Zhao Shuguang, Wang Ting, Xiong Bingsen
Research Center of Journalism and Social Development, School of Journalism and Communication, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.
New Era International Communication Research Institute, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;15(1):18375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03723-z.
Conspiracy theories, despite their widespread societal impact, remain poorly understood at the neural level. While previous research has examined general belief processing, the neural mechanisms underlying how conspiracy beliefs influence information evaluation remain unclear. This study examined how individual differences in conspiracy belief modulate neural responses to conspiracy-related versus factual information using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thirty-one participants, pre-screened for high versus low conspiracy beliefs using validated scales, evaluated the veracity of matched conspiracy-related and factual statements during scanning. Behaviorally, high conspiracy believers were more likely to endorse conspiracy statements, whereas both groups evaluated factual information similarly. Neurally, a double dissociation emerged: high conspiracy believers exhibited increased activation in the ventromedial and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices-regions implicated in value-based decision-making and belief uncertainty-when evaluating conspiracy-related content. In contrast, low conspiracy believers showed greater activation in the hippocampus and precuneus, areas associated with episodic and semantic memory retrieval. These findings indicate that conspiracy beliefs engage distinct neurocognitive pathways in a content-specific manner. Rather than reflecting a generalized bias, belief-related neural differences selectively emerge during the processing of conspiratorial information. This study offers novel insight into the neural basis of belief persistence and may inform strategies for promoting critical reasoning in the face of misinformation.
尽管阴谋论具有广泛的社会影响,但在神经层面上人们对其仍知之甚少。虽然先前的研究考察了一般的信念处理过程,但阴谋论信念影响信息评估的潜在神经机制仍不清楚。本研究使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI),考察了阴谋论信念的个体差异如何调节对阴谋相关信息与事实性信息的神经反应。31名参与者通过经过验证的量表进行了高阴谋论信念与低阴谋论信念的预筛选,在扫描过程中评估了匹配的阴谋相关陈述和事实性陈述的真实性。在行为上,高阴谋论信念者更有可能认可阴谋论陈述,而两组对事实性信息的评估相似。在神经层面上,出现了一种双重分离:高阴谋论信念者在评估阴谋相关内容时,腹内侧和背内侧前额叶皮层(与基于价值的决策和信念不确定性有关的区域)的激活增加。相比之下,低阴谋论信念者在海马体和楔前叶(与情景记忆和语义记忆检索相关的区域)表现出更大的激活。这些发现表明,阴谋论信念以内容特定的方式参与不同的神经认知途径。信念相关的神经差异并非反映一种普遍的偏差,而是在阴谋论信息处理过程中选择性地出现。本研究为信念持续存在的神经基础提供了新的见解,并可能为面对错误信息时促进批判性推理的策略提供参考。