Kinet Sam, Maes Hendrik, Van Cleven Stijn, Brusselaers Nele, Kuppens Eddy F P
Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
AZ Alma (General Hospital), Ringlaan 15, 9900, Eeklo, Belgium.
Updates Surg. 2024 Dec;76(8):2923-2931. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01905-4. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
The Rives-Stoppa (RS) procedure is a gold standard treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias. Comparability of pain control and outcomes to the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal prosthetic (eTEP) repair remain unclear. A single-centre retrospective surgical cohort was selected including 30 RS repairs (January 2019-November 2021) and 30 consecutive eTEP procedures (September 2021-August 2022) for midline abdominal wall hernia(s) with rectus abdominis diastasis. Postoperative pain and outcomes were compared up to 1 month. Presence and median duration of patient-controlled analgesia were, respectively, 90% and 3 nights with RS, versus 30% and 0 nights with eTEP. Median switch to only oral analgesics occurred at postoperative day (POD) 3 after RS and at POD 2 after eTEP. Postoperative analgesics and opioid prescription at discharge were comparable. Median length of hospital stay was six nights after RS versus 3 nights after eTEP. Median duration of surgery was 110.5 and 164.5 min for RS and eTEP, respectively. After RS, 30 patients had postoperative drain(s) compared to 3 patients after eTEP. Conversion was needed in 3 eTEP procedures. Postoperative complications were comparable. No early recurrences were observed. Minimal residual diastasis was seen at postoperative consultation in 11 patients after eTEP. Compared to RS, eTEP is a minimally invasive alternative treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias with rectus abdominis diastasis and is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain and a comparable risk of short-term complications. At 1 month after eTEP, minimal residual diastasis can be present. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05446675. Secondary identifying number: EC/EH/220608-SK. Date of Registration: June 24, 2022.
里夫斯-斯托帕(RS)手术是治疗中线腹壁疝的金标准。与强化视野完全腹膜外假体(eTEP)修复相比,疼痛控制和治疗效果的可比性尚不清楚。选取了一个单中心回顾性手术队列,包括30例RS修复手术(2019年1月至2021年11月)和30例连续的eTEP手术(2021年9月至2022年8月),用于治疗伴有腹直肌分离的中线腹壁疝。比较了术后1个月内的疼痛情况和治疗效果。患者自控镇痛的使用情况和中位持续时间方面,RS组分别为90%和3个晚上,而eTEP组为30%和0个晚上。RS组在术后第3天、eTEP组在术后第2天,中位时间转为仅使用口服镇痛药。出院时的术后镇痛药和阿片类药物处方相当。RS组的中位住院时间为6个晚上,eTEP组为3个晚上。RS组和eTEP组的中位手术时间分别为110.5分钟和164.5分钟。RS组术后有30例放置了引流管,eTEP组为3例。3例eTEP手术需要中转。术后并发症相当。未观察到早期复发。eTEP术后门诊复查时,11例患者存在最小残余腹直肌分离。与RS相比,eTEP是治疗伴有腹直肌分离的中线腹壁疝的一种微创替代治疗方法,且住院时间更短、术后疼痛更少,短期并发症风险相当。eTEP术后1个月时可能存在最小残余腹直肌分离。临床试验.gov:NCT05446675。二级识别编号:EC/EH/220608-SK。注册日期:2022年6月24日。