Suppr超能文献

抗高血压药物类别与新发痴呆症风险:一项基于多国人群的队列研究。

Antihypertensive drug classes and risk of incident dementia: a multinational population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Cheung Edmund C L, Adesuyan Matthew, Szilcz Máté, Kalisch Ellett Lisa M, Shah Sonia, Jani Yogini H, Hägg Sara, Pratt Nicole, Lau Kui Kai, Luo Hao, Wan Eric Yuk Fai, Chan Esther Wai Yin, Wong Ian C K, Yuen Jacqueline K, Yiu Kai-Hang, Howard Robert, Brauer Ruth, Chui Celine S L

机构信息

Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Research Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2025 May 3;54(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf121.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) are first-line antihypertensive drugs for many patients, and influencing angiotensin systems may play a role in dementia risk. This study aimed to investigate whether exposure to different antihypertensive drug classes compared with ACEI affects the risk of dementia and pathological dementia subtypes in a large multinational database study.

METHODS

This was a multinational population-based cohort study using electronic health databases in Hong Kong, the UK, Sweden and Australia. A common protocol was used to harmonise the study design. An active comparator, a new user design, was applied to compare the risk of all-cause dementia between different antihypertensive drug classes, with secondary outcomes of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to generate results in each study site and were pooled in meta-analysis.

RESULTS

One million nine hundred twenty-five thousand, five hundred sixty-three individuals were included across the four databases with a median follow-up ranging from 5.6 to 8.4 years. Compared to ACEI, initiation with ARB was associated with a reduced risk of incident all-cause dementia [hazard ratio (HR): 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.94] and VaD (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96) but not AD.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest multinational cohort study conducted to date investigating different classes of antihypertensive drugs and the risk of incident dementia. When initiating antihypertensives, physicians and patients should consider the reduced risk of all-cause dementia and VaD with ARB compared with ACEI in their risk-benefit assessment.

摘要

背景

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)是许多患者的一线降压药物,影响血管紧张素系统可能在痴呆风险中起作用。本研究旨在通过一项大型跨国数据库研究,调查与 ACEI 相比,使用不同类别的降压药物是否会影响痴呆风险和病理性痴呆亚型。

方法

这是一项基于多国人群的队列研究,使用了香港、英国、瑞典和澳大利亚的电子健康数据库。采用通用方案来统一研究设计。应用主动对照、新使用者设计,比较不同类降压药物之间全因痴呆的风险,次要结局为阿尔茨海默病(AD)和血管性痴呆(VaD)。在每个研究地点使用带有治疗权重逆概率的调整后 Cox 比例风险模型生成结果,并在荟萃分析中进行汇总。

结果

四个数据库共纳入了 1925563 人,中位随访时间为 5.6 至 8.4 年。与 ACEI 相比,起始使用 ARB 与全因痴呆(风险比 [HR]:0.92,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.89 - 0.94)和 VaD(HR 0.87,95% CI 0.78 - 0.96)的发病风险降低相关,但与 AD 无关。

结论

这是迄今为止进行的最大规模的跨国队列研究,旨在调查不同类别的降压药物与痴呆发病风险。在开始使用降压药物时,医生和患者在进行风险效益评估时应考虑到与 ACEI 相比,ARB 可降低全因痴呆和 VaD 的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验