮耐药决定簇时,由于抗菌治疗期间耐药机制的积累,它们是治疗失败的潜在风险。因此,在临床相关时,应更密切地监测大肠埃希菌中的氟喹诺酮耐药机制,我们还建议检测萘啶酸敏感性。