Califano Maria, Pruccoli Jacopo, Cavallino Oliviero, Lenzi Alessandra, Parmeggiani Antonia
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Centro Regionale per i Disturbi della Nutrizione e dell'Alimentazione in Età Evolutiva, U.O.C. Neuropsichiatria dell'Età Pediatrica, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Pediatr Rep. 2025 May 19;17(3):61. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17030061.
Feeding and eating disorders (FED) represent a major public health issue and are the second leading cause of death among psychiatric conditions in children and adolescents. Psychopathological comorbidities play a significant role in the onset and persistence of FED, yet research on their underlying structure remains limited. This study explores the psychiatric comorbidities associated with FED, focusing on common etiopathogenetic factors and their clinical implications.
Data were retrospectively collected from the Italian Regional Center for FED in the Emilia-Romagna Region between June 2023 and April 2024. Diagnoses were assigned following DSM-5 criteria using the Italian version of the semi-structured K-SADS-PL diagnostic interview. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to identify latent psychological dimensions underlying FED psychopathology, retaining five components based on the scree plot. Additionally, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to examine differences in factor scores across FED subtypes, while adjusting for potential confounders.
Seventy-two participants were included (mean age: 14.6 years; mean BMI: 18.3 kg/m; male-to-female ratio: 1:8). Diagnoses were distributed as follows: 63.9% anorexia nervosa (AN), 13.9% other specified feeding and eating disorder (OSFED), 6.9% avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), 4.2% binge eating disorder (BED), 4.2% unspecified feeding and eating disorder (UFED), and 2.7% bulimia nervosa (BN). All participants met the criteria for at least one psychiatric comorbidity. Identified psychopathological clusters include the following: (1) mood disorders (66.5%); (2) anxiety disorders (87.5%); (3) obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (47.2%); (4) neurodevelopmental disorders, i.e., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (30.5%); (5) disruptive and impulse-control disorders (13.9%); and (6) psychotic symptoms (40.3%). No instances of tic or elimination disorders were detected. Conduct disorder was more prevalent among UFED, BED, and BN patients compared to other FED ( = 0.005), and moderate/severe ADHD was associated with higher body mass index (BMI) ( = 0.035). PCA revealed distinct psychological dimensions underlying FED, while ANCOVA indicated significant differences in factor scores across FED subtypes, supporting the presence of shared transdiagnostic mechanisms.
This study highlights the complex interplay between FED and psychiatric comorbidities, emphasizing the need for early intervention and personalized treatment approaches. The dimensional structure identified through PCA suggests that common psychopathological factors may drive FED development, and ANCOVA findings support their differential expression across FED types. Future research should further investigate these transdiagnostic mechanisms to optimize clinical care.
进食与饮食障碍(FED)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,是儿童和青少年精神疾病中第二大死因。精神病理共病在FED的发病和持续存在中起重要作用,但其潜在结构的研究仍然有限。本研究探讨与FED相关的精神共病,重点关注常见的病因学因素及其临床意义。
回顾性收集2023年6月至2024年4月期间意大利艾米利亚 - 罗马涅地区FED区域中心的数据。使用意大利语版半结构化的K-SADS-PL诊断访谈,按照《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)标准进行诊断。进行主成分分析(PCA)以确定FED精神病理学背后的潜在心理维度,根据碎石图保留五个成分。此外,进行协方差分析(ANCOVA)以检查FED各亚型之间的因子得分差异,同时调整潜在的混杂因素。
纳入72名参与者(平均年龄:14.6岁;平均体重指数:18.3kg/m;男女比例:1:8)。诊断分布如下:神经性厌食症(AN)63.9%,其他特定的进食与饮食障碍(OSFED)13.9%,回避性限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)6.9%,暴食症(BED)4.2%,未特定的进食与饮食障碍(UFED)4.2%,神经性贪食症(BN)2.7%。所有参与者均符合至少一种精神共病的标准。确定的精神病理集群包括:(1)情绪障碍(66.5%);(2)焦虑障碍(87.5%);(3)强迫症及相关障碍(47.2%);(4)神经发育障碍,即注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)(30.5%);(5)破坏性行为和冲动控制障碍(13.9%);(6)精神病性症状(40.3%)。未检测到抽动或排泄障碍的病例。与其他FED相比,品行障碍在UFED、BED和BN患者中更普遍(P = 0.005),中度/重度ADHD与较高的体重指数(BMI)相关(P = 0.035)。PCA揭示了FED背后不同的心理维度,而ANCOVA表明FED各亚型之间的因子得分存在显著差异,支持存在共同的跨诊断机制。
本研究强调了FED与精神共病之间的复杂相互作用,强调了早期干预和个性化治疗方法的必要性。通过PCA确定的维度结构表明,常见的精神病理因素可能驱动FED的发展,ANCOVA的结果支持它们在不同FED类型中的差异表达。未来的研究应进一步调查这些跨诊断机制,以优化临床护理。