Suppr超能文献

首发精神病患者中强制手段的使用:一项关于非自愿住院、非自愿治疗令和社区治疗令的回顾性队列研究

Use of coercion in patients with first-episode psychosis: a retrospective cohort study of involuntary admissions, involuntary treatment orders and community treatment orders.

作者信息

Schou Morten Brix, Walla Berit, Seljeflot Bjørn Siver

机构信息

Department of Psychosis and Rehabilitation, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

BUP Mosjøen, Helgelandssykehuset, Norway.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;79(5):354-363. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2025.2508416. Epub 2025 May 24.

Abstract

AIM

Coercion in mental health care is under constant debate. Norway has been shown to have relatively high rates of involuntary admissions. The use of coercion in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) in Norway is sparsely described, thus limiting an informative debate.

METHOD

We registered involuntary admissions, involuntary treatment orders, community treatment orders and other coercive measures during the first two years of treatment for all patients diagnosed with a first-episode non-affective psychosis at St Olav's University Hospital from 2012 to 2016. The hospital serves the Sør-Trøndelag County with 313,370 inhabitants in 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients with FEP were included. 40% of the patients were involuntary admitted at first contact leading to the psychosis diagnose, and during the first two years of treatment 53% of the patients were involuntary admitted. Of the involuntarily admitted patients, 43% were discharged on a community treatment order, and 34% had involuntary treatment orders. Other coercive measures, such as short-term holding, mechanical restraint or short-acting medication, were used in 21% of patients receiving inpatient treatment.

CONCLUSION

Involuntary admission was relatively common in this cohort of FEP patients, although less used than in previous studies from Norway. Compared to studies from other countries, our findings, along with those from Finland, show among the highest rates of involuntary admissions and involuntary treatment orders published, and are higher than findings in other Nordic countries such as Denmark and Sweden.

摘要

目的

精神卫生保健中的强制手段一直是争论的焦点。挪威的非自愿住院率相对较高。挪威首发精神病(FEP)患者中强制手段的使用情况鲜有描述,这限制了有价值的讨论。

方法

我们记录了2012年至2016年在圣奥拉夫大学医院被诊断为首发非情感性精神病的所有患者治疗的前两年中的非自愿住院、非自愿治疗令、社区治疗令及其他强制手段。该医院服务于南特伦德拉格郡,2016年该郡有313,370名居民。

结果

共纳入238例FEP患者。40%的患者在首次因精神病诊断而就诊时被非自愿收治,在治疗的前两年中,53%的患者被非自愿收治。在非自愿收治的患者中,43%在社区治疗令下出院,34%有非自愿治疗令。21%接受住院治疗的患者使用了其他强制手段,如短期拘留、机械约束或短效药物。

结论

在这组FEP患者中,非自愿收治相对常见,尽管比挪威以前的研究使用得少。与其他国家的研究相比,我们的研究结果与芬兰的研究结果一起,显示出已发表的非自愿住院率和非自愿治疗令率是最高的,且高于丹麦和瑞典等其他北欧国家的研究结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验