文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

用于预防阿尔茨海默病的移动健康应用程序尚未解决的伦理问题。

Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.

作者信息

Korecky Karina, Schicktanz Silke

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Sep;28(3):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9. Epub 2025 May 26.


DOI:10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9
PMID:40418517
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12380646/
Abstract

In recent years, medical research has sparked hope that up to a third of dementia cases could be prevented. This optimism is driven by a shift in the understanding of dementia and, in particular, Alzheimer's Disease (AD)-from being a rapid-onset brain disease in later life to a condition strongly linked to lifestyle factors, progressing slowly and gradually through asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic, and symptomatic stages with varying degrees of severity. Accompanying this evolving perception, the use of mobile healthcare applications (mHealth apps) based on dementia prevention research has been on the rise. Health policymakers and companies increasingly advocate for these apps. However, concerns remain about the medical quality of such mHealth apps for dementia prevention. Bioethical research has highlighted significant challenges associated with their use. This paper critically examines dementia prevention strategies through the lenses of mHealth technologies. Exploring four mHealth apps for dementia prevention as case studies, we identify and analyze unsolved ethical issues related to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Hereby we offer a new perspective on familiar ethical dilemmas in dementia prevention, and emphasize the need to examine potentially intensified challenges in the context of digital health in the future in more depth.

摘要

近年来,医学研究燃起了希望,即高达三分之一的痴呆症病例有望得到预防。这种乐观情绪源于对痴呆症,尤其是阿尔茨海默病(AD)认识的转变——从一种在晚年迅速发病的脑部疾病,转变为一种与生活方式因素密切相关的疾病,它会在无症状、症状前和有症状阶段缓慢且逐渐地发展,且严重程度各不相同。随着这种认知的不断演变,基于痴呆症预防研究的移动医疗应用程序(mHealth应用程序)的使用一直在增加。卫生政策制定者和公司越来越多地倡导使用这些应用程序。然而,对于此类用于预防痴呆症的mHealth应用程序的医疗质量,人们仍存在担忧。生物伦理研究突出了与它们的使用相关的重大挑战。本文通过mHealth技术的视角批判性地审视痴呆症预防策略。通过将四款用于预防痴呆症的mHealth应用程序作为案例研究进行探索,我们识别并分析了与一级、二级和三级预防相关的未解决的伦理问题。借此,我们为痴呆症预防中常见的伦理困境提供了一个新视角,并强调未来有必要在数字健康背景下更深入地审视潜在加剧的挑战。

相似文献

[1]
Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.

Med Health Care Philos. 2025-9

[2]
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks

2025-1

[3]
mHealth Strategies Related to HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Knowledge and Access: Systematic Literature Review, Technology Prospecting of Patent Databases, and Systematic Search on App Stores.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-2-16

[4]
Does an App a Day Keep the Doctor Away? AI Symptom Checker Applications, Entrenched Bias, and Professional Responsibility.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-6-5

[5]
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-12-1

[6]
Categorizing Health Outcomes and Efficacy of mHealth Apps for Persons With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2017-8-30

[7]
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024-5-22

[8]
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-5-25

[9]
Fabricating mice and dementia: opening up relations in multi-species research

2025-2-25

[10]
Evaluating Effectiveness of mHealth Apps for Older Adults With Diabetes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-6-17

本文引用的文献

[1]
The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.

Med Health Care Philos. 2025-3

[2]
Moving Towards Ethical-Practical Recommendations for Alzheimer's Disease Prediction: Addressing Interindividual, Interprofessional, and Societal Aspects.

J Alzheimers Dis. 2024

[3]
Designing an mHealth application for informal carers concerning the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a need analysis survey.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-8-14

[4]
The iceberg of dementia risk: empirical and conceptual arguments in favor of structural interventions for brain health.

Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2023-12-16

[5]
Self-Testing for Dementia: A Phenomenological Analysis of Fear.

J Med Humanit. 2024-9

[6]
Mobile Health Apps, Family Caregivers, and Care Planning: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-5-23

[7]
The information, control, and value models of mobile health-driven empowerment.

Bioethics. 2025-6

[8]
Ethical issues when using digital biomarkers and artificial intelligence for the early detection of dementia.

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2023

[9]
Associations of socioeconomic status and healthy lifestyle with incident early-onset and late-onset dementia: a prospective cohort study.

Lancet Healthy Longev. 2023-12

[10]
Researched Apps Used in Dementia Care for People Living With Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Systematic Review on App Features, Security, and Usability.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-10-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索