• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.用于预防阿尔茨海默病的移动健康应用程序尚未解决的伦理问题。
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Sep;28(3):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
mHealth Strategies Related to HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Knowledge and Access: Systematic Literature Review, Technology Prospecting of Patent Databases, and Systematic Search on App Stores.移动医疗策略与 HIV 暴露后预防知识和获取相关:系统文献综述、专利数据库技术展望以及应用商店系统检索。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 16;9(2):e23912. doi: 10.2196/23912.
4
Does an App a Day Keep the Doctor Away? AI Symptom Checker Applications, Entrenched Bias, and Professional Responsibility.一天一个 App ,能否让医生远离我?人工智能症状检查应用程序、根深蒂固的偏见与专业责任。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 5;26:e50344. doi: 10.2196/50344.
5
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估移动健康应用程序的内容、疗效和可用性的工具:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433.
6
Categorizing Health Outcomes and Efficacy of mHealth Apps for Persons With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.认知障碍患者移动健康应用程序的健康结局分类及疗效:一项系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 30;19(8):e301. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7814.
7
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.患者和利益相关者对沙特阿拉伯通过移动健康应用程序收集的数据的隐私、安全和保密性的看法:一项混合方法研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 22;13:e54933. doi: 10.2196/54933.
8
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.影响移动医疗应用程序用于预防或管理非传染性疾病的依从性的因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371.
9
Fabricating mice and dementia: opening up relations in multi-species research制造小鼠与痴呆症:开启多物种研究中的关联
10
Evaluating Effectiveness of mHealth Apps for Older Adults With Diabetes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.评估移动健康应用程序对老年糖尿病患者的有效性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 17;27:e65855. doi: 10.2196/65855.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.数字健康技术对道德责任的影响:一项范围综述
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Mar;28(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10238-3. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
2
Moving Towards Ethical-Practical Recommendations for Alzheimer's Disease Prediction: Addressing Interindividual, Interprofessional, and Societal Aspects.迈向阿尔茨海默病预测的伦理-实践建议:解决个体间、专业间和社会层面的问题。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(4):1063-1081. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231137.
3
Designing an mHealth application for informal carers concerning the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a need analysis survey.设计一款针对非专业照护者的移动医疗应用程序,用于管理痴呆患者的行为和心理症状:需求分析调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):930. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11273-9.
4
The iceberg of dementia risk: empirical and conceptual arguments in favor of structural interventions for brain health.痴呆症风险的冰山:支持大脑健康结构性干预措施的实证和概念性论据。
Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2023 Dec 16;6:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100193. eCollection 2024.
5
Self-Testing for Dementia: A Phenomenological Analysis of Fear.自我痴呆症检测:恐惧的现象学分析。
J Med Humanit. 2024 Sep;45(3):267-281. doi: 10.1007/s10912-024-09849-x. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
6
Mobile Health Apps, Family Caregivers, and Care Planning: Scoping Review.移动医疗应用程序、家庭护理人员和护理计划:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 23;26:e46108. doi: 10.2196/46108.
7
The information, control, and value models of mobile health-driven empowerment.移动健康驱动的赋权的信息、控制和价值模型。
Bioethics. 2025 Jun;39(5):460-466. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13294. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
8
Ethical issues when using digital biomarkers and artificial intelligence for the early detection of dementia.使用数字生物标志物和人工智能进行痴呆症早期检测时的伦理问题。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2023 May-Jun;13(3):e1492. doi: 10.1002/widm.1492. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
9
Associations of socioeconomic status and healthy lifestyle with incident early-onset and late-onset dementia: a prospective cohort study.社会经济地位和健康生活方式与早发性和晚发性痴呆发病的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2023 Dec;4(12):e693-e702. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00211-8.
10
Researched Apps Used in Dementia Care for People Living With Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Systematic Review on App Features, Security, and Usability.用于痴呆症患者及其非专业照护者的痴呆症照护研究型应用程序:关于应用程序功能、安全性和可用性的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 12;25:e46188. doi: 10.2196/46188.

用于预防阿尔茨海默病的移动健康应用程序尚未解决的伦理问题。

Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.

作者信息

Korecky Karina, Schicktanz Silke

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Sep;28(3):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9. Epub 2025 May 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9
PMID:40418517
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12380646/
Abstract

In recent years, medical research has sparked hope that up to a third of dementia cases could be prevented. This optimism is driven by a shift in the understanding of dementia and, in particular, Alzheimer's Disease (AD)-from being a rapid-onset brain disease in later life to a condition strongly linked to lifestyle factors, progressing slowly and gradually through asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic, and symptomatic stages with varying degrees of severity. Accompanying this evolving perception, the use of mobile healthcare applications (mHealth apps) based on dementia prevention research has been on the rise. Health policymakers and companies increasingly advocate for these apps. However, concerns remain about the medical quality of such mHealth apps for dementia prevention. Bioethical research has highlighted significant challenges associated with their use. This paper critically examines dementia prevention strategies through the lenses of mHealth technologies. Exploring four mHealth apps for dementia prevention as case studies, we identify and analyze unsolved ethical issues related to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Hereby we offer a new perspective on familiar ethical dilemmas in dementia prevention, and emphasize the need to examine potentially intensified challenges in the context of digital health in the future in more depth.

摘要

近年来,医学研究燃起了希望,即高达三分之一的痴呆症病例有望得到预防。这种乐观情绪源于对痴呆症,尤其是阿尔茨海默病(AD)认识的转变——从一种在晚年迅速发病的脑部疾病,转变为一种与生活方式因素密切相关的疾病,它会在无症状、症状前和有症状阶段缓慢且逐渐地发展,且严重程度各不相同。随着这种认知的不断演变,基于痴呆症预防研究的移动医疗应用程序(mHealth应用程序)的使用一直在增加。卫生政策制定者和公司越来越多地倡导使用这些应用程序。然而,对于此类用于预防痴呆症的mHealth应用程序的医疗质量,人们仍存在担忧。生物伦理研究突出了与它们的使用相关的重大挑战。本文通过mHealth技术的视角批判性地审视痴呆症预防策略。通过将四款用于预防痴呆症的mHealth应用程序作为案例研究进行探索,我们识别并分析了与一级、二级和三级预防相关的未解决的伦理问题。借此,我们为痴呆症预防中常见的伦理困境提供了一个新视角,并强调未来有必要在数字健康背景下更深入地审视潜在加剧的挑战。