• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SOS反应与三羧酸循环富马酸酶的联合失活以及适应性反应增强了对抗生素的敏感性。

Combined inactivation of the SOS response with TCA fumarases and the adaptive response enhances antibiotic susceptibility against .

作者信息

Murillo-Torres Marina, Peñalver-Fernández Isabel María, Quero-Delgado Marta, Diaz-Diaz Sara, Romero-Muñoz María, Recacha Esther, Docobo-Pérez Fernando, Rodríguez-Martínez José Manuel

机构信息

Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena / CSIC / Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2025 May 9;16:1570764. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570764. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570764
PMID:40415939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12098349/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Targeting bacterial DNA damage responses such as the SOS response represents a promising strategy for enhancing the efficacy of existing antimicrobials. This study focuses on a recently discovered DNA damage response mechanism involving tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) fumarases and the adaptive response, crucial for survival in the presence of genotoxic methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). We investigated whether this pathway contributes to protection against antibiotics, either separately or in combination with the SOS response.

METHODS

An isogenic collection of BW25113 mutants was used, including strains deficient in fumarases (Δ, Δ, Δ) and the adaptive response (Δ, Δ Δ). Additional SOS response inactivation (Δ) was conducted by P1 phage transduction. All mutants were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, growth curve analysis, survival and evolution assays. To validate the relevance of these findings, experiments were also performed in a quinolone-resistant ST131 clinical isolate.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Overall, no significant differences or only moderate increases in susceptibility were observed in the single mutants, with Δ and Δ mutants showing the highest susceptibility. To enhance this effect, these genes were then inactivated in combination with the SOS response by constructing Δ/Δ and Δ/Δ mutants. These combinations exhibited significant differences in susceptibility to various antimicrobials, particularly cephalosporins and quinolones, and especially in the Δ/Δ strain. To further assess these results, we constructed an ST131 Δ/Δ mutant, in which a similar trend was observed. Together, these findings suggest that co-targeting the SOS response together with fumarases or the adaptive response could enhance the effectiveness of antibiotics against , potentially leading to new therapeutic strategies.

摘要

引言

针对细菌的DNA损伤反应,如SOS反应,是提高现有抗菌药物疗效的一种有前景的策略。本研究聚焦于一种最近发现的DNA损伤反应机制,该机制涉及三羧酸循环(TCA)延胡索酸酶和适应性反应,这对于在存在基因毒性甲基磺酸甲酯(MMS)的情况下生存至关重要。我们研究了该途径是否单独或与SOS反应联合有助于对抗生素的保护作用。

方法

使用BW25113突变体的同基因菌株库,包括延胡索酸酶缺陷菌株(Δ,Δ,Δ)和适应性反应缺陷菌株(Δ,Δ Δ)。通过P1噬菌体转导进行额外的SOS反应失活(Δ)。所有突变体均进行抗菌药敏试验、生长曲线分析、生存和进化测定。为了验证这些发现的相关性,还在耐喹诺酮的ST131临床分离株中进行了实验。

