Ismail Anas, Mathauer Inke, Akweongo Patricia, Bolivar Vargas Mery Concepcion, Desai Sapna, Raharja Dinna Prapto, Ogundimu Modupe Adeoti, Stojisavljevic Stela, De Allegri Manuela, Shroff Zubin Cyrus
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Health Financing and Economics, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 22;7(Suppl 6):e018176. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018176.
Many low-income and middle-income countries have introduced public health insurance systems, whereby, thanks to government subsidies, selected groups are entitled to receive insurance coverage even if not paying direct contributions into the system. These efforts towards achieving universal health coverage were often undermined by difficulties in enrolment and registration, barriers to health service utilisation or complicated rules around service packages. Governmental and non-governmental accountability initiatives have been established to overcome these barriers in order to make health insurance programmes responsive and to empower citizens. This paper examines evidence and synthesizes lessons from 20 accountability initiatives in six selected countries to understand how these achieved (or not) these goals.
We systematically analysed six final reports and five published papers which were part of a multicountry research programme from 2019 to end of 2022 studying accountability initiatives. Between June 2023 and September 2024, we systematically extracted data and synthesised findings from the reports and papers based on a conceptual framework, adapted from a framework developed by Molyneux, which had been adopted by the country teams to guide their studies. We coded the extracted data and identified the content, context and process factors that enabled or hindered the accountability initiatives in achieving their intended goals. We present and discuss factors that were present in at least two initiatives.
Governmental initiatives were in most instances established in conjunction with the health reforms that introduced the health insurance programmes they address. Whereas some of these initiatives were effective, many were undermined by poor outreach to citizens, inadequacy of resources, conflicts of interest and power imbalances and lack of fidelity to original design. Non-governmental initiatives often emerged to fill existing gaps in government services and programmes. Many of the non-governmental initiatives had several features which helped them in contributing to citizen empowerment, and these included embeddedness in and being trusted by the local communities, flexibility in operating and reaching out to people and the underlying motivation of people working in them.
The effective implementation of accountability initiatives requires transparency, trust-building measures, active outreach and community engagement and adequate resources. These elements can ensure that initiatives achieve their intended goal of enhancing citizens' access to their health insurance entitlements. Further research is needed to understand how best collaboration between governmental and non-governmental initiatives can be fostered to build synergies between the two toward the achievement of common goals.
许多低收入和中等收入国家已引入公共医疗保险制度,借助政府补贴,特定群体即使未直接缴纳保险费也有权获得保险覆盖。这些实现全民健康覆盖的努力常常因登记注册困难、医疗服务利用障碍或服务包相关规则复杂而受到阻碍。为克服这些障碍,已建立政府和非政府问责举措,以使医疗保险计划更具响应性并赋予公民权力。本文研究了六个选定国家20项问责举措的证据并总结经验教训,以了解这些举措如何(或未)实现这些目标。
我们系统分析了六份最终报告和五篇已发表论文,这些是2019年至2022年底一项多国研究计划的一部分,该计划研究问责举措。在2023年6月至2024年9月期间,我们基于一个概念框架系统地从报告和论文中提取数据并综合研究结果,该框架改编自莫利纽克斯开发的一个框架,各国团队已采用该框架来指导他们的研究。我们对提取的数据进行编码,确定促成或阻碍问责举措实现其预期目标的内容、背景和过程因素。我们展示并讨论至少两项举措中存在的因素。
政府举措大多是与引入它们所涉及的医疗保险计划的卫生改革一起建立的。虽然其中一些举措是有效的,但许多举措因对公民的宣传不足、资源不足、利益冲突和权力失衡以及对原始设计缺乏忠诚度而受到损害。非政府举措往往是为填补政府服务和计划中的现有空白而出现的。许多非政府举措有几个有助于它们促进公民赋权的特征,这些特征包括融入当地社区并得到当地社区的信任、运营和接触民众的灵活性以及其中工作人员的内在动力。
问责举措的有效实施需要透明度、建立信任的措施、积极的宣传和社区参与以及充足的资源。这些要素可以确保举措实现其增强公民获得医疗保险权益的预期目标。需要进一步研究以了解如何最好地促进政府和非政府举措之间的合作,以在两者之间建立协同效应以实现共同目标。