• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨脓毒症风险中的社会经济差异以及可改变因素的中介作用:一项孟德尔随机化研究。

Examining socioeconomic differences in sepsis risk and mediation by modifiable factors: a Mendelian randomization study.

作者信息

Stensrud Vilde Hatlevoll, Rogne Tormod, Flatby Helene Marie, Mohus Randi Marie, Gustad Lise Tuset, Nilsen Tom Ivar Lund

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Mid-Norway Centre for Sepsis Research, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 23;25(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11130-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-025-11130-y
PMID:40410669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12103053/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Educational attainment is inversely related to sepsis risk, but the causal nature is still unclear. We therefore conducted the first Mendelian randomization (MR) study of genetically predicted educational attainment on sepsis that also uses a within-family genetic instrument for education. To further explore possible mechanistic pathways that can inform strategies to reduce sepsis risk, we examined the mediating effects of factors that are modifiable or can be prevented.

METHODS

The association between genetically predicted educational attainment and sepsis was estimated using summary-level data from recent genome-wide association studies. Possible bias due to population stratification, dynastic effects, and assortative mating in the genetic instrument for education was evaluated using summary-level data from a within-sibship genome-wide association study. We used inverse variance weighted MR analysis to estimate the effect of one standard deviation increase in years of education on sepsis risk. The robustness of the findings was assessed in sensitivity analyses, applying weighted median, weighted mode, and MR Egger regression. Finally, we applied multivariable MR analyses to estimate the mediating effects of smoking initiation, alcohol consumption, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

For each standard deviation increase in genetically predicted educational attainment (3.4 years), the odds ratio (OR) for sepsis was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.78). The results of the analysis using the within-sibship genetic instrument and other sensitivity analyses were in line with this finding: within-sibship OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.18), weighted median OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.80), weighted mode OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.13), and MR Egger OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.85). The mediation analysis showed that 56% of the effect of educational attainment on sepsis risk can be explained by modifiable or preventable factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher educational attainment is strongly associated with a reduced risk of sepsis, pointing to important socioeconomic differences in this disease. The results also suggest that interventions targeting modifiable or preventable factors could contribute to reducing the socioeconomic differences in sepsis risk.

摘要

背景

受教育程度与脓毒症风险呈负相关,但其因果性质仍不明确。因此,我们开展了第一项关于基因预测的受教育程度对脓毒症影响的孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,该研究还使用了家庭内部的基因工具来衡量教育程度。为了进一步探索可能的机制途径,以便为降低脓毒症风险的策略提供依据,我们研究了可改变或可预防因素的中介作用。

方法

利用近期全基因组关联研究的汇总数据,估计基因预测的受教育程度与脓毒症之间的关联。使用同胞基因组范围内关联研究的汇总数据,评估教育基因工具中由于人群分层、王朝效应和选型交配可能导致的偏差。我们使用逆方差加权MR分析来估计教育年限增加一个标准差对脓毒症风险的影响。在敏感性分析中,应用加权中位数、加权众数和MR Egger回归评估研究结果的稳健性。最后,我们应用多变量MR分析来估计吸烟起始、饮酒、体重指数、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇、收缩压和2型糖尿病的中介作用。

结果

基因预测的受教育程度每增加一个标准差(3.4年),脓毒症的比值比(OR)为0.72(95%置信区间(CI)0.66至0.78)。使用同胞基因工具的分析结果和其他敏感性分析结果与此发现一致:同胞内OR为0.88(95%CI 0.64至1.18),加权中位数OR为0.70(95%CI 0.62至0.80),加权众数OR为0.70(95%CI从0.43至1.13),MR Egger OR为0.65(95%CI 0.50至0.85)。中介分析表明,受教育程度对脓毒症风险的影响中有56%可由可改变或可预防的因素解释。

