Saunders J C, Dear S P, Schneider M E
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Sep;78(3):833-60. doi: 10.1121/1.392915.
The anatomic consequences of acoustic overstimulation are explored in this presentation, and attention is directed toward issues where improvements in technology and empirical observation are needed before further advances in our understanding can be achieved. Gains have been made in the last decade in appreciating sound-induced cochlear injury, but there is now a need to evaluate not only cochlear pathology but also the functional state of the surviving structures. There is a wealth of information about the susceptibility of inner or outer hair cells to acoustic injury; however, the etiology of this injury is not yet fully understood. In addition, current ideas concerning the effects of noise on hair-cell stereocilia, hair-cell synapses, the cochlear vascular supply, and the central auditory pathways are in a state of flux and are either undergoing revision or emerging. Other issues, such as the basis of temporary or permanent threshold shift at the cellular level, and the individual differences in susceptibility to injury are in need of a fresh approach. It would seem that the time is now ripe to review our knowledge, recognize its gaps, and develop testable hypotheses concerning the mechanisms of acoustic injury to the ear.
本报告探讨了声学过度刺激的解剖学后果,并将注意力转向在我们能够取得进一步进展之前,技术和实证观察需要改进的问题。在过去十年里,我们对声音引起的耳蜗损伤有了更多认识,但现在不仅需要评估耳蜗病理学,还需要评估存活结构的功能状态。关于内毛细胞或外毛细胞对声学损伤的易感性,有大量信息;然而,这种损伤的病因尚未完全了解。此外,目前关于噪声对毛细胞静纤毛、毛细胞突触、耳蜗血管供应和中枢听觉通路影响的观点尚不稳定,正在修订或刚刚出现。其他问题,如细胞水平上暂时或永久阈移的基础,以及个体对损伤易感性的差异,都需要新的研究方法。现在似乎是时候回顾我们的知识,认识到其中的差距,并就耳部声学损伤的机制提出可检验的假设了。