• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于跨理论模型的动机性访谈对2型糖尿病成年人血糖控制的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Effectiveness of Transtheoretical Model-Based Motivational Interviewing on Glycemic Control Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

作者信息

Wang Lizhen, Li Jing, Zhang Minghui, Chan Maggie Mee Kie, Ho Mu-Hsing

机构信息

School of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.

Department of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2025 Jun;22(3):e70041. doi: 10.1111/wvn.70041.

DOI:10.1111/wvn.70041
PMID:40415259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal glycemic control is known to be challenging for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to the maintenance of long-term self-management behavior. Incorporating the transtheoretical model (TTM) components into motivational interviewing (MI) has been applied to promote self-management behaviors such as physical activity in T2D patients. However, the effectiveness of the TTM-based MI intervention in improving glycemic control, self-management, and self-efficacy in adults with T2D remains unclear.

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aimed to estimate the effect of a TTM-based MI intervention on glycemic control, self-management, and self-efficacy in adults with T2D patients.

METHODS

We searched five electronic databases up to September 13, 2023. Two researchers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Pooled effects were estimated in standardized mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences (MDs) using fixed- and random-effects models. Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression explored the reasons for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty trials with 4214 participants were identified. The TTM-based MI intervention significantly reduced HbA1c (MD = -0.92, 95% CI [-1.08, -0.75], p < 0.001, I = 65%), FPG (SMD = -1.06, 95% CI [-1.38, -0.73], p < 0.001, I = 93%), and 2hPG (MD = -1.42 mmol/L, 95% CI [-1.83, -1.00], p < 0.001, I = 89%), with high, moderate, and low certainty of evidence, respectively. The intervention also improved self-management (SMD = 1.47, 95% CI [1.16, 1.78], p < 0.001, I = 80%) and self-efficacy (SMD = 1.53, 95% CI [1.04, 2.02], p < 0.001, I = 92%). Meta-analysis revealed that MI treatment dose and initial glycemic status contributed to the high heterogeneity.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

The TTM-based MI intervention can be a promising intervention for understanding patients' stage of change with tailored strategies and MI techniques to facilitate behavior change, resulting in improved glycemic control, self-management, and self-efficacy in T2D patients. Nevertheless, given the moderate to high risk of bias in the included studies, further rigorous randomized controlled trials should be conducted to examine the effectiveness of TTM-based MI interventions. Short and multiple sessions that comply with the fidelity of MI in the intervention plans are suggested in daily nursing routine for diabetes self-management education.

摘要

背景

由于需要长期保持自我管理行为,最佳血糖控制对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者而言具有挑战性。将跨理论模型(TTM)的组成部分纳入动机性访谈(MI)已被用于促进T2D患者的自我管理行为,如体育锻炼。然而,基于TTM的MI干预对改善成年T2D患者的血糖控制、自我管理和自我效能的有效性仍不明确。

目的

本项对随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估基于TTM的MI干预对成年T2D患者的血糖控制、自我管理和自我效能的影响。

方法

我们检索了截至2023年9月13日的五个电子数据库。两名研究人员独立筛选记录、提取数据,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2.0评估研究质量。使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型,以标准化均数差(SMD)或均数差(MD)估计合并效应。敏感性分析和Meta回归探讨了异质性的原因。

结果

共纳入30项试验,4214名参与者。基于TTM的MI干预显著降低了糖化血红蛋白(MD = -0.92,95%CI [-1.08,-0.75],p < 0.001,I² = 65%)、空腹血糖(SMD = -1.06,95%CI [-1.38,-0.73],p < 0.001,I² = 93%)和餐后2小时血糖(MD = -1.42 mmol/L,95%CI [-1.83,-1.00],p < 0.001,I² = 89%),证据确定性分别为高、中、低。该干预还改善了自我管理(SMD = 1.47,95%CI [1.16,1.78],p < 0.001,I² = 80%)和自我效能(SMD = 1.53,95%CI [1.04,2.02],p < 0.001,I² = 92%)。Meta分析显示,MI治疗剂量和初始血糖状态导致了高度异质性。

将证据转化为行动

基于TTM的MI干预可能是一种有前景的干预措施,可通过量身定制的策略和MI技术了解患者的行为改变阶段,以促进行为改变,从而改善T2D患者的血糖控制、自我管理和自我效能。然而,鉴于纳入研究存在中度至高度偏倚风险,应开展进一步严格的随机对照试验,以检验基于TTM的MI干预的有效性。建议在糖尿病自我管理教育的日常护理中,采用简短且多次的干预方案,并在干预计划中遵循MI的保真度。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Transtheoretical Model-Based Motivational Interviewing on Glycemic Control Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.基于跨理论模型的动机性访谈对2型糖尿病成年人血糖控制的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2025 Jun;22(3):e70041. doi: 10.1111/wvn.70041.
2
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.动机性访谈减少物质使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 12;12(12):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.
3
Psychological interventions for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.用于治疗炎症性肠病的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 17;4(4):CD006913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006913.pub3.
4
Telemedicine in Improving Glycemic Control Among Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.远程医疗在改善 1 型糖尿病患儿血糖控制中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 9;26:e51538. doi: 10.2196/51538.
5
Telerehabilitation for neck pain.颈部疼痛的远程康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 12;8(8):CD014428. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014428.pub2.
6
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
7
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.治疗师支持的针对成人焦虑症的互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 12;3(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.pub2.
8
Tobacco cessation interventions for young people.针对年轻人的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD003289. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003289.pub4.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Longitudinal Effect of an Integrated Nursing Intervention Based on the Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change (ITHBC) on Multidimensional Health Indicators in Older Radiotherapy Patients.基于健康行为改变整合理论(ITHBC)的综合护理干预对老年放疗患者多维健康指标纵向影响的验证
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Aug 22;20:1293-1304. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S532913. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Adapted motivational interviewing for brief healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment fidelity in real-world evaluations of behaviour change counselling.改编后的动机性访谈用于简短的医疗保健咨询:真实世界行为改变咨询评估中治疗一致性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Nov;28(4):972-999. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12664. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
2022 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.《2022年糖尿病自我管理教育与支持国家标准》
Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Spring;35(2):137-149. doi: 10.2337/ds22-ps02. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
3
The effect of motivational interviewing on metabolic control and psychosocial variables in individuals diagnosed with diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
动机性访谈对糖尿病患者代谢控制和心理社会变量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Sep;105(9):2806-2823. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
The Effect of Face-to-Face and Phone Call Motivational Interviewing on Cervical Cancer Screening.面对面和电话激励式访谈对宫颈癌筛查的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(6):E897-E902. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001089. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Telehealth delivery of motivational interviewing for diabetes management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.通过远程医疗提供动机性访谈以管理糖尿病:随机对照试验的系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):805-820. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.036. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
6
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.美国成年人糖尿病治疗和控制的趋势,1999-2018 年。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.
7
The impact of pharmacy care and motivational interviewing on improving medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.药学服务和动机访谈对改善心血管疾病患者药物依从性的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14457. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14457. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
8
Training diabetes healthcare practitioners in motivational interviewing: a systematic review.培训糖尿病医疗保健从业者进行动机访谈:系统评价。
Health Psychol Rev. 2022 Sep;16(3):430-449. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1926308. Epub 2021 May 24.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Glycemic control and associated factors among Iranian population with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.伊朗2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 Jul 8;19(2):933-940. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00583-4. eCollection 2020 Dec.