Cantrell Jennifer, Ichimiya Megumi, Mowery Paul, D'Esterre Alexander P, Bingenheimer Jeffrey, Tulsiani Shreya, Hair Elizabeth C, Kreslake Jennifer M, Martin Madeline, Gerard Raquel, Evans William Douglas
New York University School of Global Public Health, New York City, NY, USA.
Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Digit Health. 2025 May 21;11:20552076251336522. doi: 10.1177/20552076251336522. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Incentives can be effective in survey research but evidence is limited on how incentive type impacts survey retention in longitudinal social media-based surveys. This study examined how certain and uncertain incentives affect study retention among US young adults recruited online and whether incentive effects vary by sociodemographic factors.
Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to a three-arm parallel trial ( = 1615) with (1) a lottery for a $200 gift card (uncertain), (2) a cash equivalent (CE) of a $5 gift card per survey (certain); or (3) a combination of both options (combined), and were surveyed at baseline, 30 days, and 60 days. This study focused on survey retention at 30 days (among baseline completers, = 1491) and 60 days (among 30-day completers, = 1018). Participants were not blinded to their condition but were blinded to other conditions and researchers were blinded until data collection was complete. Logistic regressions examined survey retention as a function of incentive condition and sociodemographics, with additional analyses of interaction effects. We report average marginal effects (AMEs) with significance defined as < 0.05.
The certain CE was effective for survey retention versus the lottery at 30-day follow-up only (43.8% [lottery] vs. 77.7% [CE], AME: 0.346, < 0.000); there were no differences between CE versus lottery at 60-day follow-up (76.1% [lottery] and 81.3% [CE], AME: 0.054, = 0.192). The combined incentive demonstrated significantly higher retention at both follow-ups versus the lottery but no significant advantage over the CE. Incentive effectiveness showed minimal variation across sociodemographic factors.
This study is among the few to experimentally test incentives for retention in online social-media based research. A certain CE was most effective for short-term web survey retention among young adults compared with a lottery. Findings suggest that small guaranteed rewards may better motivate study retention than uncertain larger amounts.
激励措施在调查研究中可能有效,但关于激励类型如何影响基于社交媒体的纵向调查中的调查留存率的证据有限。本研究考察了确定和不确定的激励措施如何影响在线招募的美国年轻人的研究留存率,以及激励效果是否因社会人口统计学因素而异。
参与者按1:1:1的比例随机分配到一个三臂平行试验(n = 1615)中,试验包括:(1)抽奖获得200美元礼品卡(不确定);(2)每次调查获得相当于5美元礼品卡的现金等价物(确定);或(3)两种选择的组合(组合),并在基线、30天和60天进行调查。本研究重点关注30天(基线完成者中,n = 1491)和60天(30天完成者中,n = 1018)时的调查留存率。参与者知晓自己的分组情况,但对其他分组情况不知情,研究人员在数据收集完成前不知情。逻辑回归分析将调查留存率作为激励条件和社会人口统计学的函数进行考察,并对交互作用进行了额外分析。我们报告平均边际效应(AMEs),显著性定义为p < 0.05。
仅在30天随访时,确定的现金等价物在调查留存率方面比抽奖更有效(抽奖组为43.8%,现金等价物组为77.7%,AME:0.346,p < 0.000);在60天随访时,现金等价物组和抽奖组之间没有差异(抽奖组为76.1%,现金等价物组为81.3%,AME:0.054,p = 0.192)。组合激励在两次随访中均显示出比抽奖组显著更高的留存率,但相对于现金等价物组没有显著优势。激励效果在社会人口统计学因素上的差异最小。
本研究是少数通过实验测试基于在线社交媒体研究中留存激励措施的研究之一。与抽奖相比,确定的现金等价物对年轻人短期网络调查留存率最有效。研究结果表明,小额保证奖励可能比不确定的大额奖励更能激励研究留存。