Ribeiro Filipe Virgilio, Sousa Marcelo Porto, Ferreira Marcio Yuri, Andreão Filipi Fim, Palavani Lucca B, Fabrini Paleare Luis F, Simoni Gabriel, Corrêa Eduardo, Fukunaga Christian Ken, Mitre Lucas Pari, Jucá Rafaela Hamada, Arend Rudolfh Batista, Peroni Bruno Zilli, Roman Alex, Bertani Raphael, Brito Herika Negri, Polverini Allan Dias
Barão de Mauá Faculty of Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jul;137:111330. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111330. Epub 2025 May 22.
Stereotactic radiosurgery effectively controls vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, in certain cases, microsurgical resection may be necessary for tumor progression after radiosurgery or, after failure of the latter. The results on the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery for VS are still unclear, with scarce literature on the subject.
The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery on the resection of vestibular schwannomas that have been previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy.
Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We used single proportion analysis with 95 % confidence intervals under a random-effects model, I to assess heterogeneity, and Baujat and sensitivity analysis to address high heterogeneity. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients treated with salvage surgery to resection of vestibular schwannomas after failure of stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy.
Of the 1841 initially identified studies, 18 were selected, involving 455 patients, with a median follow-up of 33 months. The combined analysis showed a 69 % (CI: 58 % - 79 %) rate of good clinical outcomes. Regarding partial resection, the pooled analysis confirmed a 48 % rate (CI: 33 % to 63 %) and a 52 % complete resection rate (CI: 37 % to 67 %). The pooled analysis confirmed a 95 % hearing preservation rate in patients undergoing the retrosigmoid approach (CI: 90 % to 100 %) and a 78 % facial nerve preservation rate (CI: 72 % to 84 %). Regarding complications, the pooled analysis confirmed a 20 % complication rate (CI: 14 % to 28 %). There were no deaths related to the procedure.
Based on the results, our meta-analysis identified that rescue surgery has been shown to be safe and effective for resection of vestibular schwannomas after failure of stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy, based on good facial nerve preservation rate and total lesion resection rate.
立体定向放射外科手术能有效控制前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)。然而,在某些情况下,对于放射外科手术后肿瘤进展或放射外科手术失败的病例,可能需要进行显微手术切除。关于VS挽救性手术的安全性和有效性的结果仍不明确,相关文献稀少。
本研究旨在评估对先前接受立体定向放射外科手术或放射治疗的前庭神经鞘瘤进行挽救性手术的安全性和有效性。
按照PRISMA指南,我们检索了Medline、Embase和科学网数据库。我们采用随机效应模型下的单比例分析及95%置信区间,用I2评估异质性,并用Baujat法和敏感性分析处理高异质性。符合条件的研究包括那些有≥4例患者在立体定向放射外科手术或放射治疗失败后接受挽救性手术切除前庭神经鞘瘤的研究。
在最初识别的1841项研究中,筛选出18项,涉及455例患者,中位随访时间为33个月。综合分析显示良好临床结局的发生率为69%(置信区间:58% - 79%)。关于部分切除,汇总分析证实部分切除率为48%(置信区间:33%至63%),完全切除率为52%(置信区间:37%至67%)。汇总分析证实乙状窦后入路患者的听力保留率为95%(置信区间:90%至100%),面神经保留率为78%(置信区间:72%至84%)。关于并发症,汇总分析证实并发症发生率为20%(置信区间:14%至28%)。没有与手术相关的死亡病例。
基于这些结果,我们的荟萃分析表明,基于良好的面神经保留率和全病变切除率,挽救性手术已被证明对立体定向放射外科手术或放射治疗失败后的前庭神经鞘瘤切除是安全有效的。