Zhuang Bo, Zhou Yu, Yu Shian, Zhang Yaoqi, Li Gang
Department of General Surgery, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, No. 351, Mingyue Street, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China.
Department of General Surgery, Sichuan Forestry Central Hospital, No. 10, Baimashi Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):176. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03370-3.
Totally visceral sac separation (TVS) is a novel concept proposed for hernia repair, preserving the integrity of the posterior rectus sheath (PRS). The aim of this study was to compare the results of TVS with the extended view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) method for umbilical and epigastric hernias.
A retrospective comparison analysis was conducted including 45 e-TEP and 43 TVS procedures performed between June 2021 and June 2024. Baseline characteristics, surgical records, and postoperative information were collected and analyzed for both groups from the electronic medical records system.
The baseline characteristics showed no significant differences. The TVS group had a significantly longer mean operative time (230 (36) minutes vs. 190 (84) minutes, P<0.01) and used a smaller mesh area (120 (10) cm² vs. 130 (20) cm², P<0.01). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of quality of life scores, postoperative length of stay, and medical expenses. One patient in the e-TEP group experienced surgical site and mesh infection, requiring mesh removal and resulting in hernia recurrence.
Despite its complexity and longer operative time, the TVS approach offers potential advantages in long-term outcomes and complication management for umbilical and epigastric hernias. These findings contribute to the understanding and potential adoption of the TVS technique in hernia repair.
全内脏囊分离术(TVS)是一种为疝修补术提出的新概念,可保留腹直肌后鞘(PRS)的完整性。本研究的目的是比较TVS与扩展视野完全腹膜外(e-TEP)方法治疗脐疝和上腹部疝的效果。
进行回顾性比较分析,纳入2021年6月至2024年6月期间实施的45例e-TEP手术和43例TVS手术。从电子病历系统收集并分析两组的基线特征、手术记录和术后信息。
基线特征无显著差异。TVS组的平均手术时间明显更长(230(36)分钟对190(84)分钟,P<0.01),使用的补片面积更小(120(10)cm²对130(20)cm²,P<0.01)。两组在生活质量评分、术后住院时间和医疗费用方面未观察到显著差异。e-TEP组有1例患者发生手术部位和补片感染,需要取出补片,导致疝复发。
尽管TVS方法复杂且手术时间较长,但在脐疝和上腹部疝的长期疗效和并发症管理方面具有潜在优势。这些发现有助于理解并可能采用TVS技术进行疝修补。