Wong Beverly Wen Xin, Smagula Stephen F, Shen Liang, Chan Yiong Huak, Cauley Jane A, Yong Eu-Leong
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 12, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 24;15(1):18069. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02805-2.
There is a lack of studies examining the role of women-specific factors in the development of depression in midlife women. Healthy women (45-69 years) were enrolled at baseline from a Singapore tertiary hospital and followed up 6.8 years later. Risk factors were ascertained using validated questionnaires, and physical performance was objectively measured. Changes in risk factors were calculated by subtracting baseline from follow-up values. Depressive symptoms were defined using a Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale score ≥ 16 and/or use of anti-depression medication. Incident cases were new cases that emerged during follow-up. Modified Poisson regression analyses examined associations between risk factors and outcomes. After 6.8 years, depression developed in 131/825 (15.9%) participants. Improvements (1-standard deviation (SD)) increases in balance (adjusted relative risks, aRR:0.79, 95% confidence interval, CI:0.67-0.94), and one-SD increases in overall physical performance scores (0.80, 0.69-0.93) reduced risks for depression onset. Worsening menopausal symptom severity (1.91, 1.64-2.23) and pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms (1.53, 1.36-1.72) over 6.8 years increased depression risks, independent of age, ethnicity, education, marital status, hypertension, body mass index, baseline exposure and baseline CES-D levels. Worsening menopausal symptoms, pelvic floor dysfunction, and physical performance elevated depression risk, highlighting the need for early detection and intervention.
缺乏关于女性特定因素在中年女性抑郁症发展中作用的研究。从新加坡一家三级医院招募了健康女性(45 - 69岁)作为基线研究对象,并在6.8年后进行随访。使用经过验证的问卷确定风险因素,并客观测量身体机能。通过用随访值减去基线值来计算风险因素的变化。使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES - D)评分≥16和/或使用抗抑郁药物来定义抑郁症状。发病病例是随访期间出现的新病例。采用修正泊松回归分析来研究风险因素与结果之间的关联。6.8年后,131/825名(15.9%)参与者出现了抑郁症。平衡能力提高(1个标准差(SD))(调整后相对风险,aRR:0.79,95%置信区间,CI:0.67 - 0.94)以及总体身体机能评分提高1个标准差(0.80,0.69 - 0.93)可降低抑郁症发病风险。在6.8年期间,更年期症状严重程度恶化(1.91,1.64 - 2.23)和盆底功能障碍症状恶化(1.53,1.36 - 1.72)会增加抑郁症风险,且不受年龄、种族、教育程度、婚姻状况、高血压、体重指数、基线暴露情况和基线CES - D水平的影响。更年期症状、盆底功能障碍和身体机能恶化会增加抑郁症风险,这凸显了早期检测和干预的必要性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Maturitas. 2015-2
Physiother Theory Pract. 2018-6
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2025-2-27
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024-11
J Affect Disord. 2024-8-1
J Affect Disord. 2024-7-15
Lancet. 2024-3-9