结果与讨论

总体而言,在单个突变体中未观察到显著差异或仅敏感性有适度增加,其中Δ和Δ突变体显示出最高的敏感性。为了增强这种效果,然后通过构建Δ/Δ和Δ/Δ突变体将这些基因与SOS反应联合失活。这些组合在对各种抗菌药物的敏感性方面表现出显著差异,特别是对头孢菌素和喹诺酮类药物,尤其是在Δ/Δ菌株中。为了进一步评估这些结果,我们构建了ST131 Δ/Δ突变体,在其中观察到了类似的趋势。总之,这些发现表明,共同靶向SOS反应以及延胡索酸酶或适应性反应可以增强抗生素对的有效性,可能会带来新的治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3367/12098349/f82f04fbf30b/fmicb-16-1570764-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3367/12098349/b0b3ec93eb37/fmicb-16-1570764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3367/12098349/7c9dc7cdd53c/fmicb-16-1570764-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3367/12098349/f82f04fbf30b/fmicb-16-1570764-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3367/12098349/b0b3ec93eb37/fmicb-16-1570764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3367/12098349/7c9dc7cdd53c/fmicb-16-1570764-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3367/12098349/f82f04fbf30b/fmicb-16-1570764-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Combined inactivation of the SOS response with TCA fumarases and the adaptive response enhances antibiotic susceptibility against .SOS反应与三羧酸循环富马酸酶的联合失活以及适应性反应增强了对抗生素的敏感性。
Front Microbiol. 2025 May 9;16:1570764. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570764. eCollection 2025.
2
Synergistic Effect of SOS Response and GATC Methylome Suppression on Antibiotic Stress Survival in Escherichia coli.SOS 反应和 GATC 甲基组抑制协同作用对大肠杆菌抗生素胁迫生存的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Mar 16;67(3):e0139222. doi: 10.1128/aac.01392-22. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
3
Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response.喹诺酮类耐药性的 SOS 反应靶向逆转。
mBio. 2017 Oct 10;8(5):e00971-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00971-17.
4
Synergistic Quinolone Sensitization by Targeting the SOS Response Gene and Oxidative Stress.靶向 SOS 反应基因和氧化应激协同增强喹诺酮敏感性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Mar 18;65(4). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02004-20.
5
Effect of RecA inactivation and detoxification systems on the evolution of ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli.RecA 失活和解毒系统对大肠杆菌中环丙沙星耐药性进化的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Feb 23;77(3):641-645. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab445.
6
Effect of RecA inactivation on quinolone susceptibility and the evolution of resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli.RecA 失活对喹诺酮类药物敏感性的影响及临床分离大肠埃希菌耐药性的演变。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jan 19;76(2):338-344. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa448.
7
Suppression of the SOS response modifies spatiotemporal evolution, post-antibiotic effect, bacterial fitness and biofilm formation in quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli.抑制 SOS 反应可改变喹诺酮类耐药大肠杆菌的时空演变、抗生素后效应、细菌适应性和生物膜形成。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):66-73. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky407.
8
High-throughput identification of the sensitivities of an Escherichia coli ΔrecA mutant strain to various chemical compounds.高通量鉴定大肠杆菌ΔrecA 突变菌株对各种化学化合物的敏感性。
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2019 Jul;72(7):566-573. doi: 10.1038/s41429-019-0160-5. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
9
Adaptation of Escherichia coli to ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin: Differential proteomics of the SOS response and RecA-independent mechanisms.大肠杆菌对环丙沙星和恩诺沙星的适应性:SOS 应答及 RecA 非依赖机制的差异蛋白质组学
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2025 Feb;65(2):107420. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107420. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
10
Oxygenated monoterpenes citral and carvacrol cause oxidative damage in Escherichia coli without the involvement of tricarboxylic acid cycle and Fenton reaction.氧化态单萜柠檬醛和香芹酚在不涉及三羧酸循环和芬顿反应的情况下对大肠杆菌造成氧化损伤。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Oct 17;189:126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic action and resistance: updated review of mechanisms, spread, influencing factors, and alternative approaches for combating resistance.抗生素作用与耐药性:机制、传播、影响因素及对抗耐药性替代方法的最新综述
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 12;14:1305294. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1305294. eCollection 2023.
2
SOS-independent bacterial DNA damage responses: diverse mechanisms, unifying function.不依赖 SOS 的细菌 DNA 损伤反应:多样的机制,统一的功能。
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2023 Jun;73:102323. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102323. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Synergistic Effect of SOS Response and GATC Methylome Suppression on Antibiotic Stress Survival in Escherichia coli.
SOS 反应和 GATC 甲基组抑制协同作用对大肠杆菌抗生素胁迫生存的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Mar 16;67(3):e0139222. doi: 10.1128/aac.01392-22. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
XerC Is Required for the Repair of Antibiotic- and Immune-Mediated DNA Damage in Staphylococcus aureus.XerC 对于金黄色葡萄球菌对抗生素和免疫介导的 DNA 损伤的修复是必需的。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Mar 16;67(3):e0120622. doi: 10.1128/aac.01206-22. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
The past, present, and future of antibiotics.抗生素的过去、现在和未来。
Sci Transl Med. 2022 Aug 10;14(657):eabo7793. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo7793.
6
Bacterial Stress Responses as Potential Targets in Overcoming Antibiotic Resistance.细菌应激反应作为克服抗生素耐药性的潜在靶点
Microorganisms. 2022 Jul 9;10(7):1385. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071385.
7
Effect of RecA inactivation and detoxification systems on the evolution of ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli.RecA 失活和解毒系统对大肠杆菌中环丙沙星耐药性进化的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Feb 23;77(3):641-645. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab445.
8
A combination of Class-I fumarases and metabolites (α-ketoglutarate and fumarate) signal the DNA damage response in .I 型富马酸酶与代谢物(α-酮戊二酸和富马酸)的组合在. 中发出 DNA 损伤反应信号。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 8;118(23). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026595118.
9
Role of the SOS Response in the Generation of Antibiotic Resistance .SOS 响应在抗生素耐药性产生中的作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Jun 17;65(7):e0001321. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00013-21.
10
Synergistic Quinolone Sensitization by Targeting the SOS Response Gene and Oxidative Stress.靶向 SOS 反应基因和氧化应激协同增强喹诺酮敏感性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Mar 18;65(4). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02004-20.