Yao Li-Qun, Wang Tao, Liu Xian-Liang, Tan Jing-Yu Benjamin
College of Nursing, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China.
Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane Centre, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 12;15(5):167. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050167.
To explore the feasibility and acceptability of using an evidence-based Tai Chi intervention to manage the fatigue-sleep disturbance-depression symptom cluster (FSDSC) in female breast cancer patients. This study reported the feasibility outcomes of a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), along with a nested qualitative process evaluation. Seventy-two female breast cancer patients experiencing the FSDSC were randomized into either a Tai Chi group or a control group. The Tai Chi group received an eight-week Tai Chi intervention consisting of two one-hour sessions per week, along with routine care, while the control group received routine care only. The feasibility and acceptability of the study procedure and Tai Chi intervention protocol were assessed by measuring recruitment, referral, retention and drop-out rates, questionnaire completion rates (including the Brief Fatigue Inventory [BFI], Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression [HADS-D], and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast [FACT-B]), intervention adherence, and safety outcomes. The nested qualitative process evaluation consisted of semi-structured interviews conducted among 22 participants to further explore their experiences of participating in this study and practicing Tai Chi. Descriptive data analysis was employed to present the feasibility and acceptability outcomes. Content analysis was employed to analyze the data from the qualitative process evaluation. A total of 72 breast cancer patients were successfully recruited over six months, with a recruitment rate of 79.1%, retention rate of 95.8%, and dropout rate of 4.2%. No missing data was found in the BFI, PSQI, or HADS-D. However, a notable number of missing values were found in the FACT-B, particularly for items related to sexual satisfaction. The Tai Chi intervention demonstrated a high level of feasibility, with an average adherence rate of 86.8%. Only eight participants reported minor discomforts, such as minor musculoskeletal discomfort and dizziness, but they were transient and manageable after stopping Tai Chi practice. Semi-structured interviews with 22 participants highlighted that Tai Chi was experienced to be generally convenient, energy-saving, and low intensity for FSDSC management. Participants also felt that the study questionnaires were comprehensible and straightforward. Many interviewees from the Tai Chi group reported perceiving favorable effects on FSDSC management, as well as overall functional health and well-being. The evidence-based Tai Chi intervention proved feasible, safe, and convenient as a non-pharmacological intervention for managing FSDSC in breast cancer patients. Future large-scale studies are needed to evaluate Tai Chi's definite effects on improving FSDSC among breast cancer patients.
探讨采用循证太极干预措施来管理女性乳腺癌患者疲劳 - 睡眠障碍 - 抑郁症状群(FSDSC)的可行性和可接受性。本研究报告了一项试点随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性结果,以及一项嵌套式定性过程评估。72名经历FSDSC的女性乳腺癌患者被随机分为太极组或对照组。太极组接受为期八周的太极干预,每周两次,每次一小时,并接受常规护理,而对照组仅接受常规护理。通过测量招募、转诊、留存和退出率、问卷完成率(包括简明疲劳量表[BFI]、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[PSQI]、医院焦虑抑郁量表 - 抑郁[HADS - D]和癌症治疗功能评估 - 乳腺癌[FACT - B])、干预依从性和安全结果,评估研究程序和太极干预方案的可行性和可接受性。嵌套式定性过程评估包括对22名参与者进行半结构化访谈,以进一步探索他们参与本研究和练习太极的经历。采用描述性数据分析来呈现可行性和可接受性结果。采用内容分析法对定性过程评估的数据进行分析。在六个月内共成功招募了72名乳腺癌患者,招募率为79.1%,留存率为95.8%,退出率为4.2%。在BFI、PSQI或HADS - D中未发现缺失数据。然而,在FACT - B中发现了大量缺失值,特别是与性满意度相关的项目。太极干预显示出高度的可行性,平均依从率为86.8%。只有8名参与者报告了轻微不适,如轻微的肌肉骨骼不适和头晕,但这些不适是短暂的,停止练习太极后可控制。对22名参与者的半结构化访谈强调,太极在管理FSDSC方面总体上被认为方便、节能且强度低。参与者还认为研究问卷易于理解且直接。太极组的许多受访者报告称,他们认为太极对FSDSC管理以及整体功能健康和幸福感有积极影响。循证太极干预作为一种管理乳腺癌患者FSDSC的非药物干预措施,被证明是可行、安全且方便的。未来需要进行大规模研究来评估太极对改善乳腺癌患者FSDSC的明确效果。