Suppr超能文献

用于橄榄叶蛋白质组学的蛋白质提取方案的比较分析:对差异蛋白质丰度和等电点分布的见解

Comparative Analysis of Protein Extraction Protocols for Olive Leaf Proteomics: Insights into Differential Protein Abundance and Isoelectric Point Distribution.

作者信息

Uçar Bihter, Öztuğ Merve, Tör Mahmut, Çelik-Öztürk Nurçin, Vardar Filiz, Cevher-Keskin Birsen

机构信息

Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK); Marmara Research Center, P.O. Box 21, Gebze 41470, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Department of General Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul 34722, Turkey.

出版信息

ACS Agric Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 13;5(5):739-749. doi: 10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00642. eCollection 2025 May 19.

Abstract

Plant proteomics studies face two major challenges: limited databases due to the need for sequenced genomes and the difficulty in obtaining high-quality protein extracts. Olive (), a key species in Mediterranean flora known for its rich biochemical content, presents additional complexity due to its lipidic structure and high levels of inhibitory compounds that hinder protein extraction. Consequently, various studies have focused on optimizing the protein extraction methods for olives. While different extraction protocols exist for leaf proteome analysis, their compatibility with LC-MS/MS has been scarcely studied. This work was carried out to compare three protein extraction protocols for LC-MS/MS analysis using olive ( L) leaf tissue. Denaturing SDS (Method A), physiological CHAPS (Method B), and phenolic TCA/acetone (Method C) were evaluated with LC-MS/MS data. The quantitative comparisons of the three extraction methods revealed that Protocol A gave the greatest yields. According to the results obtained, Protocol A uniquely identified 77 proteins, Protocol B identified 10 unique proteins, and Protocol C identified 19 unique proteins. Similarly, the peptide sequence analysis showed that Protocol A uniquely identified 208 peptide sequences, Protocol B identified 29, and Protocol C identified 36. Moreover, reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) results suggest that Method A may be more efficient in removing and retaining hydrophobic proteins. Overall, Protocol A demonstrated greater sensitivity, efficiency, and reproducibility in LC-MS/MS analysis.

摘要

植物蛋白质组学研究面临两大挑战

由于需要已测序的基因组,数据库有限,以及难以获得高质量的蛋白质提取物。橄榄()是地中海植物群中的关键物种,以其丰富的生化成分而闻名,由于其脂质结构和高水平的抑制性化合物阻碍蛋白质提取,使得情况更加复杂。因此,各种研究都集中在优化橄榄的蛋白质提取方法上。虽然存在不同的用于叶片蛋白质组分析的提取方案,但它们与液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)的兼容性却鲜有研究。这项工作旨在比较三种用于LC-MS/MS分析的蛋白质提取方案,使用橄榄(L)叶片组织。用LC-MS/MS数据评估了变性十二烷基硫酸钠(方法A)、生理性3-[(3-胆酰胺丙基)二甲基铵]-1-丙磺酸(CHAPS,方法B)和酚类三氯乙酸/丙酮(方法C)。三种提取方法的定量比较表明,方案A的产量最高。根据所得结果,方案A唯一鉴定出77种蛋白质,方案B鉴定出10种独特蛋白质,方案C鉴定出19种独特蛋白质。同样,肽序列分析表明,方案A唯一鉴定出208个肽序列,方案B鉴定出29个,方案C鉴定出36个。此外,反相高效液相色谱(RP-HPLC)结果表明,方法A在去除和保留疏水蛋白质方面可能更有效。总体而言,方案A在LC-MS/MS分析中表现出更高的灵敏度、效率和重现性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7580/12093291/331fd77b6c0f/as4c00642_0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验