Antônio Portugal Santana Márcio, Gonçalves Chaves Daniel, Souza Renan Pedra, Jardim Leticia Lemos, Zuccherato Luciana Werneck, Santos Brendon Ayala Silva, Cerqueira Mônica Hermida, Lorenzato Claudia Santos, Franco Vivian Karla Brognoli, Rezende Suely Meireles
Fundação Hemominas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Haemophilia. 2025 Jul;31(4):668-678. doi: 10.1111/hae.70048. Epub 2025 May 25.
Haemophilia A (HA) is an inherited bleeding disorder due to Factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. Treatment with FVIII can activate immune mechanisms, which may lead to inhibitor development.
This study aimed to perform a longitudinal and exploratory analysis of immunological biomarkers during replacement with FVIII concentrate and after immune tolerance induction (ITI) in patients who developed a high-responding inhibitor.
Biological samples and clinical data from severe and moderately severe persons with HA (PwHA; FVIII < 0.02 IU/mL) were obtained before any or after minimal exposure (≤5 days) to FVIII (T0), at inhibitor development (INB+), at 75 exposure days (ED) without inhibitor (INB-) (T1) and at end of ITI (T2). Biomarkers were assessed at T0, T1 and T2.
One hundred patients were analysed, of whom 32 (86.5%) developed high-responding inhibitor and underwent ITI. We found no difference in the plasma concentration of the 15 immunological biomarkers at T0 or at T1 versus T2 in INB+ compared with INB-. However, at T1, PwHA INB+ who failed ITI had higher median concentration of interleukin (IL)-2 (3.50 vs. 0.85 pg/mL; q = 0.016), IL-10 (3.46 vs. 0.74 pg/mL; q = 0.035), tumour necrosis factor (TNF) (11.18 vs. 0.93 pg/mL; q = 0.016), interferon-gamma (INF-γ) (98.57 vs. 3.57 pg/mL; q = 0.035) and CCL5 (5245.11 vs. 3107.86 pg/mL; p = 0.037) compared with those who achieved complete response, respectively.
Patients who failed ITI had higher concentration of IL-2, IL-10, TNF, INF-γ and CCL5 in comparison with complete responders, suggesting that these biomarkers could be potential predictors of ITI outcome.
甲型血友病(HA)是一种由于凝血因子VIII(FVIII)缺乏引起的遗传性出血性疾病。使用FVIII进行治疗可激活免疫机制,这可能导致抑制剂的产生。
本研究旨在对产生高反应性抑制剂的患者在使用FVIII浓缩物替代治疗期间及免疫耐受诱导(ITI)后进行免疫生物标志物的纵向探索性分析。
收集重度和中度重度HA患者(FVIII < 0.02 IU/mL)在首次接触或极少接触(≤5天)FVIII之前(T0)、出现抑制剂时(INB+)、75个暴露日且无抑制剂时(INB-)(T1)以及ITI结束时(T2)的生物样本和临床数据。在T0、T1和T2评估生物标志物。
分析了100例患者,其中32例(86.5%)产生高反应性抑制剂并接受了ITI。我们发现,与INB-相比,INB+患者在T0或T1时15种免疫生物标志物的血浆浓度与T2时相比无差异。然而,在T1时,ITI失败的INB+患者白细胞介素(IL)-2(3.50对0.85 pg/mL;q = 0.016)、IL-10(3.46对0.74 pg/mL;q = 0.035)、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)(11.18对0.93 pg/mL;q = 0.016)、干扰素-γ(INF-γ)(98.57对3.57 pg/mL;q = 0.035)和CCL5(5245.11对3107.86 pg/mL;p = 0.037)的中位浓度分别高于获得完全缓解的患者。
与完全缓解者相比,ITI失败的患者IL-2、IL-10、TNF、INF-γ和CCL5浓度更高,表明这些生物标志物可能是ITI结果的潜在预测指标。