Suppr超能文献

利用医疗补助和商业数据库的回顾性行政索赔数据对2015 - 2019年美国流感医疗保健差异进行的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of influenza healthcare disparities in the United States using retrospective administrative claims from Medicaid and commercial databases, 2015-2019.

作者信息

Matas Jennifer L, Raskina Kira, Tong Sabine, Forney Derrick, Scarpellini Bruno, Cruz-Rivera Mario, Puckrein Gary, Xu Liou

机构信息

Center for Clinical and Social Research, National Minority Quality Forum, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

Real Word Evidence, Opella Healthcare, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 22;20(5):e0321208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321208. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Influenza-related healthcare utilization among Medicaid patients and commercially insured patients is not well-understood. This study compared influenza-related healthcare utilization and assessed disease management among individuals diagnosed with influenza during the 2015-2019 influenza seasons.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified influenza cases among adults (18-64 years) using data from the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) Analytic Files (TAF) Research Identifiable Files (RIF) and Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM). Influenza-related healthcare utilization rates were calculated per 100,000 patients by setting (outpatient, emergency department (ED), inpatient hospitalizations, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions) and demographics (sex, race, and region). Rate ratios were computed to compare results from both databases. Influenza episode management assessment included the distribution of the index point-of-care, antiviral prescriptions, and laboratory tests obtained.

RESULTS

The Medicaid population had a higher representation of racial/ethnic minorities than the CDM population. In the Medicaid population, influenza-related visits in outpatient and ED settings were the most frequent forms of healthcare utilization, with similar rates of 652 and 637 visits per 100,000, respectively. In contrast, the CDM population predominantly utilized outpatient settings. Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics exhibited the highest rates of influenza-related ED visits in both cohorts. In the Medicaid population, Black (64.5%) and Hispanic (51.6%) patients predominantly used the ED as their index point-of-care for influenza. Overall, a greater proportion of Medicaid beneficiaries (49.8%) did not fill any influenza antiviral prescription compared to the CDM population (37.0%).

CONCLUSION

Addressing disparities in influenza-related healthcare utilization between Medicaid and CDM populations is crucial for equitable healthcare access. Targeted interventions are needed to improve primary care and antiviral access and reduce ED reliance, especially among racial/ethnic minorities and low-income populations.

摘要

背景

医疗补助患者和商业保险患者中与流感相关的医疗保健利用情况尚未得到充分了解。本研究比较了2015 - 2019年流感季节期间确诊为流感的个体中与流感相关的医疗保健利用情况,并评估了疾病管理情况。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用来自转型医疗补助统计信息系统(T-MSIS)分析文件(TAF)研究可识别文件(RIF)和Optum的去识别化临床信息学®数据集市数据库(CDM)的数据,确定了成年人(18 - 64岁)中的流感病例。按机构(门诊、急诊科(ED)、住院治疗和重症监护病房(ICU)入院)和人口统计学特征(性别、种族和地区)计算每10万名患者的与流感相关的医疗保健利用率。计算率比以比较两个数据库的结果。流感发作管理评估包括即时护理指数的分布、抗病毒处方和所进行的实验室检查。

结果

医疗补助人群中种族/族裔少数群体的比例高于CDM人群。在医疗补助人群中,门诊和急诊科的流感相关就诊是最常见的医疗保健利用形式,每10万人的就诊率分别为652次和637次,相似。相比之下,CDM人群主要利用门诊机构。非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔在两个队列中与流感相关的急诊科就诊率最高。在医疗补助人群中,黑人(64.5%)和西班牙裔(51.6%)患者主要将急诊科作为其流感的即时护理指数。总体而言,与CDM人群(37.0%)相比,更大比例的医疗补助受益人(49.8%)没有开具任何流感抗病毒处方。

结论

解决医疗补助人群和CDM人群在与流感相关的医疗保健利用方面的差异对于公平获得医疗保健至关重要。需要有针对性的干预措施来改善初级保健和抗病毒药物的可及性,并减少对急诊科的依赖,特别是在种族/族裔少数群体和低收入人群中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验