• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻译失误:评估社区药房服务在线信息的可读性。

Lost in translation: Assessing the readability of online information on community pharmacy services.

作者信息

Morrison Bobbi, Boyle Todd A, Johnson Sammy

机构信息

Gerald Schwartz School of Business, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS.

出版信息

Can Pharm J (Ott). 2025 May 22:17151635251332612. doi: 10.1177/17151635251332612.

DOI:10.1177/17151635251332612
PMID:40416341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12098308/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization's right to health underscores the need for accessible, acceptable, and quality health services. Given that most Canadians use the Internet for health information, the readability of online pharmacy services information is crucial for accessibility.

METHODS

This study assessed the readability of online information about pharmacy services from Canadian provincial pharmacy regulatory authorities (PRAs) and community pharmacy banners. Public-facing website content was evaluated using various readability tests. Scores were compared to recommended reading grade levels by health organizations, and differences between PRA and community pharmacy banner websites were analyzed.

RESULTS

Website content from 9 PRAs and 10 community pharmacy banners was analyzed in June 2024. Average readability scores exceeded the recommended eighth-grade level, with summary scores ranging from 8.45 to 15.28. International English Language Testing System scores for all websites also surpassed reading benchmarks necessary for Canadian immigration. Mann-Whitney tests indicated statistically significant differences between PRA and community pharmacy banner websites, with the latter being more readable.

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that both PRAs and community pharmacy banners provide information at an advanced reading level, hindering accessibility. This aligns with other research indicating that online health information is often too complex for the general public. Improving readability, particularly for new Canadians, is essential for better accessibility.

CONCLUSION

Public health information on PRA and community pharmacy banner websites generally exceeds the recommended readability level, limiting accessibility. Implementing readability assessments and plain-language standards can enhance the accessibility and engagement of online health information.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织的健康权强调了获得可及、可接受和高质量医疗服务的必要性。鉴于大多数加拿大人通过互联网获取健康信息,在线药房服务信息的可读性对于信息可及性至关重要。

方法

本研究评估了加拿大省级药房监管机构(PRA)和社区药房横幅上有关药房服务的在线信息的可读性。使用各种可读性测试对面向公众的网站内容进行评估。将分数与卫生组织推荐的阅读年级水平进行比较,并分析PRA和社区药房横幅网站之间的差异。

结果

2024年6月分析了9个PRA和10个社区药房横幅的网站内容。平均可读性分数超过了推荐的八年级水平,汇总分数在8.45至15.28之间。所有网站的国际英语语言测试系统分数也超过了加拿大移民所需的阅读基准。曼-惠特尼检验表明PRA和社区药房横幅网站之间存在统计学上的显著差异,后者的可读性更强。

讨论

结果表明,PRA和社区药房横幅都以较高的阅读水平提供信息,这阻碍了信息可及性。这与其他研究一致,即在线健康信息对普通公众来说往往过于复杂。提高可读性,特别是对于新移民来说,对于更好地实现信息可及性至关重要。

结论

PRA和社区药房横幅网站上的公共卫生信息通常超过了推荐的可读性水平,限制了信息可及性。实施可读性评估和平易近人的语言标准可以提高在线健康信息的可及性和参与度。

相似文献

1
Lost in translation: Assessing the readability of online information on community pharmacy services.翻译失误:评估社区药房服务在线信息的可读性。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2025 May 22:17151635251332612. doi: 10.1177/17151635251332612.
2
Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Using Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.使用大语言模型提高在线患者教育材料的可读性:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 4;27:e69955. doi: 10.2196/69955.
3
Artificial Intelligence Shows Limited Success in Improving Readability Levels of Spanish-language Orthopaedic Patient Education Materials.人工智能在提高西班牙语骨科患者教育材料的可读性方面成效有限。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 11. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003413.
4
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Assessing the Readability, Credibility, and Accuracy of Online Vaccine Information for Pregnant and Lactating Individuals: A Cross-Platform Analysis.评估针对孕妇和哺乳期女性的在线疫苗信息的可读性、可信度和准确性:一项跨平台分析
Birth Defects Res. 2025 Jul;117(7):e2500. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2500.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
With great power comes great responsibility. . . . The role of pharmacists in ensuring health equity.能力越大,责任越大。……药剂师在确保健康公平方面的作用。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2025 Sep 7:17151635251362250. doi: 10.1177/17151635251362250.

本文引用的文献

1
Accessibility reality check.可及性现状核查。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2024 Jun 10;157(4):155-160. doi: 10.1177/17151635241256621. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
2
Search engine optimization and its association with readability and accessibility of diabetic retinopathy websites.搜索引擎优化及其与糖尿病视网膜病变网站可读性和可访问性的关联。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;262(9):3047-3052. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06472-3. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
3
Patient perspectives on the vital primary care role of community pharmacists in Nova Scotia, Canada: qualitative findings from the PUPPY Study.患者视角下加拿大新斯科舍省社区药剂师基本医疗关键作用:PUPPY 研究的定性发现。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2024 May 7;32(3):216-222. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riae008.
4
Implementing and monitoring the right to health in breast cancer: selection of indicators using a Delphi process.实施和监测乳腺癌患者的健康权:使用德尔菲法选择指标。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jul 29;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01964-w.
5
Community pharmacists' expanding roles in supporting patients before and during COVID-19: An exploratory qualitative study.社区药剂师在 COVID-19 前后支持患者方面不断扩大的角色:一项探索性定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Feb;45(1):64-78. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01430-7. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
6
Demonstrating institutional trustworthiness: A framework for pharmacy regulatory authorities.彰显制度公信力:药剂监管机构框架。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Oct;18(10):3792-3799. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 May 1.
7
Impact of COVID-19 on frontline pharmacists' roles and services in Canada: The INSPIRE Survey.2019冠状病毒病对加拿大一线药剂师角色及服务的影响:INSPIRE调查
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2021 Jul 9;154(6):368-373. doi: 10.1177/17151635211028253. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
8
Readability levels and thematic content analysis of online and printed lead poisoning informational materials.在线和印刷品中铅中毒信息材料的可读性水平和主题内容分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):1874. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11944-w.
9
Improving COVID-19 vaccine-related health literacy and vaccine uptake in patients: Comparison on the readability of patient information leaflets of approved COVID-19 vaccines.提高 COVID-19 疫苗相关健康素养和患者疫苗接种率:比较已批准 COVID-19 疫苗患者信息传单的可读性。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Dec;46(6):1498-1500. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13453. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.在线 COVID-19 健康信息的易读性:四个英语国家之间的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;20(1):1635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5.