Moreno-Torres José M, García-Roca Juan Alfonso, Abellan-Aynes Oriol, Diaz-Aroca Alvaro
Facultad de Deporte, UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Centro de Estudios Olimpiicos, Universidad Católica de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 May 6;10(2):162. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020162.
Strength training has gained recognition as an effective method to enhance physical fitness in children and adolescents. Its benefits include improvements in muscular strength, aerobic capacity (VOmax), and motor performance. However, the diversity in training protocols and participant characteristics across studies necessitates a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence. The aim of this paper was to analyse the influence of a strength training programme in young people aged 6 to 16 years on different aspects of physical fitness. A search was carried out in the EBSCO, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases. A total of 634 articles were reviewed, and 22 were finally included in the meta-analysis of articles published between 2013 and 2023 in English or Spanish. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed using the AXIS and PEDro tools. Standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The variables that were most frequently repeated as criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of strength training were the following: (1) strength of the lower/upper body muscles; (2) VOmax; (3) sprint performance. Strength training interventions produced statistically significant improvements in all analysed variables. Most effective programmes lasted between 6 and 12 weeks, with 2-3 sessions per week. VOmax showed the greatest improvement, followed by upper and lower limb strength, and sprint performance. Heterogeneity ranged from low to moderate. Supervised strength training programmes can significantly enhance physical fitness in school-aged children and adolescents. While the included studies varied in design and duration, measurable improvements were commonly observed in interventions lasting at least 6-8 weeks. Future research should explore age- and maturity-related responses through subgroup analyses. Limitations include the exclusion of studies published after 2023 and the wide age range of participants without biological stratification.
力量训练已被公认为是增强儿童和青少年身体素质的有效方法。其益处包括肌肉力量、有氧能力(最大摄氧量)和运动表现的改善。然而,各项研究中训练方案和参与者特征的多样性使得有必要对证据进行全面综合。本文的目的是分析一项针对6至16岁青少年的力量训练计划对身体素质不同方面的影响。我们在EBSCO、科学网和Scopus数据库中进行了检索。共审查了634篇文章,最终有22篇被纳入对2013年至2023年间以英文或西班牙文发表的文章的荟萃分析。22项研究符合纳入标准,并使用AXIS和PEDro工具进行评估。计算了标准化均数差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。作为评估力量训练效果标准最常重复出现的变量如下:(1)下肢/上肢肌肉力量;(2)最大摄氧量;(3)短跑成绩。力量训练干预在所有分析变量上均产生了具有统计学意义的改善。最有效的训练计划持续6至12周,每周进行2至3次训练。最大摄氧量的改善最为显著,其次是上肢和下肢力量以及短跑成绩。异质性从低到中等。有监督的力量训练计划可显著提高学龄儿童和青少年的身体素质。虽然纳入的研究在设计和持续时间上各不相同,但在持续至少6至8周的干预中通常观察到了可测量的改善。未来的研究应通过亚组分析探索与年龄和成熟度相关的反应。局限性包括排除了2023年以后发表的研究以及参与者年龄范围广且未进行生物学分层。