• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"Getting people access to services is also getting them access to a phone": Clarifying digital divide dynamics and their consequences in Community Mental Health Care.“让人们获得服务也就是让他们获得一部电话”:阐明社区精神卫生保健中的数字鸿沟动态及其后果。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1245-1254. eCollection 2024.
2
Do We Still Have a Digital Divide in Mental Health? A Five-Year Survey Follow-up.我们在心理健康方面是否仍存在数字鸿沟?一项为期五年的调查随访。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 22;18(11):e309. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6511.
3
The Digital Divide and Health Disparities in China: Evidence From a National Survey and Policy Implications.中国的数字鸿沟与健康差距:来自全国性调查的证据及政策启示
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 11;19(9):e317. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7786.
4
Lack of ownership of mobile phones could hinder the rollout of mHealth interventions in Africa.缺乏移动电话可能会阻碍移动医疗干预措施在非洲的推广。
Elife. 2022 Oct 18;11:e79615. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79615.
5
Digital tools to support mental health: a survey study in psychosis.数字工具支持心理健康:精神病学中的一项调查研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05114-y.
6
Mobile Phone Access and Implications for Digital Health Interventions Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Zimbabwe: Cross-Sectional Survey.津巴布韦青少年和年轻成人的手机使用情况及其对数字健康干预的影响:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 13;9(1):e21244. doi: 10.2196/21244.
7
Digital Opportunities for Outcomes in Recovery Services (DOORS): A Pragmatic Hands-On Group Approach Toward Increasing Digital Health and Smartphone Competencies, Autonomy, Relatedness, and Alliance for Those With Serious Mental Illness.数字康复服务机会(DOORS):一种实用的小组方法,旨在提高严重精神疾病患者的数字健康和智能手机能力、自主性、关联性和联盟。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2020 Mar;26(2):80-88. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000450.
8
A qualitative study exploring the barriers and facilitators of implementing a cardiovascular disease risk reducing intervention for people with severe mental illness into primary care contexts across England: the 'PRIMROSE' trial.一项探索在英格兰的基层医疗环境中实施针对严重精神疾病患者的心血管疾病风险降低干预措施的障碍和促进因素的定性研究:“PRIMROSE”试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05643-2.
9
Use of information and communication technologies among individuals with and without serious mental illness.信息和通信技术在有严重精神疾病和无严重精神疾病个体中的使用情况。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Aug;266:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Impact of Digital Inclusion Initiative to Facilitate Access to Mental Health Services: Service User Interview Study.数字包容倡议对促进心理健康服务获取的影响:服务使用者访谈研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jul 26;11:e51315. doi: 10.2196/51315.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the digital divide among people with severe mental ill health using the essential digital skills framework.使用基本数字技能框架衡量严重精神健康问题人群之间的数字鸿沟。
Perspect Public Health. 2024 Jan;144(1):21-30. doi: 10.1177/17579139221106399. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
"Can I Not Be Suicidal on a Sunday?": Understanding Technology-Mediated Pathways to Mental Health Support.“我能不在周日有自杀倾向吗?”:理解通往心理健康支持的技术介导途径
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2021 May;2021. doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445410.
3
Mental Health Service Use, Suicide Behavior, and Emergency Department Visits Among Rural US Veterans Who Received Video-Enabled Tablets During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,美国农村退伍军人收到配备视频功能的平板电脑后,心理健康服务的使用、自杀行为和急诊就诊情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e226250. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6250.
4
Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health.数字包容作为健康的社会决定因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Mar 17;4(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8.
5
The Role of Digital Navigators in Promoting Clinical Care and Technology Integration into Practice.数字导航员在促进临床护理和技术融入实践中的作用。
Digit Biomark. 2020 Nov 26;4(Suppl 1):119-135. doi: 10.1159/000510144. eCollection 2020 Winter.
6
Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代数字鸿沟的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1147-1148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa078.
7
Back to the Future: Achieving Health Equity Through Health Informatics and Digital Health.回到未来:通过健康信息学和数字健康实现健康公平
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 14;8(1):e14512. doi: 10.2196/14512.
8
Financial hardship among individuals with serious mental illness.严重精神疾病患者的经济困难。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Dec;282:112632. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112632. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
9
Increasing Mental Health Care Access, Continuity, and Efficiency for Veterans Through Telehealth With Video Tablets.通过视频平板电脑远程医疗增加退伍军人的心理健康护理可及性、连续性和效率。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Nov 1;70(11):976-982. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900104. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Impact of socioeconomic position and distance on mental health care utilization: a nationwide Danish follow-up study.社会经济地位和距离对精神卫生保健利用的影响:丹麦全国性随访研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1405-1413. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1437-2. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

“让人们获得服务也就是让他们获得一部电话”:阐明社区精神卫生保健中的数字鸿沟动态及其后果。

"Getting people access to services is also getting them access to a phone": Clarifying digital divide dynamics and their consequences in Community Mental Health Care.

作者信息

Williamson Alicia K, Li Ella Jiaqi, Veinot Tiffany C

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1245-1254. eCollection 2024.

PMID:40417534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12099397/
Abstract

Access to mental healthcare is increasingly technologically-mediated. People with low socioeconomic status (SES) and serious mental illness (SMI) face lower rates of tech ownership and may lack technological skills, called "digital divides." Yet, little is known about how digital divides may impact mental healthcare access. Therefore, a qualitative study (ethnographic observations and interviews) was conducted with stakeholders working with low-SES SMI patients using community mental health care (CMH) (N=14). Findings showed that consumers struggled to maintain consistent internet-and thus mental healthcare-access despite owning smartphones. Consumers frequently faced care disruptions due to broken, lost, or uncharged phones. Staff and patients created effortful but ad-hoc workarounds to restore access during technological access disruptions. These solutions frequently occurred after healthcare appointments were missed. Digital divide concepts should accommodate the work necessary to maintain technology access even after ownership and its impact on care access-especially among low-SES SMI patients.

摘要

获得心理医疗保健越来越多地通过技术手段来实现。社会经济地位低下(SES)且患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人群拥有技术设备的比例较低,并且可能缺乏技术技能,这被称为“数字鸿沟”。然而,对于数字鸿沟如何影响心理医疗保健的可及性,人们知之甚少。因此,我们对14位与使用社区精神卫生保健(CMH)的低SES SMI患者打交道的利益相关者进行了一项定性研究(人种志观察和访谈)。研究结果表明,尽管拥有智能手机,但消费者仍难以保持稳定的网络连接,从而难以获得心理医疗保健服务。消费者经常因手机损坏、丢失或未充电而面临医疗保健中断的情况。在技术接入中断期间,工作人员和患者想出了费力但临时的解决办法来恢复接入。这些解决办法通常在错过医疗预约之后才出现。数字鸿沟的概念应考虑到即使在拥有技术设备之后,为维持技术接入所必需的工作及其对医疗保健可及性的影响,尤其是在低SES SMI患者中。