Mlambo Vongai, Wang Songnan, Musoni Maurice, Rando Hannah, Ingabire Lambert, Patton-Bolman Ceeya, Mukeshimana Gloria, Ntaganda Evariste, Bolman Ralph, Bendavid Eran, Lin Yihan
School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Faisal Hospital Kigali Rwanda.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e038365. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038365. Epub 2025 May 26.
One-third of the global rheumatic heart disease burden lies in sub-Saharan Africa, where 17% of patients with severe rheumatic heart disease die within 3 years without valve surgery. Surgery is often considered uneconomical, although this assumption is not grounded in cost-effectiveness analyses.
We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of mechanical valve replacement, bioprosthetic valve replacement, and valve repair compared with medical management for patients with severe rheumatic heart disease in Rwanda. Using a Markov model, we simulated disease progression, incorporating transition probabilities from a meta-analysis of regional observational studies. Costs were calculated using microcosting, and health effects were measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Cost-effectiveness was defined by a willingness-to-pay threshold of United States dollars (USD) $2307 per DALY, which is 3 times Rwanda's gross domestic product per capita. A 3% discount rate for costs and DALYs was applied.
Surgical strategies extended life expectancy from 7 to 11 to 13 years. Mechanical and bioprosthetic valve replacements were cost-effective compared with medical management. Mechanical valve replacement was most efficient, averting 5.64 discounted DALYs for a lifetime discounted cost of USD $10 539.34, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD $1704 per DALY. Bioprosthetic valve replacement averted 5.27 discounted DALYs but incurred higher costs (USD $10 873.06). Valve repair only averted 3.30 DALYs despite being least expensive (USD $8790.19). Repair became the most efficient surgical strategy if valve degeneration rates dropped <3.7% annually.
Mechanical valve replacement is the most efficient surgical strategy for severe rheumatic heart disease in sub-Saharan Africa, challenging assumptions that surgery is uneconomical. Reducing surgery costs and optimizing anticoagulation could further enhance cost-effectiveness.
全球三分之一的风湿性心脏病负担位于撒哈拉以南非洲地区,在该地区,17%的重症风湿性心脏病患者在未经瓣膜手术的情况下会在3年内死亡。手术通常被认为不经济,尽管这一假设并未基于成本效益分析。
我们评估了在卢旺达,对于重症风湿性心脏病患者,机械瓣膜置换、生物瓣膜置换和瓣膜修复与药物治疗相比的成本效益。使用马尔可夫模型,我们模拟了疾病进展情况,纳入了对区域观察性研究进行荟萃分析得出的转移概率。成本采用微观成本计算法得出,健康效果通过伤残调整生命年(DALYs)来衡量。成本效益的定义是每DALY支付意愿阈值为2307美元,这是卢旺达人均国内生产总值的3倍。成本和DALYs采用3%的贴现率。
手术策略将预期寿命从7年延长至11年至13年。与药物治疗相比,机械瓣膜置换和生物瓣膜置换具有成本效益。机械瓣膜置换最为高效,终身贴现成本为10539.34美元,可避免5.64个贴现DALYs,每DALY的增量成本效益比为1704美元。生物瓣膜置换可避免5.27个贴现DALYs,但成本更高(10873.06美元)。瓣膜修复尽管成本最低(8790.19美元),但仅避免了3.30个DALYs。如果瓣膜退变率每年下降<3.7%,修复将成为最有效的手术策略。
机械瓣膜置换是撒哈拉以南非洲地区重症风湿性心脏病最有效的手术策略,这对手术不经济的假设提出了挑战。降低手术成本和优化抗凝治疗可进一步提高成本效益。