Suppr超能文献

LGBT青年中AFAB占主导地位背后的社会因素:来自一项大型欧洲调查的证据。

Social factors behind the AFAB predominance in LGBT youths: evidence from a large European survey.

作者信息

Vandendriessche Claire, Cohen David

机构信息

Trajectoires Jeunes Trans, Acceptess-T, 88 rue Philippe de Girard, Paris, 75018, France.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, APHP. SU, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 bd de l'Hôpital, Paris, 75013, France.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 3. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02595-4.

Abstract

Trans youth reports reveal a predominance of assigned female at birth (AFAB) people (i.e. transmasculine people) over assigned male at birth (AMAB) people (i.e. transfeminine people). It has been suggested that "social contagion" through social media could be more frequent in AFAB people, causing a hypothesized "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" (ROGD) in adolescence, with detrimental correlates to health. We aim to test (1) whether the suggested effect of ROGD on an AFAB predominance in adolescence could have an alternative explanation such as the effect of national LGBT policies; (2) the suggested effects of ROGD by which transmasculine people who had a more rapid development of their trans identity in adolescence would use more often social media to connect to peers and would have a lower health status. Regarding our methods, we used the cross-sectional LGTI Survey II (2019) of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (137,553 LGBT people) and the ILGA-Europe's Rainbow Index (2019) of national LGBT policy scores. We calculated the chances to recognize and share an LGBT identity for AFAB/AMAB cis/trans people, expected sex ratios for cis/trans people at every age given equal total AFAB and AMAB populations, and national AFAB vs. AMAB differences in ages of LGBT identity-sharing adjusted by their ages of self-perception. We tested among adolescent respondents whether belonging to the hypothesized ROGD population was associated with social media use or poorer self-assessed health. As regards our findings, we predicted a predominance of AFAB trans adolescents as well as AFAB LGB cis adolescents in accordance with our observation that AMAB youth shared their identity later than AFAB youth in all 30 countries, their age of self-perception being held equal. We found that national differences in ages of identity-sharing significantly correlated with ILGA-Europe's Rainbow Index. We did not find that transmasculine people who had a rapid development of a trans identity in adolescence used more social media or had worse health. However, when we restricted the sample to those who were adolescents in the survey (N = 6209), we found that transmasculine youth who had a more rapid affirmation (< 1 year) used more frequently social media, though they did not have poorer health. To conclude, the AFAB predominance in adolescence may not be trans-specific. The effect of social influence on the emergence of LGBT identities in adolescence may exist at the micro level (social media use by transmasculine adolescents) but also at the macro level (state laws). These findings give support to some of the ROGD hypothesis features but contradict others, and plead for more research on how gender minority stress affects the likelihood of LGBT people to disclose their identity.

摘要

跨性别青少年报告显示,出生时被指定为女性(AFAB)的人(即跨性别男性)比出生时被指定为男性(AMAB)的人(即跨性别女性)占比更高。有人认为,通过社交媒体的“社会传染”在AFAB人群中可能更频繁,导致青少年出现一种假设的“快速 onset 性别焦虑症”(ROGD),并对健康产生有害影响。我们旨在测试:(1)ROGD对青少年中AFAB占主导地位的所谓影响是否可能有其他解释,比如国家LGBT政策的影响;(2)ROGD的所谓影响,即那些在青少年时期跨性别身份发展更快的跨性别男性会更频繁地使用社交媒体与同龄人建立联系,且健康状况会更差。关于我们的方法,我们使用了欧盟基本权利机构的横断面LGTI调查II(2019年)(137,553名LGBT人群)以及ILGA - 欧洲的国家LGBT政策得分彩虹指数(2019年)。我们计算了AFAB/AMAB顺性别/跨性别者识别和分享LGBT身份的几率、在AFAB和AMAB总人口相等的情况下每个年龄段顺性别/跨性别者的预期性别比,以及按自我认知年龄调整后的LGBT身份分享年龄方面的国家AFAB与AMAB差异。我们在青少年受访者中测试了属于假设的ROGD人群是否与社交媒体使用或自我评估的健康状况较差有关。关于我们的研究结果,根据我们的观察,在所有30个国家中,AMAB青年比AFAB青年更晚分享他们的身份,且自我认知年龄相同,我们预测AFAB跨性别青少年以及AFAB LGB顺性别青少年会占主导地位。我们发现身份分享年龄的国家差异与ILGA - 欧洲的彩虹指数显著相关。我们没有发现那些在青少年时期跨性别身份快速发展的跨性别男性使用更多社交媒体或健康状况更差。然而,当我们将样本限制为调查中的青少年(N = 6209)时,我们发现那些身份确认更快(<1年)的跨性别男性青年更频繁地使用社交媒体,尽管他们的健康状况并不差。总之,青少年中AFAB占主导地位可能并非跨性别特有的。社会影响对青少年LGBT身份出现的作用可能存在于微观层面(跨性别男性青少年使用社交媒体),也存在于宏观层面(国家法律)。这些发现支持了ROGD假设的一些特征,但与其他特征相矛盾,并呼吁更多研究关注性别少数群体压力如何影响LGBT人群披露其身份的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验