Artazcoz Lucía, Carrere Juli, Pérez Katherine, Sánchez-Ledesma Esther, Serral Gemma, López Maria José
Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Pl. Lesseps 1, Barcelona, 08023, Catalonia, Spain.
Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona, 08041, Catalonia, Spain.
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 26;25(1):1932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23080-w.
Research on the health and well-being of non-binary adolescents is limited, with most studies conducted in Anglo-Saxon and Northern European countries, often relying on non-representative samples. This study aimed to: (1) compare the socioeconomic characteristics of cisgender and nonbinary adolescents in secondary education; (2) examine differences in experiences of discrimination and problematic relationships with family and peers; (3) compare substance use between cisgender and nonbinary adolescents; and (4) analyze gender identity differences in health and wellbeing outcomes.
This cross-sectional study used data from the 2021 FRESC Health Survey on Adolescence in Barcelona. The survey is based on a representative sample of secondary education students aged 13-19. The final sample size consisted of 3,272 individuals (62 identified as nonbinary). Respondents answered questions covering experiences of discrimination, problematic relationships, substance use, and a wide range of health and well-being variables. Logistic regression models, adjusted for socioeconomic variables, were used to test the associations between gender identity and the various health-related variables.
In the sample, 1.9% identified as nonbinary (2.6% among those assigned female at birth and 1.2% among those assigned male at birth). Nonbinary individuals were younger, more likely to have a lower socioeconomic status, live in single-mother households, and have a mother born outside Catalonia. Overall, nearly all health-related outcomes, except for substance use, were worse for cisgender girls but, particularly, for nonbinary individuals, compared to cisgender boys.
Cisgender girls and, especially, nonbinary adolescents report lower well-being compared to cisgender boys across a range of well-being domains. These findings highlight the importance of expanding research on nonbinary adolescents and incorporating questions about gender identity in health surveys, while also distinguishing between cisgender boys and girls. Additionally, targeted interventions are essential to support young people in expressing and living authentically in alignment with their gender identity.
关于非二元青少年健康与幸福的研究有限,大多数研究在盎格鲁-撒克逊和北欧国家进行,且往往依赖非代表性样本。本研究旨在:(1)比较接受中等教育的顺性别和非二元青少年的社会经济特征;(2)研究歧视经历以及与家庭和同伴的问题关系方面的差异;(3)比较顺性别和非二元青少年之间的物质使用情况;(4)分析健康和幸福结果方面的性别认同差异。
这项横断面研究使用了2021年巴塞罗那青少年FRESC健康调查的数据。该调查基于13至19岁中等教育学生的代表性样本。最终样本量为3272人(其中62人被认定为非二元)。受访者回答了关于歧视经历、问题关系、物质使用以及一系列健康和幸福变量的问题。使用经社会经济变量调整的逻辑回归模型来检验性别认同与各种健康相关变量之间的关联。
在样本中,1.9%的人被认定为非二元(出生时被指定为女性的人群中这一比例为2.6%,出生时被指定为男性的人群中为1.2%)。非二元个体更年轻,社会经济地位较低的可能性更大,生活在单亲母亲家庭中,且母亲出生在加泰罗尼亚以外地区。总体而言,除物质使用外,几乎所有与健康相关的结果在顺性别女孩中更差,但尤其是与顺性别男孩相比,在非二元个体中更差。
与顺性别男孩相比,顺性别女孩尤其是非二元青少年在一系列幸福领域的幸福感较低。这些发现凸显了扩大对非二元青少年研究以及在健康调查中纳入关于性别认同问题的重要性,同时也要区分顺性别男孩和女孩。此外,有针对性的干预对于支持年轻人按照其性别认同真实地表达和生活至关重要。