结论

受教育程度较高与脓毒症风险降低密切相关,表明该疾病存在重要的社会经济差异。研究结果还表明,针对可改变或可预防因素的干预措施可能有助于减少脓毒症风险方面的社会经济差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fc/12103053/06740c94bf16/12879_2025_11130_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fc/12103053/c85a37fd4550/12879_2025_11130_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fc/12103053/9152c762f086/12879_2025_11130_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fc/12103053/06740c94bf16/12879_2025_11130_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fc/12103053/c85a37fd4550/12879_2025_11130_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fc/12103053/9152c762f086/12879_2025_11130_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fc/12103053/06740c94bf16/12879_2025_11130_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining socioeconomic differences in sepsis risk and mediation by modifiable factors: a Mendelian randomization study.探讨脓毒症风险中的社会经济差异以及可改变因素的中介作用:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 23;25(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11130-y.
2
Mediating Factors in the Association of Maternal Educational Level With Pregnancy Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Study.母亲受教育程度与妊娠结局关联的中介因素:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2351166. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51166.
3
Educational attainment, health outcomes and mortality: a within-sibship Mendelian randomization study.教育程度、健康结果和死亡率:同卵双生子孟德尔随机化研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Oct 5;52(5):1579-1591. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad079.
4
[Educational attainment increases the risk of developing allergic rhinitis and (or) eczema: a Mendelian randomization study based on genome-wide association studies in European patients].[教育程度增加患过敏性鼻炎和(或)湿疹的风险:一项基于欧洲患者全基因组关联研究的孟德尔随机化研究]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 6;58(6):791-798. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20230830-00138.
5
Lifestyle factors, metabolic factors and socioeconomic status for pelvic organ prolapse: a Mendelian randomization study.生活方式因素、代谢因素和社会经济地位与盆腔器官脱垂的关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jun 7;28(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01148-w.
6
Genetic causality between modifiable risk factors and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: Evidence from Mendelian randomization.可改变的风险因素与类风湿性关节炎风险之间的遗传因果关系:来自孟德尔随机化的证据。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep;27(9):e15315. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.15315.
7
Educational attainment protects against type 2 diabetes independently of cognitive performance: a Mendelian randomization study.受教育程度可独立于认知表现预防 2 型糖尿病:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 May;58(5):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01647-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Smoking and asthma mediate the protective effect of educational attainment on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk: a mediation Mendelian randomization analysis.吸烟和哮喘介导了受教育程度对慢性阻塞性肺疾病风险的保护作用:一项中介孟德尔随机化分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03658-1.
9
Association of educational attainment with esophageal cancer, Barrett's esophagus, and gastroesophageal reflux disease, and the mediating role of modifiable risk factors: A Mendelian randomization study.教育程度与食管癌、巴雷特食管和胃食管反流病的关联,以及可改变的风险因素的中介作用:一项孟德尔随机研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 28;11:1022367. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1022367. eCollection 2023.
10
Modifiable risk factors mediating the impact of educational inequality on heart failure: A Mendelian randomization study.可调节风险因素在教育不平等对心力衰竭影响中的中介作用:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Prev Med. 2024 Sep;186:108098. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108098. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Design and quality control of large-scale two-sample Mendelian randomization studies.大规模两样本孟德尔随机化研究的设计与质量控制。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 12;52(5):1498-1521. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad018. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Rapid systematic review on risks and outcomes of sepsis: the influence of risk factors associated with health inequalities.关于脓毒症风险和结局的快速系统评价:与健康不平等相关的危险因素的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 21;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02114-6.
3
Associations of educational attainment with Sepsis mediated by metabolism traits and smoking: a Mendelian randomization study.
受代谢特征和吸烟影响的教育程度与脓毒症的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;12:1330606. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1330606. eCollection 2024.
4
Mediating Factors in the Association of Maternal Educational Level With Pregnancy Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Study.母亲受教育程度与妊娠结局关联的中介因素:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2351166. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51166.
5
Mendelian randomization.孟德尔随机化
Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2022 Feb 10;2. doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5.
6
Bias correction for inverse variance weighting Mendelian randomization.基于逆方差加权的孟德尔随机化偏倚校正。
Genet Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;47(4):314-331. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22522. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
7
Direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic status on sepsis risk and mortality: a mediation analysis of the HUNT Study.社会经济地位对脓毒症风险和死亡率的直接和间接影响:亨特研究的中介分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Mar;77(3):168-174. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219825. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
8
Genetic diversity fuels gene discovery for tobacco and alcohol use.遗传多样性为烟草和酒精使用的基因发现提供了动力。
Nature. 2022 Dec;612(7941):720-724. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05477-4. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
9
Norwegian policies to reduce social inequalities in health: Developments from 1987 to 2021.挪威减少健康不平等的政策:1987 年至 2021 年的发展。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Nov;50(7):882-886. doi: 10.1177/14034948221129685.
10
Is the Product Method More Efficient Than the Difference Method for Assessing Mediation?产品法比差异法更有效评估中介效应吗?
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 6;192(1):84-92. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac144.